Literature DB >> 36268371

Comparing corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure between healthy individuals and glaucoma subtypes: A cross-sectional study.

Reza Zarei1, Mohammad Hossein Zamani2, Yadollah Eslami1, GHasem Fakhraei1, Mehdi Tabatabaei1, Amir Reza Esfandiari2.   

Abstract

Background: The utilization of corneal biomechanical features in evaluating glaucoma and its progression has received particular attention. The severity of corneal biomechanical changes can play an essential role in response to medical or surgical treatment. The present study evaluated the biomechanical features of the cornea in glaucoma patients in different subtypes and compared them with the normal condition.
Methods: In this cross-sectional study, glaucoma patients and healthy individuals were referred to the tertiary hospital in 2021. Both eyes underwent a complete ophthalmologic examination, intraocular pressure measurement, and corneal biomechanical parameters using Corvis and ORA devices. Finally, data from both groups were compared.
Results: Based on the ORA evaluation, Lower CRF and CH were seen in glaucoma patients. In the Corvis evaluation, minor differences were observed in glaucoma as increased pachy, radius, and pachy slope, and decreased HC deformation amplitude, HC deflection amplitude, HC deflection area, deflection amplitude max, dArc length max, max inverse radius, and integrated radius. Lower ACD and higher CCT differentiated PACG from others. Lower CCT and higher C/D and WTW indicated NTG. Based on ORA, the highest CRF and CH were related to PACG and the lowest related to PEXG. In contrast, based on Corvis, higher pachy and radius and lower max inverse radius and integrated radius were specified for PACG. PEXG also had the highest values of the last two parameters.
Conclusion: Evaluation of corneal biomechanical parameters and other indicators can be beneficial in assessing the status and severity of glaucoma and distinguishing between disease subtypes.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corneal biomechanics; Corvis ST; Glaucoma; ORA

Year:  2022        PMID: 36268371      PMCID: PMC9577659          DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104677

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)        ISSN: 2049-0801


  11 in total

1.  Screening for Glaucoma in Adults: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  Roger Chou; Shelley Selph; Ian Blazina; Christina Bougatsos; Rebecca Jungbauer; Rongwei Fu; Sara Grusing; Daniel E Jonas; Shandiz Tehrani
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2022-05-24       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 2.  The surgical management of glaucoma: A review.

Authors:  Ridia Lim
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 4.207

3.  Corneal Biomechanics in Glaucoma.

Authors:  Karin R Pillunat; Robert Herber; Lutz E Pillunat
Journal:  Klin Monbl Augenheilkd       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 0.700

4.  STROCSS 2021: Strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional and case-control studies in surgery.

Authors:  Ginimol Mathew; Riaz Agha
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 6.071

5.  Corneal Biomechanics Assessment with Ultra High Speed Scheimpflug Camera in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Compared with Healthy Subjects: A meta-analysis of the Literature.

Authors:  Fiammetta Catania; Emanuela Morenghi; Pietro Rosetta; Vinciguerra Paolo; Riccardo Vinciguerra
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 2.424

6.  Comparison of corneal biomechanics among primary open-angle glaucoma with normal tension or hypertension and controls.

Authors:  Ya-Hui Wei; Yu Cai; Bonnie N K Choy; Bai-Bing Li; Ruo-Shi Li; Chen Xing; Xia Wang; Tian Tian; Yuan Fang; Mei Li; Ying-Zi Pan
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 2.628

Review 7.  Glaucoma and biomechanics.

Authors:  Babak N Safa; Cydney A Wong; Jungmin Ha; C Ross Ethier
Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.761

8.  Corneal biomechanics and biomechanically corrected intraocular pressure in primary open-angle glaucoma, ocular hypertension and controls.

Authors:  Riccardo Vinciguerra; Salwah Rehman; Neeru A Vallabh; Mark Batterbury; Gabriela Czanner; Anshoo Choudhary; Robert Cheeseman; Ahmed Elsheikh; Colin E Willoughby
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-03-28       Impact factor: 4.638

9.  Updates in Clinical and Translational Glaucoma Research.

Authors:  José Javier García-Medina; Maria Dolores Pinazo-Durán
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-31       Impact factor: 4.241

10.  Corneal Biomechanics for Ocular Hypertension, Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma, and Amyloidotic Glaucoma: A Comparative Study by Corvis ST.

Authors:  Nisa Silva; André Ferreira; Pedro Manuel Baptista; Ana Figueiredo; Rita Reis; Isabel Sampaio; João Beirão; Riccardo Vinciguerra; Pedro Menéres; Maria João Menéres
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-01-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.