Varsha G Vimalananda1, Gouri Gupte2, Siamak M Seraj2, Jay Orlander3, Dan Berlowitz4, Benjamin G Fincke5, Steven R Simon6. 1. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), US Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, Massachusetts, USA Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Nutrition, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA varsha.vimalananda@va.gov. 2. Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 3. VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Section of General Internal Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 4. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), US Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, Massachusetts, USA Department of Health Policy and Management, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), US Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, Massachusetts, USA. 6. Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research (CHOIR), US Department of Veterans Affairs, Bedford, Massachusetts, USA VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Division of General Internal Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston Massachusetts, USA Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We define electronic consultations ("e-consults") as asynchronous, consultative, provider-to-provider communications within a shared electronic health record (EHR) or web-based platform. E-consults are intended to improve access to specialty expertise for patients and providers without the need for a face-to-face visit. Our goal was to systematically review and summarize the literature describing the use and effects of e-consults. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL for studies related to e-consults published between 1990 through December 2014. Three reviewers identified empirical studies and system descriptions, including articles on systems that used a shared EHR or web-based platform, connected providers in the same health system, were used for two-way provider communication, and were text-based. RESULTS: Our final review included 27 articles. Twenty-two were research studies and five were system descriptions. Eighteen originated from one of three sites with well-developed e-consult programs. Most studies reported on workflow impact, timeliness of specialty input, and/or provider perceptions of e-consults. E-consultations are used in a variety of ways within and across medical centers. They provide timely access to specialty care and are well-received by primary care providers. DISCUSSION: E-consults are feasible in a variety of settings, flexible in their application, and facilitate timely specialty advice. More extensive and rigorous studies are needed to inform the e-consult process and describe its effect on access to specialty visits, cost and clinical outcomes.
BACKGROUND: We define electronic consultations ("e-consults") as asynchronous, consultative, provider-to-provider communications within a shared electronic health record (EHR) or web-based platform. E-consults are intended to improve access to specialty expertise for patients and providers without the need for a face-to-face visit. Our goal was to systematically review and summarize the literature describing the use and effects of e-consults. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL for studies related to e-consults published between 1990 through December 2014. Three reviewers identified empirical studies and system descriptions, including articles on systems that used a shared EHR or web-based platform, connected providers in the same health system, were used for two-way provider communication, and were text-based. RESULTS: Our final review included 27 articles. Twenty-two were research studies and five were system descriptions. Eighteen originated from one of three sites with well-developed e-consult programs. Most studies reported on workflow impact, timeliness of specialty input, and/or provider perceptions of e-consults. E-consultations are used in a variety of ways within and across medical centers. They provide timely access to specialty care and are well-received by primary care providers. DISCUSSION: E-consults are feasible in a variety of settings, flexible in their application, and facilitate timely specialty advice. More extensive and rigorous studies are needed to inform the e-consult process and describe its effect on access to specialty visits, cost and clinical outcomes.
Authors: Kurt B Angstman; Steven C Adamson; Joseph W Furst; Margaret S Houston; James E Rohrer Journal: Health Care Manag (Frederick) Date: 2009 Jan-Mar
Authors: Jonathan Bergman; Katherine Neuhausen; Karim Chamie; Charles D Scales; Stacey Carter; Lorna Kwan; Steven E Lerman; William Aronson; Mark S Litwin Journal: Urology Date: 2013-10-05 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Judy E Kim-Hwang; Alice Hm Chen; Douglas S Bell; David Guzman; Hal F Yee; Margot B Kushel Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-05-29 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Jason H Wasfy; Sandhya K Rao; Utibe R Essien; Calvin A Richardson; Tamika Jeune; Susan A Goldstein; Elizabeth Laikhter; Melissa D Chittle; Michelle Weil; Marc Wein; Timothy G Ferris Journal: Endocrine Date: 2016-08-09 Impact factor: 3.633