Literature DB >> 36269756

A Novel CNN pooling layer for breast cancer segmentation and classification from thermograms.

Esraa A Mohamed1, Tarek Gaber2,3, Omar Karam4, Essam A Rashed1,5.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the second most frequent cancer worldwide, following lung cancer and the fifth leading cause of cancer death and a major cause of cancer death among women. In recent years, convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have been successfully applied for the diagnosis of breast cancer using different imaging modalities. Pooling is a main data processing step in CNN that decreases the feature maps' dimensionality without losing major patterns. However, the effect of pooling layer was not studied efficiently in literature. In this paper, we propose a novel design for the pooling layer called vector pooling block (VPB) for the CCN algorithm. The proposed VPB consists of two data pathways, which focus on extracting features along horizontal and vertical orientations. The VPB makes the CNNs able to collect both global and local features by including long and narrow pooling kernels, which is different from the traditional pooling layer, that gathers features from a fixed square kernel. Based on the novel VPB, we proposed a new pooling module called AVG-MAX VPB. It can collect informative features by using two types of pooling techniques, maximum and average pooling. The VPB and the AVG-MAX VPB are plugged into the backbone CNNs networks, such as U-Net, AlexNet, ResNet18 and GoogleNet, to show the advantages in segmentation and classification tasks associated with breast cancer diagnosis from thermograms. The proposed pooling layer was evaluated using a benchmark thermogram database (DMR-IR) and its results compared with U-Net results which was used as base results. The U-Net results were as follows: global accuracy = 96.6%, mean accuracy = 96.5%, mean IoU = 92.07%, and mean BF score = 78.34%. The VBP-based results were as follows: global accuracy = 98.3%, mean accuracy = 97.9%, mean IoU = 95.87%, and mean BF score = 88.68% while the AVG-MAX VPB-based results were as follows: global accuracy = 99.2%, mean accuracy = 98.97%, mean IoU = 98.03%, and mean BF score = 94.29%. Other network architectures also demonstrate superior improvement considering the use of VPB and AVG-MAX VPB.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36269756      PMCID: PMC9586394          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276523

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


  21 in total

1.  Multi-input convolutional neural network for breast cancer detection using thermal images and clinical data.

Authors:  Raquel Sánchez-Cauce; Jorge Pérez-Martín; Manuel Luque
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 5.428

2.  Breast Cancer Detection and Classification using Traditional Computer Vision Techniques: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Saliha Zahoor; Ikram Ullah Lali; Muhammad Attique Khan; Kashif Javed; Waqar Mehmood
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging       Date:  2020

3.  CA-Net: Comprehensive Attention Convolutional Neural Networks for Explainable Medical Image Segmentation.

Authors:  Ran Gu; Guotai Wang; Tao Song; Rui Huang; Michael Aertsen; Jan Deprest; Sebastien Ourselin; Tom Vercauteren; Shaoting Zhang
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2021-02-02       Impact factor: 10.048

4.  Breast cancer diagnosis using thermography and convolutional neural networks.

Authors:  Sami Ekici; Hushang Jawzal
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 1.538

Review 5.  Early detection of breast cancer: overview of the evidence on computer-aided detection in mammography screening.

Authors:  N Houssami; R Given-Wilson; S Ciatto
Journal:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.735

6.  Automatic semantic segmentation of breast tumors in ultrasound images based on combining fuzzy logic and deep learning-A feasibility study.

Authors:  Samir M Badawy; Abd El-Naser A Mohamed; Alaa A Hefnawy; Hassan E Zidan; Mohammed T GadAllah; Ghada M El-Banby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Breast Cancer Classification from Ultrasound Images Using Probability-Based Optimal Deep Learning Feature Fusion.

Authors:  Kiran Jabeen; Muhammad Attique Khan; Majed Alhaisoni; Usman Tariq; Yu-Dong Zhang; Ameer Hamza; Artūras Mickus; Robertas Damaševičius
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.576

8.  Deep learning model for fully automated breast cancer detection system from thermograms.

Authors:  Esraa A Mohamed; Essam A Rashed; Tarek Gaber; Omar Karam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  BrainNet: Optimal Deep Learning Feature Fusion for Brain Tumor Classification.

Authors:  Usman Zahid; Imran Ashraf; Muhammad Attique Khan; Majed Alhaisoni; Khawaja M Yahya; Hany S Hussein; Hammam Alshazly
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-04

Review 10.  Breast Cancer Detection Using Infrared Thermal Imaging and a Deep Learning Model.

Authors:  Sebastien Jean Mambou; Petra Maresova; Ondrej Krejcar; Ali Selamat; Kamil Kuca
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.