Literature DB >> 36264343

Comparative study of the modified VISTA technique (m-VISTA) versus the coronally advanced flap (CAF) in the treatment of multiple Miller class III/RT2 recessions: a randomized clinical trial.

Aitziber Fernández-Jiménez1, Ruth Estefanía-Fresco1, Ana María García-De-La-Fuente2, Xabier Marichalar-Mendia3, José Manuel Aguirre-Urizar1, Luis Antonio Aguirre-Zorzano1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare the percentage of mean root coverage (MRC%) obtained in the treatment of multiple Miller class III/RT2 gingival recessions using the modified VISTA (m-VISTA) technique versus the coronally advanced flap (CAF) technique, using a connective tissue graft (CTG) in both cases.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients were randomly treated with m-VISTA (test group (TG) = 12) or CAF (control group (CG) = 12). A calibrated, experienced, and blinded examiner collected data related to multiple periodontal clinical variables, especially the recession (REC) in order to calculate the MRC% at 6 and 12 months, which was the primary outcome of the study. Also, the radiological bone level, the characteristics of the CTG, and postsurgical incidences were assessed. Finally, a descriptive and an analytical statistical analysis of the variables and their associations was performed.
RESULTS: The recessions (n = 84) were located mainly in the mandible (n = 65) and in posterior sectors (premolars: n = 35; molars: n = 8). At 6 months, the MRC% was 61% (2 mm) for both study groups, and at 12 months, it increased to 73.26% (2.11 mm) in the TG and decreased to 56.49% (1.78 mm) in the CG.
CONCLUSION: When approaching multiple Miller class III/RT2 recessions, there were no statistically significant differences in the MRC% at 6 and 12 months between the group treated with the m-VISTA technique and the group treated with the CAF. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The characteristics of the m-VISTA technique, such as the closed approach, the mobilization of the papilla, and the coronal stabilization of the CTG, could facilitate the maturation of the tissues in the treatment of Miller class III/RT2 recessions. This would favor better root coverage. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03258996.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trial; Connective tissue; Gingival Recessions; Plastic surgery

Year:  2022        PMID: 36264343     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-022-04746-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.606


  42 in total

Review 1.  Localized gingival recessions: 1. Etiology and prevalence.

Authors:  E A Guinard; R G Caffesse
Journal:  J West Soc Periodontol Periodontal Abstr       Date:  1977

2.  A comparative study of root coverage using two different acellular dermal matrix products.

Authors:  Thomas S Barker; Marco A Cueva; Francisco Rivera-Hidalgo; M Miles Beach; Jeffrey A Rossmann; David G Kerns; T Bradley Crump; Jay D Shulman
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 6.993

3.  Application of subepithelial connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a split-mouth randomized study.

Authors:  Paulo S G Henriques; André A Pelegrine; Ana A Nogueira; Mônica M Borghi
Journal:  J Oral Sci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.556

4.  Prevalence of oral soft and hard tissue lesions related to mechanical toothcleansing procedures.

Authors:  G Sangnes; P Gjermo
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 3.383

Review 5.  Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a systematic review from the AAP Regeneration Workshop.

Authors:  Leandro Chambrone; Dimitris N Tatakis
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 6.993

6.  Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a consensus report from the AAP Regeneration Workshop.

Authors:  Dimitris N Tatakis; Leandro Chambrone; Edward P Allen; Burton Langer; Michael K McGuire; Christopher R Richardson; Ion Zabalegui; Homayoun H Zadeh
Journal:  J Periodontol       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 6.993

7.  A classification of marginal tissue recession.

Authors:  P D Miller
Journal:  Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  The interproximal clinical attachment level to classify gingival recessions and predict root coverage outcomes: an explorative and reliability study.

Authors:  Francesco Cairo; Michele Nieri; Sandro Cincinelli; Jana Mervelt; Umberto Pagliaro
Journal:  J Clin Periodontol       Date:  2011-04-20       Impact factor: 8.728

9.  Lateral osteoperiosteal flap versus lateral pedicle flap in the treatment of class III gingival recession: A single-center, open-label trial.

Authors:  Yarabham Chakravarthy; Rampalli Viswa Chandra; Aileni Amarender Reddy; Gollapalle Prabhandh Reddy
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2020-06-05

10.  Complete root coverage in the treatment of Miller class III or RT2 gingival recessions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aitziber Fernández-Jiménez; Ana-María García-De-La-Fuente; Ruth Estefanía-Fresco; Xabier Marichalar-Mendia; José-Manuel Aguirre-Urizar; Luis-Antonio Aguirre-Zorzano
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 2.757

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.