Literature DB >> 36268096

Anatomic pathology quality assurance: Developing an LIS based tracking and documentation module for intradepartmental consultations.

Bilge Dundar1, Stephanie J Chen1, John L Blau1, K D Anand Rajan1, Megan I Samuelson1, Michelle L Greek-Lippe2, Kim S Lake2, Robert A Robinson1.   

Abstract

Background: An electronic intradepartmental consultation system for anatomic pathology (AP) was conceived and developed in the laboratory information system (LIS) in 2019. Previously, all surgical pathology intradepartmental consultative activities were initiated and documented with paper forms which circulated with the pertinent microscopic slides and were eventually filed. In this study, we discuss the implementation and utilization of an electronic intradepartmental AP consultation system.
Methods: Workflows and procedures were developed to organize intradepartmental surgical pathology consultations from the beginning to the end point of the consultative activities entirely using a paperless system that resided in the LIS.
Results: The electronic consult system allowed electronic documentation of all steps of intradepartmental consultative activities. The system provided tracking ability for consulted cases and improved access to consult discussion for all departmental personnel, staff, and trainees. Consultation work queue was created for each pathologist and a summary of individual consultative workload was possible. Documentation of anatomic pathology quality assurance for intradepartmental consultative activity was easily assessed. Conclusions: The electronic intradepartmental consult system has allowed our department to electronically track intradepartmental consult cases, store the consultative opinion text with the case, record the pathologists involved, and document the consultation for internal quality assurance review as well as for accrediting organizations. Summarization of pathologist workload related to consultative activity was quantifiable and optimization of the consultative process was maximized for education in an academic setting.
© 2022 The Authors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomic pathology; Electronic intradepartmental consultation; Laboratory information system; Surgical pathology

Year:  2022        PMID: 36268096      PMCID: PMC9577041          DOI: 10.1016/j.jpi.2022.100109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pathol Inform


  10 in total

1.  Quantifying the value of in-house consultation in surgical pathology.

Authors:  Andrew A Renshaw; Nat E Pinnar; Michael R Jiroutek; Mary L Young
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.493

2.  Second opinion pathologic review in the management of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bofeng Chen; Ruchika Talwar; Lauren E Schwartz; Ryan P Terlecki; Thomas J Guzzo; Robert C Kovell
Journal:  Can J Urol       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 1.344

3.  Intradepartmental consultations in surgical pathology: Review of a standardized process and factors influencing consultation rates and practices in an academic and community hospital setting.

Authors:  Emily A Goebel; Helen Ettler; Joanna C Walsh
Journal:  Pathol Res Pract       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.250

4.  Association of eConsult Implementation With Access to Specialist Care in a Large Urban Safety-Net System.

Authors:  Marema Gaye; Ateev Mehrotra; Hannah Byrnes-Enoch; Dave Chokshi; Andrew Wallach; Laura Rodriguez; Michael L Barnett
Journal:  JAMA Health Forum       Date:  2021-05-21

5.  Second Opinion Expert Pathology Review in Bladder Cancer: Implications for Patient Care.

Authors:  Jennifer Gordetsky; Robin Collingwood; Win Shun Lai; Maria Del Carmen Rodriquez Pena; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  Int J Surg Pathol       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 1.271

6.  Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: clinical consequences of major disagreements.

Authors:  Elizabeth Manion; Michael B Cohen; Jamie Weydert
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 6.394

7.  Improved quality of patient care through routine second review of histopathology specimens prior to multidisciplinary meetings.

Authors:  Chantal C H J Kuijpers; Gerard Burger; Shaimaa Al-Janabi; Stefan M Willems; Paul J van Diest; Mehdi Jiwa
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2016-03-30       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Mandatory second opinion in cytopathology.

Authors:  Nathan Lueck; Chris Jensen; Michael B Cohen; Jamie A Weydert
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-04-25       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 9.  Electronic consultations (e-consults) to improve access to specialty care: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Varsha G Vimalananda; Gouri Gupte; Siamak M Seraj; Jay Orlander; Dan Berlowitz; Benjamin G Fincke; Steven R Simon
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 6.184

10.  A cohort study of a general surgery electronic consultation system: safety implications and impact on surgical yield.

Authors:  Jesus G Ulloa; Marika D Russell; Alice Hm Chen; Delphine S Tuot
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.