| Literature DB >> 36267382 |
Oscar Mamani-Benito1, Renzo Felipe Carranza Esteban2, Ronald Castillo-Blanco3, Tomás Caycho-Rodriguez4, Madona Tito-Betancur5, Rosa Farfán-Solís6.
Abstract
Due to the emotional impact of COVID-19 on university students, the goal was to explore the relationship between anxiety, depression, psychological well-being, and life satisfaction among pre-professional interns. The research was carried out using an explanatory cross-sectional design, with the participation of 1011 pre-professional interns of 13 health networks from the department of Puno (Peru). Data were collected using the Satisfaction with Life Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-2, Patient Health Questionnaire 2, and the Psychological Wellbeing Scale. The main data analysis was carried out using the R statistical software, and implementing the confirmatory factor analysis technique, which evidenced that the explanatory model provides an acceptable value. Based on the above, a negative relationship between depression and life satisfaction, (β = -.60, p < .001) and a positive relationship between anxiety and life satisfaction (β = .28, p < .001) was shown, in addition to a mediating effect of the psychological wellbeing related to depression and life satisfaction (p < .001). In conclusion, life satisfaction is explained concerning the degree of depression and anxiety, as well as the moderating effect of psychological well-being. Despite that, there is an urgent need to take preventive actions to strengthen the mental health of the pre-professional health interns, who have also been providing support during the COVID-19 pandemic.Entities:
Keywords: Anxiety; Depression; Life satisfaction; Pre-professional practitioners; Psychological well-being; University students
Year: 2022 PMID: 36267382 PMCID: PMC9557111 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1The theoretical model and research hypothesis of the model studied.
Descriptive statistics, internal consistencies, and correlations for the study variables.
| Variables | Α | 1 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Psychological well-being | 9.2 | 8.2 | .87 | − | |||
| 2. Life satisfaction | 9.2 | 8.2 | .74 | .31 | − | ||
| 3. Anxiety | 10.0 | 6.8 | .86 | −.26 | −.23 | − | |
| 4. Depression | 20.0 | 9.5 | .83 | −.35 | −.32 | .78 | − |
All correlations are statistically significant (p < .001).
Figure 2Results of the explanatory structural model of life satisfaction. Standardized parameter estimates are shown. The names of variables de01, de02, an01 y an02 refer to depression and anxiety indicators, respectively.
Research hypotheses on spillover effects and their estimates.
| 95% CI | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypothesis | The route in the model | β | LL | UL | |
| Hypothesis 3 | Depression → psychological well-being→ life satisfaction | −.16 | .012 | −0.23 | −0.03 |
| Hypothesis 4 | Anxiety → psychological well-being→ life satisfaction | .09 | .055 | 0.00 | 0.13 |