Literature DB >> 7870861

The correspondence bias.

D T Gilbert1, P S Malone.   

Abstract

The correspondence bias is the tendency to draw inferences about a person's unique and enduring dispositions from behaviors that can be entirely explained by the situations in which they occur. Although this tendency is one of the most fundamental phenomena in social psychology, its causes and consequences remain poorly understood. This article sketches an intellectual history of the correspondence bias as an evolving problem in social psychology, describes 4 mechanisms (lack of awareness, unrealistic expectations, inflated categorizations, and incomplete corrections) that produce distinct forms of correspondence bias, and discusses how the consequences of correspondence-biased inferences may perpetuate such inferences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7870861     DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.117.1.21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Bull        ISSN: 0033-2909            Impact factor:   17.737


  87 in total

1.  Why fallout from whistleblowing is hard to avoid. Commentary on "The fallout: what happens to whistleblowers and those accused but exonerated of scientific misconduct" (J.S. Lubalin and J.L. Matheson)

Authors:  Joan E Sieber
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Top performers are not the most impressive when extreme performance indicates unreliability.

Authors:  Jerker Denrell; Chengwei Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Cultural neuroscience of the self: understanding the social grounding of the brain.

Authors:  Shinobu Kitayama; Jiyoung Park
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.436

4.  Provider and recipient factors that may moderate the effectiveness of received support: examining the effects of relationship quality and expectations for support on behavioral and cardiovascular reactions.

Authors:  Maija Reblin; Bert N Uchino; Timothy W Smith
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2010-06-22

5.  Beliefs about behavior account for age differences in the correspondence bias.

Authors:  Jennifer Tehan Stanley; Fredda Blanchard-Fields
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 4.077

6.  Judgments of cause and blame: sensitivity to intentionality in Asperger's syndrome.

Authors:  Shelley Channon; David Lagnado; Sian Fitzpatrick; Helena Drury; Isabelle Taylor
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2011-11

7.  Revisiting a Constructive Classic: Wright's Physical Disability: A Psychosocial Approach.

Authors:  Dana S Dunn; Timothy R Elliott
Journal:  Rehabil Psychol       Date:  2005-05

Review 8.  Message design strategies to raise public awareness of social determinants of health and population health disparities.

Authors:  Jeff Niederdeppe; Q Lisa Bu; Porismita Borah; David A Kindig; Stephanie A Robert
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 4.911

9.  Social cognition and the brain: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Frank Van Overwalle
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.038

10.  Stereotype content model across cultures: towards universal similarities and some differences.

Authors:  Amy J C Cuddy; Susan T Fiske; Virginia S Y Kwan; Peter Glick; Stéphanie Demoulin; Jacques-Philippe Leyens; Michael Harris Bond; Jean-Claude Croizet; Naomi Ellemers; Ed Sleebos; Tin Tin Htun; Hyun-Jeong Kim; Greg Maio; Judi Perry; Kristina Petkova; Valery Todorov; Rosa Rodríguez-Bailón; Elena Morales; Miguel Moya; Marisol Palacios; Vanessa Smith; Rolando Perez; Jorge Vala; Rene Ziegler
Journal:  Br J Soc Psychol       Date:  2009-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.