Literature DB >> 36271075

Incorporating evolutionary and threat processes into crop wild relatives conservation.

Wolke Tobón-Niedfeldt1, Alicia Mastretta-Yanes2,3, Tania Urquiza-Haas1, Bárbara Goettsch4,5, Angela P Cuervo-Robayo1, Esmeralda Urquiza-Haas1, M Andrea Orjuela-R1, Francisca Acevedo Gasman1, Oswaldo Oliveros-Galindo1, Caroline Burgeff1, Diana M Rivera-Rodríguez6, José de Jesús Sánchez González7, Jesús Alarcón-Guerrero1, Araceli Aguilar-Meléndez8, Flavio Aragón Cuevas9, Valeria Alavez10,11, Gabriel Alejandre-Iturbide12, Carlos-H Avendaño-Arrazate13, César Azurdia Pérez14, Alfonso Delgado-Salinas15, Pablo Galán16, Manuel González-Ledesma17, Jesús Hernández-Ruíz18, Francisco G Lorea-Hernández19, Rafael Lira Saade20, Aarón Rodríguez7, Dagoberto Rodríguez Delcid16, José Ariel Ruiz-Corral7, Juan José Santos Pérez21, Ofelia Vargas-Ponce7, Melania Vega10,11, Ana Wegier10, Martín Quintana-Camargo22, José Sarukhán1,23, Patricia Koleff1.   

Abstract

Crop wild relatives (CWR) intra- and interspecific diversity is essential for crop breeding and food security. However, intraspecific genetic diversity, which is central given the idiosyncratic threats to species in landscapes, is usually not considered in planning frameworks. Here, we introduce an approach to develop proxies of genetic differentiation to identify conservation areas, applying systematic conservation planning tools that produce hierarchical prioritizations of the landscape. It accounts for: (i) evolutionary processes, including historical and environmental drivers of genetic diversity, and (ii) threat processes, considering taxa-specific tolerance to human-modified habitats, and their extinction risk status. Our analyses can be used as inputs for developing national action plans for the conservation and use of CWR. Our results also inform public policy to mitigate threat processes to CWR (like crops living modified organisms or agriculture subsidies), and could advise future research (e.g. for potential germplasm collecting). Although we focus on Mesoamerican CWR within Mexico, our methodology offers opportunities to effectively guide conservation and monitoring strategies to safeguard the evolutionary resilience of any taxa, including in regions of complex evolutionary histories and mosaic landscapes.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36271075     DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-33703-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   17.694


  32 in total

1.  Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it.

Authors:  Craig Moritz
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 15.683

Review 2.  Genetic consequences of climatic oscillations in the Quaternary.

Authors:  G M Hewitt
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2004-02-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Conservation planning in a changing world.

Authors:  Robert L Pressey; Mar Cabeza; Matthew E Watts; Richard M Cowling; Kerrie A Wilson
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2007-11-05       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  Stability predicts genetic diversity in the Brazilian Atlantic forest hotspot.

Authors:  Ana Carolina Carnaval; Michael J Hickerson; Célio F B Haddad; Miguel T Rodrigues; Craig Moritz
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The drivers of tropical speciation.

Authors:  Brian Tilston Smith; John E McCormack; Andrés M Cuervo; Michael J Hickerson; Alexandre Aleixo; Carlos Daniel Cadena; Jorge Pérez-Emán; Curtis W Burney; Xiaoou Xie; Michael G Harvey; Brant C Faircloth; Travis C Glenn; Elizabeth P Derryberry; Jesse Prejean; Samantha Fields; Robb T Brumfield
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-09-10       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies.

Authors:  Greger Larson; Dolores R Piperno; Robin G Allaby; Michael D Purugganan; Leif Andersson; Manuel Arroyo-Kalin; Loukas Barton; Cynthia Climer Vigueira; Tim Denham; Keith Dobney; Andrew N Doust; Paul Gepts; M Thomas P Gilbert; Kristen J Gremillion; Leilani Lucas; Lewis Lukens; Fiona B Marshall; Kenneth M Olsen; J Chris Pires; Peter J Richerson; Rafael Rubio de Casas; Oris I Sanjur; Mark G Thomas; Dorian Q Fuller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Building evolutionary resilience for conserving biodiversity under climate change.

Authors:  Carla M Sgrò; Andrew J Lowe; Ary A Hoffmann
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 5.183

Review 8.  Guidelines for planning genomic assessment and monitoring of locally adaptive variation to inform species conservation.

Authors:  Sarah P Flanagan; Brenna R Forester; Emily K Latch; Sally N Aitken; Sean Hoban
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2017-12-02       Impact factor: 5.183

9.  High extinction risk for wild coffee species and implications for coffee sector sustainability.

Authors:  Aaron P Davis; Helen Chadburn; Justin Moat; Robert O'Sullivan; Serene Hargreaves; Eimear Nic Lughadha
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2019-01-16       Impact factor: 14.136

10.  Genome-wide genotyping of a novel Mexican Chile Pepper collection illuminates the history of landrace differentiation after Capsicum annuum L. domestication.

Authors:  Nathan Taitano; Vivian Bernau; Lev Jardón-Barbolla; Brian Leckie; Michael Mazourek; Kristin Mercer; Leah McHale; Andrew Michel; David Baumler; Michael Kantar; Esther van der Knaap
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.