Literature DB >> 36274166

The use of 3D ceramic block graft compared with autogenous block graft for rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Carolina Mendonça de Almeida Malzoni1, Victor Gonçalves2, Juliana Possari2, Elcio Marcantonio Junior2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Dental implant placement may require a bone graft for vertical and horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation. Due to its osteoconduction, osteoinductive, and osteogenesis, autogenous bone graft characteristics are considered the standard gold treatment. However, autografts can promote postoperative morbidity and implicate difficulties concerning the graft adaptation to the recipient's bone since it can eventually avoid gaps. To overcome these issues, this trial will compare the performance of Plenum® Oss 3Dβ fit, an alloplastic graft, and a 3D-printed patient-specific graft based on β-tricalcium phosphate to the autograft procedure.
METHODS: This is a split-mouth randomized clinical study designed to evaluate the performance of personalized (patient-specific) bioceramic bone grafts (Plenum® Oss 3Dβ fit) for bone augmentation of the atrophic anterior maxilla in comparison to the autogenous bone graft. We hypothesize that the gain and maintenance of the grafted area volume and the quality of the newly formed bone tissue after eight months postoperative with the synthetic patient-specific graft will be superior to the autogenous bone graft. To assess the quantity and the quality of bone neoformation, volumetric and histological analyses will be performed. DISCUSSION: The fabrication of medical devices by additive manufacturing presents advantages over conventional manufacturing processes, mostly related to the precision of geometry and anatomy. Additionally, the osteoconductive proprieties of β-tricalcium phosphate enable this synthetic bone substitute as an alternative solution over autogenous graft for bone defect reconstruction. Thus, patient-specific bone grafts can potentially improve patient satisfaction, reducing the need for autogenous bone grafts, consequently avoiding implications related to this type of treatment, such as patient morbidity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered in REBEC (Registro Brasileiro de Ensaios Clínicos): RBR-76wmm3q; UTN: U1111-1272-7773. Registration date: 14 September 2021.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D-printed bone graft; Atrophic maxilla; Patient-specific bone graft; Synthetic bone substitute; β-tricalcium phosphate

Year:  2022        PMID: 36274166     DOI: 10.1186/s13063-022-06843-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trials        ISSN: 1745-6215            Impact factor:   2.728


  17 in total

Review 1.  Synthetic bone graft substitutes.

Authors:  W R Moore; S E Graves; G I Bain
Journal:  ANZ J Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.872

2.  Analysis of the risk of transmitting bovine spongiform encephalopathy through bone grafts derived from bovine bone.

Authors:  B Wenz; B Oesch; M Horst
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 3.  A review of bone substitutes.

Authors:  Solon T Kao; Daniel D Scott
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.802

4.  Vertical ridge augmentation of the atrophic posterior mandible with custom-made, computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing porous hydroxyapatite scaffolds.

Authors:  Michele Figliuzzi; Francesco Guido Mangano; Leonzio Fortunato; Rossella De Fazio; Aldo Macchi; Giovanna Iezzi; Adriano Piattelli; Carlo Mangano
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.046

5.  Maxillary ridge augmentation with custom-made CAD/CAM scaffolds. A 1-year prospective study on 10 patients.

Authors:  Francesco Mangano; Aldo Macchi; Jamil Awad Shibli; Giuseppe Luongo; Giovanna Iezzi; Adriano Piattelli; Alberto Caprioglio; Carlo Mangano
Journal:  J Oral Implantol       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Fabrication of individual scaffolds based on a patient-specific alveolar bone defect model.

Authors:  Jinghui Li; Lei Zhang; Shengyi Lv; Shengjie Li; Na Wang; Zhenting Zhang
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 7.  Biologic and clinical aspects of integration of different bone substitutes in oral surgery: a literature review.

Authors:  Vincenzo Luca Zizzari; Susi Zara; Giulia Tetè; Raffaele Vinci; Enrico Gherlone; Amelia Cataldi
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol       Date:  2016-05-12

Review 8.  Allogeneic bone onlay grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jonathan Waasdorp; Mark A Reynolds
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.804

9.  Posterior atrophic mandible rehabilitation with onlay allograft created with CAD-CAM procedure: a case report.

Authors:  Michele Jacotti; Carlo Barausse; Pietro Felice
Journal:  Implant Dent       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.454

10.  Efficacy of three-dimensionally printed polycaprolactone/beta tricalcium phosphate scaffold on mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Sanghoon Lee; Dami Choi; Jin-Hyung Shim; Woong Nam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.