Literature DB >> 36264867

Why are they eco-friendly? Attributing eco-friendly descriptive norms to intrinsic motivation increases pro-environmental purchase intention.

Emma Ejelöv1,2, Magnus Bergquist1,2, André Hansla1,2, Andreas Nilsson1,2.   

Abstract

People perform pro-environmental behaviors not only out of intrinsic motivation, but also due to external factors such as expected social approval or financial gain. To the extent that people use their own motivations to infer the motivation of others, people may view descriptive norms favoring pro-environmental behavior as extrinsically motivated. This may in turn decrease the normative influence of the norm, as conformity can be negatively affected by perceptions that others are conforming mindlessly. While descriptive norms generally promote pro-environmental behavior change, the influential power of descriptive norms varies between studies. One possible explanation for these inconclusive findings is that people interpret others' behavior as either intrinsically- or extrinsically motivated. We propose that pro-environmental descriptive norms will be more influential when attributing others' pro-environmental behavior as intrinsically (e.g., pleasure of contributing to the environment) rather than extrinsically, motivated (e.g., fear of social disapproval). In two experiments (N = 1326), we compared participants' intention to purchase pro-environmental products between four conditions: control condition vs intrinsic norm vs extrinsic norm (Exp. 1) vs injunctive norm (Exp. 2). Results consistently found a significant increase in pro-environmental purchase intention in the intrinsic norm condition compared to both extrinsic norm condition (Exp. 2) and no-information control condition (Exp. 1 & 2). These studies highlight that attribution of behavior is vital for the adoption of pro-environmental norms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36264867      PMCID: PMC9584366          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0265839

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


  16 in total

1.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being.

Authors:  R M Ryan; E L Deci
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2000-01

2.  The silence of the library: environment, situational norm, and social behavior.

Authors:  Henk Aarts; Ap Dijksterhuis
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-01

3.  Normative social influence is underdetected.

Authors:  Jessica M Nolan; P Wesley Schultz; Robert B Cialdini; Noah J Goldstein; Vladas Griskevicius
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2008-07

4.  Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task.

Authors:  S Moscovici; E Lage; M Naffrechoux
Journal:  Sociometry       Date:  1969-12

5.  Normative prompts reduce consumer food waste in restaurants.

Authors:  Sabrina Stöckli; Michael Dorn; Stefan Liechti
Journal:  Waste Manag       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 7.145

Review 6.  The correspondence bias.

Authors:  D T Gilbert; P S Malone
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 17.737

7.  Goal contagion: perceiving is for pursuing.

Authors:  Henk Aarts; Peter M Gollwitzer; Ran R Hassin
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2004-07

8.  Alone in a crowd of sheep: asymmetric perceptions of conformity and their roots in an introspection illusion.

Authors:  Emily Pronin; Jonah Berger; Sarah Molouki
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2007-04

9.  Prosocial Conformity: Prosocial Norms Generalize Across Behavior and Empathy.

Authors:  Erik C Nook; Desmond C Ong; Sylvia A Morelli; Jason P Mitchell; Jamil Zaki
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Bull       Date:  2016-05-26

10.  A room with a viewpoint revisited: descriptive norms and hotel guests' towel reuse behavior.

Authors:  Gerd Bohner; Lena E Schlüter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.