Literature DB >> 36268138

Does participating in a long-term cohort study impact research subjects' longevity? Experimental evidence from the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study.

John Robert Warren1, Andrew Halpern-Manners2, Jonas Helgertz3.   

Abstract

There is considerable evidence that the act of participating in a survey can alter participants' attitudes, behaviors, and other outcomes in meaningful ways. Considering findings that this form of panel conditioning also impacts health behaviors and outcomes, we investigated the effect of participating in an intensive half-century-long cohort study on participants' longevity. To do so, we used data from a 1957 survey of more than 33,000 Wisconsin high school seniors linked to mortality records. One third of those people were selected at random to participate in the Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (WLS); the other two thirds were never again contacted. Our survival models show no evidence of panel conditioning effects on longevity: People selected at random to participate in the WLS had the same mortality outcomes as their peers who were not selected. This finding holds for the full sample, for women, for men, for population subgroups defined by family socioeconomic origins and educational experiences, and for treatment compliers.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cohort study; Mortality; Panel conditioning

Year:  2022        PMID: 36268138      PMCID: PMC9576583          DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  SSM Popul Health        ISSN: 2352-8273


  19 in total

Review 1.  Causal effects in clinical and epidemiological studies via potential outcomes: concepts and analytical approaches.

Authors:  R J Little; D B Rubin
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 21.981

2.  Statistical reporting of clinical trials with individual changes from allocated treatment.

Authors:  I R White; S J Pocock
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Big microdata for population research.

Authors:  Steven Ruggles
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2014-02

4.  Data Collection as Disruption: Insights from a Longitudinal Study of Young Adulthood.

Authors:  Jeong Hyun Oh; Sara Yeatman; Jenny Trinitapoli
Journal:  Am Sociol Rev       Date:  2019-07-09

5.  Panel conditioning in longitudinal studies: evidence from labor force items in the Current Population Survey.

Authors:  Andrew Halpern-Manners; John Robert Warren
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2012-11

6.  Cohort profile: Wisconsin longitudinal study (WLS).

Authors:  Pamela Herd; Deborah Carr; Carol Roan
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  Young women's dynamic family size preferences in the context of transitioning fertility.

Authors:  Sara Yeatman; Christie Sennott; Steven Culpepper
Journal:  Demography       Date:  2013-10

8.  Estimating effects from randomized trials with discontinuations: the need for intent-to-treat design and G-estimation.

Authors:  Sander Greenland; Stephan Lanes; Michele Jara
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.486

9.  Understanding differences in health behaviors by education.

Authors:  David M Cutler; Adriana Lleras-Muney
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2009-10-31       Impact factor: 3.804

10.  A randomised control trial assessing the impact of an investment based intervention on weight-loss, beliefs and behaviour after bariatric surgery: study protocol.

Authors:  Amelia Hollywood; Jane Ogden; Majid Hashemi
Journal:  BMC Obes       Date:  2015-03-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.