Literature DB >> 36266303

Multi-species occupancy modeling suggests interspecific interaction among the three ungulate species.

Hemant Singh1,2, Amira Sharief1,3, Bheem Dutt Joshi1, Vineet Kumar1, Tanoy Mukherjee1, Kailash Chandra1, Nitin Bhardwaj2, Mukesh Thakur1, Lalit Kumar Sharma4.   

Abstract

Species with sympatric distribution influence ecosystem dynamics and are impacted by the presence of other co-existing species. Assessing the coexistence and the role of interspecific interactions with the landscape variables is necessary to know the species co-occurrence in space. In the Indian Himalayan region, such studies are completely lacking due to limited efforts being made, mainly because of complex terrains and inaccessible landscape features. We used camera trapping and sign survey in a multi-species occupancy framework to understand the influence of environmental variables on occupancy and detection probability of species-specific and pair-wise interaction of the three ungulates in Uttarkashi. Our results concluded that individual species' occupancy probabilities were related both to the environmental variables and the presence or absence of other interacting species. Our top model showed evidence of interspecific interaction among species pairs, and the occupancy probability of species one varied in the presence or absence of another species. The overall activity patterns were similar among all the three species and were found active throughout the day. The activity overlap between sambar-barking deer (Dhat1 value = 0.85) was considerably higher than barking deer-goral (Dhat1 value = 0.78). The findings of the present study will be useful for the conservation and management of ungulates in the Indian Himalayan and adjoining regions.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36266303      PMCID: PMC9584884          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20953-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.996


  12 in total

1.  A new parameterization for estimating co-occurrence of interacting species.

Authors:  J Hardin Waddle; Robert M Dorazio; Susan C Walls; Kenneth G Rice; Jeff Beauchamp; Melinda J Schuman; Frank J Mazzotti
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 4.657

2.  Snake co-occurrence patterns are best explained by habitat and hypothesized effects of interspecific interactions.

Authors:  David A Steen; Christopher J W McClure; Jean C Brock; D Craig Rudolph; Josh B Pierce; James R Lee; W Jeffrey Humphries; Beau B Gregory; William B Sutton; Lora L Smith; Danna L Baxley; Dirk J Stevenson; Craig Guyer
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 5.091

3.  Estimating species richness and accumulation by modeling species occurrence and detectability.

Authors:  Robert M Dorazio; J Andrew Royle; Bo Söderström; Anders Glimskär
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.499

Review 4.  Considering ecological dynamics in resource selection functions.

Authors:  Philip D McLoughlin; Douglas W Morris; Daniel Fortin; Eric Vander Wal; Adrienne L Contasti
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 5.091

5.  Ecology. Threats from India's Himalaya dams.

Authors:  R Edward Grumbine; Maharaj K Pandit
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Predicting spacing behavior and mating systems of solitary cervids: a study of hog deer and Indian muntjac.

Authors:  Morten Odden; Per Wegge
Journal:  Zoology (Jena)       Date:  2007-07-05       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  A two-species occupancy model accommodating simultaneous spatial and interspecific dependence.

Authors:  Christopher T Rota; Christopher K Wikle; Roland W Kays; Tavis D Forrester; William J McShea; Arielle W Parsons; Joshua J Millspaugh
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.499

8.  Habitat and introduced predators influence the occupancy of small threatened macropods in subtropical Australia.

Authors:  Darren McHugh; Ross L Goldingay; Jeremy Link; Mike Letnic
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-04-29       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  The status of wildlife in protected areas compared to non-protected areas of Kenya.

Authors:  David Western; Samantha Russell; Innes Cuthill
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The influence of interspecific interactions on species range expansion rates.

Authors:  Jens-Christian Svenning; Dominique Gravel; Robert D Holt; Frank M Schurr; Wilfried Thuiller; Tamara Münkemüller; Katja H Schiffers; Stefan Dullinger; Thomas C Edwards; Thomas Hickler; Steven I Higgins; Julia E M S Nabel; Jörn Pagel; Signe Normand
Journal:  Ecography       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 5.992

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.