Literature DB >> 36264311

A signature of structural MRI features at 3 Tesla allows an accurate characterization of orbital cavernous venous malformation.

Simon Elbaze1, Loïc Duron2, Natasha Mambour3, Mathieu Zmuda3, Sidney Krystal2, Jessica Guillaume4, Julien Savatovsky2, Augustin Lecler2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To differentiate OCVM from other orbital lesions using structural MRI.
METHODS: This IRB-approved a historical-prospective cohort single-center analysis of a prospective cohort that included consecutive adult patients presenting with an orbital lesion undergoing a 3T MRI before surgery from December 2015 to May 2021. Two readers blinded to all data read all MRIs assessing structural MRI characteristics. A univariate analysis followed by a stepwise multivariate analysis identified structural MRI features showing the highest sensitivity and specificity when diagnosing OCVM.
RESULTS: One hundred ninety-one patients with 30/191 (16%) OCVM and 161/191 (84%) other orbital lesions were included. OCVM were significantly more likely to present with a higher signal intensity than that of the cortex on T2WI: 26/29 (89.7%) versus 28/160 (17.5%), p < 0.001, or with a chemical shift artifact (CSA): 26/29 (89.7%) versus 16/155 (10.3%), p < 0.001, or to present with a single starting point of enhancement, as compared to other orbital lesions: 18/29 (62.1%) versus 4/159 (2.5%), p = 0.001. The step-wise analysis identified 2 signatures increasing performances. Signature 1 combined a higher signal intensity than that of the cortex on T2WI and a CSA. Signature 2 included these two features and the presence of a single starting point of enhancement. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 0.83, 0.94, and 0.92 for signature 1 and 0.97, 0.93, and 0.93 for signature 2, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Structural MRI yields high sensitivity and specificity when diagnosing OCVM. KEY POINTS: • Structural MRI shows high sensitivity and specificity when diagnosing orbital cavernous venous malformation. • We identified two signatures combining structural MRI features which might be used easily in routine clinical practice. • The combination of higher signal intensity of the lesion as compared to the cortex on T2WI and of a chemical shift artifact yields a sensitivity and specificity of 0.83 and 0.94 for the diagnosis of orbital cavernous venous malformation, respectively.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Society of Radiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; Magnetic resonance imaging; Orbital neoplasms

Year:  2022        PMID: 36264311     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-022-09163-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   7.034


  19 in total

1.  Serial dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of orbital cavernous hemangioma.

Authors:  K Ohtsuka; M Hashimoto; H Akiba
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 5.258

2.  How is the term haemangioma used in the literature? An evaluation against the revised ISSVA classification.

Authors:  Lloyd Steele; Sarah Zbeidy; Jason Thomson; Carsten Flohr
Journal:  Pediatr Dermatol       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 3.  Cavernous venous malformation (cavernous hemangioma) of the orbit: Current concepts and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Luigi Calandriello; Gabriela Grimaldi; Gianluigi Petrone; Mario Rigante; Sergio Petroni; Monica Riso; Gustavo Savino
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 6.048

Review 4.  Orbital cavernous hemangioma: role of imaging.

Authors:  Sameer A Ansari; Mahmood F Mafee
Journal:  Neuroimaging Clin N Am       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  [Vascular tumours and malformations, classification, pathology and imaging].

Authors:  M Wassef; R Vanwijck; P Clapuyt; L Boon; G Magalon
Journal:  Ann Chir Plast Esthet       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 0.660

6.  Evaluation of MR imaging findings differentiating cavernous haemangiomas from schwannomas in the orbit.

Authors:  Junfang Xian; Zhengyu Zhang; Zhenchang Wang; Jing Li; Bentao Yang; Qinghua Chen; Qinglin Chang; Liyan He
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Radiological Analysis of Orbital Cavernous Hemangiomas: A Review and Comparison Between Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Stephanie Ming Young; Yoon-Duck Kim; Jung Hye Lee; Kyung In Woo
Journal:  J Craniofac Surg       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 1.046

8.  Survey of 1264 patients with orbital tumors and simulating lesions: The 2002 Montgomery Lecture, part 1.

Authors:  Jerry A Shields; Carol L Shields; Richard Scartozzi
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 12.079

9.  Differentiation of cavernous hemangioma from schwannoma of the orbit: a dynamic MRI study.

Authors:  Atsuo Tanaka; Futoshi Mihara; Takashi Yoshiura; Osamu Togao; Yasuo Kuwabara; Yoshihiro Natori; Tomio Sasaki; Hiroshi Honda
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.959

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.