Literature DB >> 14641888

Communicating about the risks and benefits of genetically modified foods: the mediating role of trust.

Lynn J Frewer1, Joachim Scholderer, Lone Bredahl.   

Abstract

Recent research suggests that public attitudes toward emerging technologies are mainly driven by trust in the institutions promoting and regulating these technologies. Alternative views maintain that trust should be seen as a consequence rather than a cause of such attitudes. To test its actual role, direct as well as mediating effects of trust were tested in an attitude change experiment involving 1,405 consumers from Denmark, Germany, Italy, and the United Kingdom. After prior attitudes to genetic modification in food production had been assessed, participants received different information materials (either product-specific information or balanced/general information about genetic modification in food production) and were asked to evaluate different types of genetically modified foods (either beer or yoghurt). The information materials were attributed to different information sources (either an industry association, a consumer organization, or a government source). After completion, perceived risk and perceived benefit were assessed, and participants indicated their trust in the information sources to which the materials had been attributed. Direct and trust-mediated attitude change effects were estimated in a multi-sample structural equation model. The results showed that information provision had little effect on people's attitudes toward genetically modified foods, and that perceptions of information source characteristics contributed very little to attitude change. Furthermore, the type of information strategy adopted had almost no impact on postexperimental attitudes. The extent to which people trusted the information sources appeared to be driven by people's attitudes to genetically modified foods, rather than trust influencing the way that people reacted to the information. Trust was not driving risk perception-rather, attitudes were informing perceptions of the motivation of the source providing the information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14641888     DOI: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2003.00385.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  23 in total

1.  Public risk perception and willingness to mitigate climate change: city smog as an example.

Authors:  Weiwei Zhu; Nengzhi Yao; Qiaozhe Guo; Fangbin Wang
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  The Sociocultural Determination of Planned Behaviour.

Authors:  Gordon Sammut; Luke Joseph Buhagiar
Journal:  Integr Psychol Behav Sci       Date:  2017-03

Review 3.  Pharmaceutical Benefit-Risk Communication Tools: A Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Dominic Way; Hortense Blazsin; Ragnar Löfstedt; Frederic Bouder
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  The psychological perspective on the adoption of approved genetically modified crops in the presence of acceptability constraint: the contingent role of passion.

Authors:  Sumran Ali; Muhammad Ghufran; Muhammad Asim Nawaz; Sumaira Nazar Hussain
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2019-11-04       Impact factor: 3.074

5.  Improving RNA content of salt-tolerant Zygosaccharomyces rouxii by atmospheric and room temperature plasma (ARTP) mutagenesis and its application in soy sauce brewing.

Authors:  Jian Guo; Wen Luo; Xue-Ming Wu; Jun Fan; Wen-Xue Zhang; Taikei Suyama
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 3.312

6.  Genetically modified (GM) late blight-resistant potato and consumer attitudes before and after a field visit.

Authors:  Jéssica Bubolz; Patrycja Sleboda; Anna Lehrman; Sven-Ove Hansson; Carl Johan Lagerkvist; Björn Andersson; Marit Lenman; Svante Resjö; Marc Ghislain; Muhammad Awais Zahid; Nam Phuong Kieu; Erik Andreasson
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2022-12-31       Impact factor: 3.118

7.  Communication of Scientific Uncertainty about a Novel Pandemic Health Threat: Ambiguity Aversion and Its Mechanisms.

Authors:  Paul K J Han; Brian J Zikmund-Fisher; Christine W Duarte; Megan Knaus; Adam Black; Aaron M Scherer; Angela Fagerlin
Journal:  J Health Commun       Date:  2018-04-12

8.  Socio-psychological determinants of public acceptance of technologies: A review.

Authors:  Nidhi Gupta; Arnout R H Fischer; Lynn J Frewer
Journal:  Public Underst Sci       Date:  2011-03-01

9.  Consumer intention to purchase GM soybean oil in China: effects of information consistency and source credibility.

Authors:  Mingyang Zhang; Zihao Chen; Yubing Fan; Zhiqiang Cheng; Ting Lv; Yuling Chen
Journal:  GM Crops Food       Date:  2021-01-02       Impact factor: 3.118

10.  Psychological determinants of consumer acceptance of personalised nutrition in 9 European countries.

Authors:  Rui Poínhos; Ivo A van der Lans; Audrey Rankin; Arnout R H Fischer; Brendan Bunting; Sharron Kuznesof; Barbara Stewart-Knox; Lynn J Frewer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.