Tomasz M Beer1, Neal Shore2, Alicia Morgans3, Kerri Winters-Stone1, Jeffrey S Wefel4, Daniel J George5. 1. Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute Portland Oregon USA. 2. Carolina Urologic Research Center Myrtle Beach South Carolina USA. 3. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Boston Massachusetts USA. 4. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA. 5. Duke Cancer Institute Durham North Carolina USA.
Abstract
Context: Second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors (ARIs) extend metastasis-free survival, prolong overall survival, and delay symptoms when added to androgen deprivation therapy for the treatment of castration-sensitive or castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). However, ARIs may adversely impact physical and cognitive function, thereby decreasing quality of life and prognosis. Objective: To evaluate the evidence regarding the potential effects of ARIs on physical and cognitive function and to contextualize how drug-related adverse effects may influence treatment decisions in CRPC. Evidence acquisition: We performed a literature search using MEDLINE from January 1998 to June 2020 using terms relating to prostate cancer, androgen deprivation, and physical and cognitive function. We selected 61 publications for analysis. Evidence synthesis: Treatment-induced deterioration in physical and cognitive function may impair the independence and well-being of patients with CRPC. Patient-reported outcomes from clinical trials of ARIs provide quantitative evidence of their impact on these domains, which appears to vary between ARIs, reflecting the different adverse event profiles of these agents. Thus, the risk of physical or cognitive dysfunction may be managed or mitigated by appropriate selection of treatment options. Studies in patients with CRPC have assessed the cognitive effects of ARIs with validated instruments, whereas quantitative analysis of the impact on physical function has been limited. Conclusion: Several validated instruments utilized for the assessment of physical and cognitive function in clinical studies have been adapted for clinical practice; however, consensus on the standardization of these assessments is required. Future clinical studies employing validated tools may generate data on the impact of ARIs and guide treatment decisions for patients with CRPC. Patient summary: We review the hormonal therapies used to treat men with prostate cancer and the effects they have on physical and cognitive function. We discuss how to measure these effects and how this may assist when choosing treatment.
Context: Second-generation androgen receptor inhibitors (ARIs) extend metastasis-free survival, prolong overall survival, and delay symptoms when added to androgen deprivation therapy for the treatment of castration-sensitive or castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). However, ARIs may adversely impact physical and cognitive function, thereby decreasing quality of life and prognosis. Objective: To evaluate the evidence regarding the potential effects of ARIs on physical and cognitive function and to contextualize how drug-related adverse effects may influence treatment decisions in CRPC. Evidence acquisition: We performed a literature search using MEDLINE from January 1998 to June 2020 using terms relating to prostate cancer, androgen deprivation, and physical and cognitive function. We selected 61 publications for analysis. Evidence synthesis: Treatment-induced deterioration in physical and cognitive function may impair the independence and well-being of patients with CRPC. Patient-reported outcomes from clinical trials of ARIs provide quantitative evidence of their impact on these domains, which appears to vary between ARIs, reflecting the different adverse event profiles of these agents. Thus, the risk of physical or cognitive dysfunction may be managed or mitigated by appropriate selection of treatment options. Studies in patients with CRPC have assessed the cognitive effects of ARIs with validated instruments, whereas quantitative analysis of the impact on physical function has been limited. Conclusion: Several validated instruments utilized for the assessment of physical and cognitive function in clinical studies have been adapted for clinical practice; however, consensus on the standardization of these assessments is required. Future clinical studies employing validated tools may generate data on the impact of ARIs and guide treatment decisions for patients with CRPC. Patient summary: We review the hormonal therapies used to treat men with prostate cancer and the effects they have on physical and cognitive function. We discuss how to measure these effects and how this may assist when choosing treatment.
Authors: Dennis R Taaffe; Robert U Newton; Nigel Spry; David Joseph; Suzanne K Chambers; Robert A Gardiner; Brad A Wall; Prue Cormie; Kate A Bolam; Daniel A Galvão Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2017-02-27 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Matthew R Smith; Fred Saad; Simon Chowdhury; Stéphane Oudard; Boris A Hadaschik; Julie N Graff; David Olmos; Paul N Mainwaring; Ji Youl Lee; Hiroji Uemura; Peter De Porre; Andressa A Smith; Sabine D Brookman-May; Susan Li; Ke Zhang; Brendan Rooney; Angela Lopez-Gitlitz; Eric J Small Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2020-09-06 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Arti Hurria; Brenna C McDonald; Andrew J Saykin; Robert A Stern; John W VanMeter; Meghan McGuckin; Tiffani Traina; Neelima Denduluri; Scott Turner; Darlene Howard; Paul B Jacobsen; Tim Ahles Journal: Semin Oncol Date: 2013-12 Impact factor: 4.929
Authors: Anu-Maarit Moilanen; Reetta Riikonen; Riikka Oksala; Laura Ravanti; Eija Aho; Gerd Wohlfahrt; Pirjo S Nykänen; Olli P Törmäkangas; Jorma J Palvimo; Pekka J Kallio Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-07-03 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Gülistan Bahat; Jürgen Bauer; Yves Boirie; Olivier Bruyère; Tommy Cederholm; Cyrus Cooper; Francesco Landi; Yves Rolland; Avan Aihie Sayer; Stéphane M Schneider; Cornel C Sieber; Eva Topinkova; Maurits Vandewoude; Marjolein Visser; Mauro Zamboni Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Floor J E Lubberman; Guillemette E Benoist; Winald Gerritsen; David M Burger; Niven Mehra; Paul Hamberg; Inge van Oort; Nielka P van Erp Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2019-09-12 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Herta H Chao; Sien Hu; Jaime S Ide; Edward Uchio; Sheng Zhang; Michal Rose; John Concato; Chiang-Shan R Li Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-08-19 Impact factor: 3.240