Literature DB >> 20556251

Allogeneic bone onlay grafts for alveolar ridge augmentation: a systematic review.

Jonathan Waasdorp1, Mark A Reynolds.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This systematic review examines the published findings on the clinical effectiveness and predictability of allogeneic bone blocks for the correction of alveolar ridge deformities to support dental implant placement in humans.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A bibliographic search was conducted of the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for studies in which allogeneic block grafts were used for alveolar bone augmentation. The search was limited to human studies in English-language publications between 1950 and September 2008. Data extraction included the following outcomes: (1) vertical and/or horizontal bone gain/loss, (2) graft failure rate and complications, and (3) implant survival rate.
RESULTS: The initial search identified 35 papers from the electronic databases, with nine publications meeting inclusion criteria: two case reports, six case series, and one prospective, multicenter, consecutive case series. No randomized controlled clinical trials were identified in the search. Observational studies (110 total patients) generally reported high rates of clinical graft incorporation (90% or greater) and implant survival (99% to 100%); however, the majority of reports involved selected defects in anterior regions with short-term follow-up (less than 3 years).
CONCLUSION: Clinical evidence remains limited to case series and reports that differ with respect to alveolar ridge defect selection, treatment, and endpoints of therapy over short-term follow-up periods. Although case-based reports document the potential for allogeneic block grafts to support alveolar ridge augmentation and implant placement, insufficient evidence is available to establish treatment efficacy relative to graft incorporation, alveolar ridge augmentation, and long-term dental implant survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20556251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  19 in total

1.  Peri-implantitis. Part 2: Prevention and maintenance of peri-implant health.

Authors:  A Alani; K Bishop
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Allogeneic bone block for challenging augmentation-a clinical, histological, and histomorphometrical investigation of tissue reaction and new bone formation.

Authors:  Jonas Lorenz; Alica Kubesch; Sarah Al-Maawi; Frank Schwarz; Robert A Sader; Markus Schlee; Shahram Ghanaati
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Long-term implant success at the Academy for Oral Implantology: 8-year follow-up and risk factor analysis.

Authors:  Dieter Busenlechner; Rudolf Fürhauser; Robert Haas; Georg Watzek; Georg Mailath; Bernhard Pommer
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 2.614

4.  Vertical bone regeneration with deproteinised bovine bone mineral or biphasic calcium phosphate in the rabbit calvarium: effect of autologous platelet lysate.

Authors:  C Chakar; E Soffer; N Cohen; H Petite; N Naaman; F Anagnostou
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  The use of 3D ceramic block graft compared with autogenous block graft for rehabilitation of the atrophic maxilla: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Carolina Mendonça de Almeida Malzoni; Victor Gonçalves; Juliana Possari; Elcio Marcantonio Junior
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2022-10-23       Impact factor: 2.728

6.  Differences between buccal and lingual bone quality and quantity of peri-implant regions.

Authors:  Do-Gyoon Kim; Kathy L Elias; Yong-Hoon Jeong; Hyun-Jung Kwon; Matthew Clements; William A Brantley; Damian J Lee; Jung-Suk Han
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2016-01-02

7.  Single-tooth morse taper connection implant placed in grafted site of the anterior maxilla: clinical and radiographic evaluation.

Authors:  Francesco Guido Mangano; Piero Zecca; Fabrizia Luongo; Giovanna Iezzi; Carlo Mangano
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2014-11-05

8.  Esthetic outcome of implant-based reconstructions in augmented bone: comparison of autologous and allogeneic bone block grafting with the pink esthetic score (PES).

Authors:  Markus Schlee; Jan-Friedrich Dehner; Katja Baukloh; Arndt Happe; Oliver Seitz; Robert Sader
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 2.151

Review 9.  On the feasibility of utilizing allogeneic bone blocks for atrophic maxillary augmentation.

Authors:  Alberto Monje; Michael A Pikos; Hsun-Liang Chan; Fernando Suarez; Jordi Gargallo-Albiol; Federico Hernández-Alfaro; Pablo Galindo-Moreno; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Success rate of implants placed in autogenous bone blocks versus allogenic bone blocks: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Saeed Reza Motamedian; Moein Khojaste; Arash Khojasteh
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.