Literature DB >> 36264403

Perceived Barriers to Climate Change Activism Behaviors in the United States Among Individuals Highly Concerned about Climate Change.

Carl Latkin1, Lauren Dayton2, Haley Bonneau2, Ananya Bhaktaram2, Julia Ross3, Jessica Pugel4, Megan Weil Latshaw5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is a tremendous gap between the proportion of the population expressing concern about climate change and those engaged in climate change activism. We examined barriers to climate change activism among respondents stating climate change was an important issue to them.
METHODS: Participants in a national online longitudinal study reported on 12 reasons for lack of involvement in climate change actions. Five months later, engagement in six climate change actions was assessed. The primary analyses focused on the 319 respondents who, out of 592 respondents who participated in both surveys, reported that the issue of global warming was extremely or very important to them.
RESULTS: Participants showed a range of engagement in climate change activism behaviors: 29.8% donated money to an organization to reduce climate change, 32.3% signed a petition, 69.0% voted for candidates who support measures to reduce climate change, 11.9% wrote letters, e-mailed, or phoned government officials to urge them to take action, and 9.4% volunteered with organizations working to curb climate change. The median number of barriers was 5. The most frequent reasons for lack of involvement in climate change activism were other people are better at it (57.4%), hadn't been trained (56.7%), hadn't been asked (50.8%), not knowing how to get involved (49.8%), activities like letter writing not appealing (49.8%), too busy (38.9%), organizations would ask them for money (39.8%), and not encouraged to become involved (38.2%). Several barriers were associated with engagement in climate change activism five months later. The most consistent association with activism was with talking about climate change in the prior month.
CONCLUSION: Most respondents cited several barriers that impeded their involvement in climate change activism. Select barriers were associated with reduced engagement in activism. Organizations that address climate change should acknowledge barriers but emphasize that individuals can engage in climate change activism regardless of barriers.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Climate change; activism; barriers; collective action; communication

Year:  2022        PMID: 36264403      PMCID: PMC9584242          DOI: 10.1007/s10935-022-00704-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prev (2022)        ISSN: 2731-5533


  10 in total

1.  An actor-network theory analysis of policy innovation for smoke-free places: understanding change in complex systems.

Authors:  David Young; Ron Borland; Ken Coghill
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 2.  Conducting Clinical Research Using Crowdsourced Convenience Samples.

Authors:  Jesse Chandler; Danielle Shapiro
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 18.561

3.  The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation.

Authors:  Robert Gifford
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2011 May-Jun

Review 4.  The use of crowdsourcing in addiction science research: Amazon Mechanical Turk.

Authors:  Justin C Strickland; William W Stoops
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 5.  Does heightening risk appraisals change people's intentions and behavior? A meta-analysis of experimental studies.

Authors:  Paschal Sheeran; Peter R Harris; Tracy Epton
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Hale and Hearty Policies: How Psychological Science Can Create and Maintain Healthy Habits.

Authors:  Alexander J Rothman; Peter M Gollwitzer; Adam M Grant; David T Neal; Paschal Sheeran; Wendy Wood
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-11

7.  Demographic Stability on Mechanical Turk Despite COVID-19.

Authors:  Aaron J Moss; Cheskie Rosenzweig; Jonathan Robinson; Leib Litman
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Discussing global warming leads to greater acceptance of climate science.

Authors:  Matthew H Goldberg; Sander van der Linden; Edward Maibach; Anthony Leiserowitz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Views of health professionals on climate change and health: a multinational survey study.

Authors:  John Kotcher; Edward Maibach; Jeni Miller; Eryn Campbell; Lujain Alqodmani; Marina Maiero; Arthur Wyns
Journal:  Lancet Planet Health       Date:  2021-04-08

10.  Mapping of Crowdsourcing in Health: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Perrine Créquit; Ghizlène Mansouri; Mehdi Benchoufi; Alexandre Vivot; Philippe Ravaud
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 5.428

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.