Literature DB >> 29381625

Radiological Analysis of Orbital Cavernous Hemangiomas: A Review and Comparison Between Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Stephanie Ming Young1, Yoon-Duck Kim2, Jung Hye Lee3, Kyung In Woo2.   

Abstract

Cavernous hemangiomas are the most common benign orbital tumors in the orbit, but radiological differentiation from other solitary orbital masses can still be challenging at times. While there have been previous studies describing the radiological characteristics of cavernous hemangiomas on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), there have not been any studies comparing the 2 imaging modalities. The purpose of our study was to evaluate CT and MRI findings of orbital cavernous hemangiomas and compare both modalities.We performed a cross-sectional study of patients with a histopathological diagnosis of cavernous hemangioma over a 20-year period from January 1997 to December 2016 in a single tertiary institution.Our study included 77 patients; mean age was 46.6 ± 11.2 years, and females comprised 68.8%. The lateral orbit (23.4%) was the most common location. The masses were well-defined, with 55.8% being ovoid, 27.3% round, and 16.9% lobulated. The most common enhancement pattern on CT was a small point starting in the periphery, progressing to heterogeneous filling in the late phase. The most common enhancement pattern on MRI was multiple patchy starting points, widespread across the tumor, with a final homogeneous filling in the late phase.Significant differences between CT and MRI were found in terms of area, location, and number of starting points of contrast enhancement in the early phase. We also found that the use of MRI is limited in differentiating fast-filling cavernous hemangiomas from other orbital tumors and in such cases, contrast-enhanced CT would be helpful.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29381625     DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000004291

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  6 in total

1.  Stereotactic gamma knife radiosurgery for orbital cavernous hemangioma: clinical outcome and visual function protection.

Authors:  Hsien-Chung Chen; Chaur-Jong Hu; David Hung-Chi Pan
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2021-01-24       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  A signature of structural MRI features at 3 Tesla allows an accurate characterization of orbital cavernous venous malformation.

Authors:  Simon Elbaze; Loïc Duron; Natasha Mambour; Mathieu Zmuda; Sidney Krystal; Jessica Guillaume; Julien Savatovsky; Augustin Lecler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 7.034

3.  Stereotactic radiosurgery for orbital cavernous venous malformation: a single center's experience for 15 years.

Authors:  Won Jae Lee; Kyung-Rae Cho; Jung-Won Choi; Doo-Sik Kong; Ho Jun Seol; Do-Hyun Nam; Yoon-Duck Kim; Kyung In Woo; Jung-Il Lee
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  Differentiate cavernous hemangioma from schwannoma with artificial intelligence (AI).

Authors:  Shaowei Bi; Rongxin Chen; Kai Zhang; Yifan Xiang; Ruixin Wang; Haotian Lin; Huasheng Yang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-06

5.  Prognosis Analysis and Clinical Features of Orbital Cavernous Venous Malformations With Refractory Insidious Onset.

Authors:  Peng Yang; Yong Li; Hao-Cheng Liu; E Qiu; Jia-Liang Zhang; Jian Ren; Li-Bin Jiang; Hong-Gang Liu; Jun Kang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  Endoscopic transorbital eyelid approach for the removal of an extraconal cavernous venous malformation: Case report.

Authors:  Gianluca Lorenzo Fabozzi; Elena d'Avella; Matias Burroni; Antonio Romano; Luigi Maria Cavallo; Domenico Solari
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-07-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.