Literature DB >> 3627184

Risk factors accounting for racial differences in the rate of premature birth.

E Lieberman, K J Ryan, R R Monson, S C Schoenbaum.   

Abstract

In a hospital-based cohort of 8903 black and white women, we investigated medical and socioeconomic risk factors that may explain the known increase in premature births among black women. Among the medical conditions examined, only the maternal hematocrit level (or some related factor) explained a substantial proportion (60 percent) of the increased rate of premature births to black women. Four economic, demographic, and behavioral predictors of prematurity were also examined: age less than 20 years, single marital status, receiving welfare support, and not having graduated from high school. The number of these socioeconomic risk factors occurring in a woman was strongly predictive of premature birth of her infant, regardless of the particular risk factors present. The presence of any one factor was associated with a moderate increase in the risk of prematurity (7.0 percent as compared with 4.6 percent with no risk factors present); the presence of two or more characteristics was associated with a much higher risk (11.2 percent). When the number of these four risk factors pertaining to an individual woman was taken into account, race was no longer a significant predictor of premature birth (odds ratio, 1.22; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.94 to 1.59). When both the maternal hematocrit level and the number of the four socioeconomic risk factors were taken into account, essentially all of the racial variation in prematurity was explained, with the odds ratio for prematurity among blacks being 1.03 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.79 to 1.35). We conclude that the racial difference in the rate of premature birth is attributable to specific medical and socioeconomic characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3627184     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198709173171206

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  40 in total

1.  Trajectories of fetal loss in the Czech Republic.

Authors:  E Carlson; J M Hoem; J Rychtarikova
Journal:  Demography       Date:  1999-08

2.  Maternal age and fetal loss. Missing abortion stratification adds to confusion.

Authors:  D C Reardon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-17

3.  Prenatal care use among selected Asian American groups.

Authors:  S M Yu; G R Alexander; R Schwalberg; M D Kogan
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Delayed birth equals more cancers and preterm births.

Authors:  B Rooney
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2001-06

5.  A meta-analysis of depression during pregnancy and the risk of preterm birth, low birth weight, and intrauterine growth restriction.

Authors:  Nancy K Grote; Jeffrey A Bridge; Amelia R Gavin; Jennifer L Melville; Satish Iyengar; Wayne J Katon
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10

Review 6.  The role of social determinants in explaining racial/ethnic disparities in perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Scott A Lorch; Elizabeth Enlow
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 3.756

7.  Long-term neurobiological consequences of early postnatal hCMV-infection in former preterms: a functional MRI study.

Authors:  Maik Dorn; Karen Lidzba; Andrea Bevot; Rangmar Goelz; Till-Karsten Hauser; Marko Wilke
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Methodological challenges in the study of fetal growth.

Authors:  T D Abell
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  1994-03

9.  Low birth weight in Spain associated with sociodemographic factors.

Authors:  C Rodríguez; E Regidor; J L Gutiérrez-Fisac
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 10.  Generations of loss: contemporary perspectives on black infant mortality.

Authors:  Adrienne J Headley
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.798

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.