Literature DB >> 21553954

The dragons of inaction: psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation.

Robert Gifford1.   

Abstract

Most people think climate change and sustainability are important problems, but too few global citizens engaged in high-greenhouse-gas-emitting behavior are engaged in enough mitigating behavior to stem the increasing flow of greenhouse gases and other environmental problems. Why is that? Structural barriers such as a climate-averse infrastructure are part of the answer, but psychological barriers also impede behavioral choices that would facilitate mitigation, adaptation, and environmental sustainability. Although many individuals are engaged in some ameliorative action, most could do more, but they are hindered by seven categories of psychological barriers, or "dragons of inaction": limited cognition about the problem, ideological world views that tend to preclude pro-environmental attitudes and behavior, comparisons with key other people, sunk costs and behavioral momentum, discredence toward experts and authorities, perceived risks of change, and positive but inadequate behavior change. Structural barriers must be removed wherever possible, but this is unlikely to be sufficient. Psychologists must work with other scientists, technical experts, and policymakers to help citizens overcome these psychological barriers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21553954     DOI: 10.1037/a0023566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Psychol        ISSN: 0003-066X


  82 in total

Review 1.  Communicating about ocean health: theoretical and practical considerations.

Authors:  Jonathon P Schuldt; Katherine A McComas; Sahara E Byrne
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Visiting a climate-influenced national park: the stability of climate change perceptions.

Authors:  Matthew Tyler James Brownlee; Jeffrey C Hallo; Brett A Wright; Dewayne Moore; Robert B Powell
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 3.  Navigating cognition biases in the search of sustainability.

Authors:  John-Oliver Engler; David J Abson; Henrik von Wehrden
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 5.129

4.  Positive associations of optimism-pessimism orientation with pro-environmental behavior and subjective well-being: a longitudinal study on quality of life and everyday behavior.

Authors:  Naoko Kaida; Kosuke Kaida
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2019-08-17       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Understanding and applying principles of social cognition and decision making in adaptive environmental governance.

Authors:  Daniel A DeCaro; Craig Anthony Tony Arnol; Emmanuel Frimpong Boama; Ahjond S Garmestani
Journal:  Ecol Soc       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 4.403

6.  Reducing the risks of extreme heat for seniors: communicating risks and building resilience.

Authors:  Allison Eady; Bianca Dreyer; Brandon Hey; Manuel Riemer; Anne Wilson
Journal:  Health Promot Chronic Dis Prev Can       Date:  2020-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The neurobiology of climate change.

Authors:  Sean O'Donnell
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2018-01-06

8.  Out of sight, out of mind: participatory sensing for monitoring indoor air quality.

Authors:  Àlex Boso; Boris Álvarez; Christian Oltra; Jaime Garrido; Carlos Muñoz; Álvaro Hofflinger
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.513

9.  Finding shared meaning in the Anthropocene: engaging diverse perspectives on climate change.

Authors:  Gail Hochachka
Journal:  Sustain Sci       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 10.  Climate change: challenges and opportunities for global health.

Authors:  Jonathan A Patz; Howard Frumkin; Tracey Holloway; Daniel J Vimont; Andrew Haines
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.