Literature DB >> 36273051

Association of Gas Diffusing Capacity of the Lung for Carbon Monoxide with Cardiovascular Morbidity and Survival in a Disadvantaged Clinical Population.

Andrew J Collaro1,2, Anne B Chang3,4,5,6, Julie M Marchant3,4, Mark D Chatfield5,7, Annette Dent6,8,9, Kwun M Fong6,8,9, Margaret S McElrea3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Low diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) and spirometry values are associated with increased mortality risk. However, associations between mortality risk and cardiovascular disease with the transfer coefficient of the lung for carbon monoxide (KCO) and alveolar volume (VA) are unknown. This cohort study: (i) evaluated whether DLCO, KCO, and VA abnormalities are independently associated with cardiovascular morbidity and/or elevated mortality risk and, (ii) compared these associations with those using spirometry values.
METHODS: Gas-diffusing capacity and spirometry data of 1165 adults seen at specialist respiratory outreach clinics over an 8-year period (241 with cardiovascular disease; 108 deceased) were analysed using multivariable Cox and logistic regression.
RESULTS: DLCO, KCO, and VA values below the lower limit of normal (< - 1.64 Z-scores) were associated with elevated cardiovascular disease prevalence [respective odds ratios of 1.83 (95% CI 1.31-2.55), 1.56 (95% CI 1.08-2.25), 2.20 (95% CI 1.60-3.01)] and increased all-cause mortality risk [respective hazard ratios of 2.99 (95% CI 1.83-4.90), 2.14 (95% CI 1.38-3.32), 2.75 (95% CI 1.18-2.58)], after adjustment for factors including age, personal smoking, and respiratory disease. Compared to similar levels of spirometry abnormality, DLCO, KCO, and VA were associated with similar or greater mortality risk, and similar cardiovascular disease prevalence. Analysis of only those patients with clinical normal spirometry values (n = 544) showed these associations persisted for DLCO.
CONCLUSION: Low DLCO, KCO, and VA measurements are associated with cardiovascular disease prevalence. As risk factors of all-cause mortality, they are more sensitive than spirometry even among patients with no diagnosed respiratory disease.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiovascular; D LCO; Gas diffusing capacity; K CO; Mortality; V A

Year:  2022        PMID: 36273051     DOI: 10.1007/s00408-022-00580-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lung        ISSN: 0341-2040            Impact factor:   3.777


  20 in total

Review 1.  Examination of the carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DL(CO)) in relation to its KCO and VA components.

Authors:  J Michael B Hughes; Neil B Pride
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Pulmonary function levels as predictors of mortality in a national sample of US adults.

Authors:  L M Neas; J Schwartz
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1998-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  FEV1 and FVC predict all-cause mortality independent of cardiac function - Results from the population-based Gutenberg Health Study.

Authors:  Christina Magnussen; Francisco M Ojeda; Nargiz Rzayeva; Tanja Zeller; Christoph R Sinning; Norbert Pfeiffer; Manfred Beutel; Maria Blettner; Karl J Lackner; Stefan Blankenberg; Thomas Münzel; Klaus F Rabe; Philipp S Wild; Renate B Schnabel
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  The usefulness of KCO is questionable.

Authors:  David J Cotton; Brian L Graham
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 21.405

5.  Official ERS technical standards: Global Lung Function Initiative reference values for the carbon monoxide transfer factor for Caucasians.

Authors:  Sanja Stanojevic; Brian L Graham; Brendan G Cooper; Bruce R Thompson; Kim W Carter; Richard W Francis; Graham L Hall
Journal:  Eur Respir J       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 16.671

6.  Forced vital capacity, airway obstruction and survival in a general population sample from the USA.

Authors:  P G J Burney; R Hooper
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 9.139

7.  Why does lung function predict mortality? Results from the Whitehall II Cohort Study.

Authors:  Séverine Sabia; Martin Shipley; Alexis Elbaz; Michael Marmot; Mika Kivimaki; Francine Kauffmann; Archana Singh-Manoux
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Pattern of diffusion disturbance related to clinical diagnosis: The K(CO) has no diagnostic value next to the DL(CO).

Authors:  I van der Lee; P Zanen; J M M van den Bosch; J-W J Lammers
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2005-06-06       Impact factor: 3.415

9.  Mortality and cardiovascular and respiratory morbidity in individuals with impaired FEV1 (PURE): an international, community-based cohort study.

Authors:  MyLinh Duong; Shofiqul Islam; Sumathy Rangarajan; Darryl Leong; Om Kurmi; Koon Teo; Kieran Killian; Gilles Dagenais; Scott Lear; Andreas Wielgosz; Sanjeev Nair; Viswanathan Mohan; Prem Mony; Rajeev Gupta; Rajesh Kumar; Omar Rahman; Khalid Yusoff; Johannes Lodewykus du Plessis; Ehimario U Igumbor; Jephat Chifamba; Wei Li; Yin Lu; Fumin Zhi; Ruohua Yan; Romaina Iqbal; Noorhassim Ismail; Katarzyna Zatonska; Kubilay Karsidag; Annika Rosengren; Ahmad Bahonar; Afazalhussein Yusufali; Pablo M Lamelas; Alvaro Avezum; Patricio Lopez-Jaramillo; Fernando Lanas; Paul M O'Byrne; Salim Yusuf
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 26.763

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.