Literature DB >> 36267250

Impact of Updated Clinical Practice Guidelines on Outpatient Treatment for Clostridioides difficile Infection and Associated Clinical Outcomes.

Erik R Dubberke1, Justin T Puckett2, Engels N Obi3, Sachin Kamal-Bahl2, Kaushal Desai3, Bruce Stuart4, Jalpa A Doshi5,6.   

Abstract

Background: The 2017 Infectious Diseases Society of America/Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (IDSA/SHEA) Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile infection (CDI) guideline update recommended treatment with fidaxomicin or vancomycin for CDI. We aimed to examine outpatient CDI treatment utilization before and after the guideline update and compare clinical outcomes associated with fidaxomicin versus vancomycin use.
Methods: A pre-post study design was employed using Medicare data. CDI treatment utilization and clinical outcomes (4- and 8-week sustained response, CDI recurrence) were compared between patients indexed from April-September 2017 (preguideline period) and those indexed from April-September 2018 (postguideline period). Clinical outcomes associated with fidaxomicin versus vancomycin were compared using propensity score-matched analyses.
Results: From the pre- to postguideline period, metronidazole use decreased (initial CDI: 81.2% to 53.5%; recurrent CDI: 49.7% to 27.6%) while vancomycin (initial CDI: 17.9% to 44.9%; recurrent CDI: 48.1% to 66.4%) and fidaxomicin (initial CDI: 0.87% to 1.63%; recurrent CDI: 2.2% to 6.0%) use increased significantly (P < .001 for all). However, clinical outcomes did not improve. In propensity score-matched analyses, fidaxomicin versus vancomycin users had 4-week sustained response rates that were higher by 13.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0%-22.9%; P = .0058) and 30.0% (95% CI, 16.8%-44.3%; P = .0002) in initial and recurrent CDI cohorts, respectively. Recurrence rates were numerically lower for fidaxomicin in both cohorts. Conclusions: Vancomycin use increased and metronidazole use decreased after the 2017 guideline update. Fidaxomicin use increased but remained low. Improved outcomes associated with fidaxomicin relative to vancomycin suggest benefits from its greater use in Medicare patients.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clostridioides difficile infection; Medicare; fidaxomicin; metronidazole; vancomycin

Year:  2022        PMID: 36267250      PMCID: PMC9578155          DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac435

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis        ISSN: 2328-8957            Impact factor:   4.423


  22 in total

1.  Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Thomas J Louie; Mark A Miller; Kathleen M Mullane; Karl Weiss; Arnold Lentnek; Yoav Golan; Sherwood Gorbach; Pamela Sears; Youe-Kong Shue
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Fidaxomicin versus metronidazole, vancomycin and their combination for initial episode, first recurrence and severe Clostridioides difficile infection - An observational cohort study.

Authors:  Sylvia Polivkova; Marcela Krutova; Vaclav Capek; Blanka Sykorova; Jiri Benes
Journal:  Int J Infect Dis       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile infection in adults: 2010 update by the society for healthcare epidemiology of America (SHEA) and the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA).

Authors:  Stuart H Cohen; Dale N Gerding; Stuart Johnson; Ciaran P Kelly; Vivian G Loo; L Clifford McDonald; Jacques Pepin; Mark H Wilcox
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.254

4.  Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for infection with Clostridium difficile in Europe, Canada, and the USA: a double-blind, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Oliver A Cornely; Derrick W Crook; Roberto Esposito; André Poirier; Michael S Somero; Karl Weiss; Pamela Sears; Sherwood Gorbach
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 25.071

5.  Effectiveness of fidaxomicin versus oral vancomycin in the treatment of recurrent clostridioides difficile.

Authors:  Alyssa Rinaldi; Erica E Reed; Kurt B Stevenson; Kelci Coe; Jessica M Smith
Journal:  J Clin Pharm Ther       Date:  2021-02-20       Impact factor: 2.512

6.  Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection: meta-analysis of pivotal randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Derrick W Crook; A Sarah Walker; Yin Kean; Karl Weiss; Oliver A Cornely; Mark A Miller; Roberto Esposito; Thomas J Louie; Nicole E Stoesser; Bernadette C Young; Brian J Angus; Sherwood L Gorbach; Timothy E A Peto
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 7.  Clostridium difficile infection seasonality: patterns across hemispheres and continents - a systematic review.

Authors:  Luis Furuya-Kanamori; Samantha J McKenzie; Laith Yakob; Justin Clark; David L Paterson; Thomas V Riley; Archie C Clements
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Clostridium difficile infection in the elderly: an update on management.

Authors:  Tomefa E Asempa; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 4.458

9.  Attributable Healthcare Resource Utilization and Costs for Patients With Primary and Recurrent Clostridium difficile Infection in the United States.

Authors:  Dongmu Zhang; Vimalanand S Prabhu; Stephen W Marcella
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 10.  Cost of hospital management of Clostridium difficile infection in United States-a meta-analysis and modelling study.

Authors:  Shanshan Zhang; Sarah Palazuelos-Munoz; Evelyn M Balsells; Harish Nair; Ayman Chit; Moe H Kyaw
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 3.090

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.