Matthew R Smith1, Fred Saad2, Simon Chowdhury3, Stéphane Oudard4, Boris A Hadaschik5, Julie N Graff6, David Olmos7, Paul N Mainwaring8, Ji Youl Lee9, Hiroji Uemura10, Peter De Porre11, Andressa A Smith12, Sabine D Brookman-May13, Susan Li12, Ke Zhang14, Brendan Rooney15, Angela Lopez-Gitlitz16, Eric J Small17. 1. Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. Electronic address: MRSMITH@mgh.harvard.edu. 2. Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada. 3. Guy's, King's, and St. Thomas' Hospitals, and Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, UK. 4. Georges Pompidou Hospital, University de Paris, Paris, France. 5. University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, and Ruprecht-Karls University Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany. 6. VA Portland Health Care System, Portland and Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA. 7. Spanish National Cancer Research Centre (CNIO), Madrid and Biomedical Research Institute of Málaga (IBIMA), Spain. 8. Canossa Hospital, Oxley, Queensland, Australia. 9. St. Mary's Hospital of Catholic University, Seoul, South Korea. 10. Yokohama City University Medical Center, Yokohama, Japan. 11. Janssen Research & Development, Beerse, Belgium. 12. Janssen Research & Development, Spring House, PA, USA. 13. Janssen Research & Development, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Ludwig Maximilians University, Munich, Germany. 14. Janssen Research & Development, San Diego, CA, USA. 15. Janssen Research & Development, High Wycombe, UK. 16. Janssen Research & Development, Los Angeles, CA, USA. 17. Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The phase 3 SPARTAN study evaluated apalutamide versus placebo in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) and prostate-specific antigen doubling time of ≤10 mo. At primary analysis, apalutamide improved median metastasis-free survival (MFS) by 2 yr and overall survival (OS) data were immature. OBJECTIVE: We report the prespecified event-driven final analysis for OS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1207 patients with nmCRPC (diagnosed by conventional imaging) were randomised 2:1 to apalutamide (240mg/d) or placebo, plus on-going androgen deprivation therapy. After MFS was met and the study was unblinded, 76 (19%) patients still receiving placebo crossed over to apalutamide. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: OS and time to cytotoxic chemotherapy (TTChemo) were analysed by group-sequential testing with O'Brien-Fleming-type alpha spending function. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: At median 52-mo follow-up, 428 deaths had occurred. The median treatment duration was 32.9 mo for apalutamide group and 11.5 mo for placebo group. Median OS was markedly longer with apalutamide versus placebo, reaching prespecified statistical significance (73.9 vs 59.9 mo, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.78 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.64-0.96]; p=0.016). Apalutamide also lengthened TTChemo versus placebo (HR: 0.63 [95% CI, 0.49-0.81]; p=0.0002). Discontinuation rates in apalutamide and placebo groups due to progressive disease were 43% and 74%, and due to adverse events 15% and 8.4%, respectively. Subsequent life-prolonging therapy was received by 371 (46%) patients in the apalutamide arm and by 338 (84%) patients in the placebo arm including 59 patients who received apalutamide after crossover. Safety was consistent with previous reports; when adverse events were adjusted for treatment exposure, rash had the greatest difference of incidence between the apalutamide and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Extension of OS with apalutamide compared with placebo conferred impactful benefit in patients with nmCRPC. There was a 22% reduction in the hazard of death in the apalutamide group despite 19% crossover (placebo to apalutamide) and higher rates of subsequent therapy in the placebo group. PATIENT SUMMARY: With data presented herein, all primary and secondary study end points of SPARTAN were met; findings demonstrate the value of apalutamide as a treatment option for nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
BACKGROUND: The phase 3 SPARTAN study evaluated apalutamide versus placebo in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) and prostate-specific antigen doubling time of ≤10 mo. At primary analysis, apalutamide improved median metastasis-free survival (MFS) by 2 yr and overall survival (OS) data were immature. OBJECTIVE: We report the prespecified event-driven final analysis for OS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1207 patients with nmCRPC (diagnosed by conventional imaging) were randomised 2:1 to apalutamide (240mg/d) or placebo, plus on-going androgen deprivation therapy. After MFS was met and the study was unblinded, 76 (19%) patients still receiving placebo crossed over to apalutamide. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: OS and time to cytotoxic chemotherapy (TTChemo) were analysed by group-sequential testing with O'Brien-Fleming-type alpha spending function. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: At median 52-mo follow-up, 428 deaths had occurred. The median treatment duration was 32.9 mo for apalutamide group and 11.5 mo for placebo group. Median OS was markedly longer with apalutamide versus placebo, reaching prespecified statistical significance (73.9 vs 59.9 mo, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.78 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.64-0.96]; p=0.016). Apalutamide also lengthened TTChemo versus placebo (HR: 0.63 [95% CI, 0.49-0.81]; p=0.0002). Discontinuation rates in apalutamide and placebo groups due to progressive disease were 43% and 74%, and due to adverse events 15% and 8.4%, respectively. Subsequent life-prolonging therapy was received by 371 (46%) patients in the apalutamide arm and by 338 (84%) patients in the placebo arm including 59 patients who received apalutamide after crossover. Safety was consistent with previous reports; when adverse events were adjusted for treatment exposure, rash had the greatest difference of incidence between the apalutamide and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Extension of OS with apalutamide compared with placebo conferred impactful benefit in patients with nmCRPC. There was a 22% reduction in the hazard of death in the apalutamide group despite 19% crossover (placebo to apalutamide) and higher rates of subsequent therapy in the placebo group. PATIENT SUMMARY: With data presented herein, all primary and secondary study end points of SPARTAN were met; findings demonstrate the value of apalutamide as a treatment option for nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.
Authors: Rushikesh Potdar; Benjamin A Gartrell; Robert Given; Lawrence Karsh; Jeffrey Frankel; Karen Nenno; Kris O'MalleyLeFebvre; Amitabha Bhaumik; Sharon McCarthy; Tracy McGowan; Christopher Pieczonka Journal: Am J Cancer Res Date: 2022-01-15 Impact factor: 6.166
Authors: Melania Rivano; Luca Cancanelli; Lorenzo Di Spazio; Daniele Mengato; Marco Chiumente; Andrea Messori Journal: World J Urol Date: 2022-09-09 Impact factor: 3.661
Authors: Lin Wang; Channing Paller; Hwanhee Hong; Lori Rosman; Anthony De Felice; Otis Brawley; G Caleb Alexander Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2022-02-07 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Felipe Moraes Toledo Pereira; Adriano Gonçalves E Silva; Aldo Lourenço Abbade Dettino; Ana Paula Garcia Cardoso; Andre Deeke Sasse; Ariel Galapo Kann; Carlos Dzik; Daniel Herchenhorn; Denis Leonardo Fontes Jardim; Diego Lopera; Mouna Ayadi; Pamela Salman; Ray Antonio Manneh Kopp; Ricardo Saraiva De Carvalho; Sandro Roberto De Araujo Cavallero; Sergio Aguiar; Vinicius Carrera Souza; Pedro Luiz Serrano Uson Junior; Andrey Soares Journal: JCO Glob Oncol Date: 2021-04
Authors: Mark P Labrecque; Joshi J Alumkal; Ilsa M Coleman; Peter S Nelson; Colm Morrissey Journal: Endocr Relat Cancer Date: 2021-07-15 Impact factor: 5.900
Authors: Daniel E Spratt; Neal Shore; Oliver Sartor; Dana Rathkopf; Kara Olivier Journal: Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis Date: 2021-02-18 Impact factor: 5.554