Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is an effective procedure for correcting biliary obstructions. It can be performed under ultrasound and fluoroscopic equipment; however, it may entail serious complications, including bleeding, caused by arterial or venous injury. We present a 49-year-old man presented with a 1-month history of icterus, jaundice, dark urine, and right hypochondrial pain. MR imaging discovered a dilatation of the right intrahepatic bile duct due to obstruction by intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. PTBD procedure was performed in the right intrahepatic bile duct. After the pigtail drain device was inserted, the bile fluid color that came out from the pigtail turned sanguineous; nonetheless, the patient's hemodynamic was stable. Therefore, the second cholangiography was performed for evaluation. Some resistance was sensed during contrast injection into the bile duct, and the operator pushed the contrast media a little bit stronger and found a filling defect formed by a clot in the bile duct that suggested high suspicion of vessel injury. Although the patient's hemodynamics was still stable, the operator quickly decided to perform a hepatic arteriography procedure because bright red blood through the tube and a relatively rapid clot formed from the puncture point and distal drain, which were signs of hepatic artery injury. Hepatic arteriography confirmed the location of pseudoaneurysm caused by vessel trauma and arterio-intrahepatic bile duct fistulation. The embolization procedure was performed using PVA-300 into a ruptured hepatic artery branch through a microcatheter. Re-evaluation arteriography showed no pseudoaneurysm or arterio-intrahepatic bile duct fistulation after embolization.
Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) is an effective procedure for correcting biliary obstructions. It can be performed under ultrasound and fluoroscopic equipment; however, it may entail serious complications, including bleeding, caused by arterial or venous injury. We present a 49-year-old man presented with a 1-month history of icterus, jaundice, dark urine, and right hypochondrial pain. MR imaging discovered a dilatation of the right intrahepatic bile duct due to obstruction by intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. PTBD procedure was performed in the right intrahepatic bile duct. After the pigtail drain device was inserted, the bile fluid color that came out from the pigtail turned sanguineous; nonetheless, the patient's hemodynamic was stable. Therefore, the second cholangiography was performed for evaluation. Some resistance was sensed during contrast injection into the bile duct, and the operator pushed the contrast media a little bit stronger and found a filling defect formed by a clot in the bile duct that suggested high suspicion of vessel injury. Although the patient's hemodynamics was still stable, the operator quickly decided to perform a hepatic arteriography procedure because bright red blood through the tube and a relatively rapid clot formed from the puncture point and distal drain, which were signs of hepatic artery injury. Hepatic arteriography confirmed the location of pseudoaneurysm caused by vessel trauma and arterio-intrahepatic bile duct fistulation. The embolization procedure was performed using PVA-300 into a ruptured hepatic artery branch through a microcatheter. Re-evaluation arteriography showed no pseudoaneurysm or arterio-intrahepatic bile duct fistulation after embolization.
Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) refers to a biliary obstruction correction procedure that is effective and readily accessible via ultrasound and fluoroscopic equipment [1]. It is a suggested treatment of choice for those who fail to undergo endoscopic retrograde [2], which can be caused by benign etiologies such as cholelithiasis, congenital stenosis, cystic dilations, and others, or malignancy such as cholangiocarcinoma, pancreatic cancer, and Ampulla of Vater cancer [1].PTBD complications include bleeding, bile duct and hepatic artery or portal vein fistulae, pseudoaneurysms, bile leaks, risk of pneumothorax or hemothorax due to transpleural punctures occurring in 8.6%-22% of the procedures [2], and particularly, bleeding due to trauma on arterial or venous vessels [3]. The Society of Interventional Radiology has published a guideline indicating a major bleeding complications rate of 2.5% following PTBD, and a practice review is recommended should the cut-off rate of 5% is exceeded [4].Hepatic artery bleeding following PTBD is marked by the presence of bright red and occasionally pulsatile blood in the tube, sometimes along with hemodynamic instability. Any evidence of abnormalities in the arteries nearby the percutaneous drain must be deemed the bleeding source [5], and such an abnormality should be meticulously catheterized and embellished. If feasible, the hepatic artery embolization should be done from the distal site to its proximal across the injury. Thereafter, the assessment of other potentially masked injuries entailed by prior procedures should be conducted using global arteriography [6,7].
Case description
A 49-year-old man presented with a 1-month history of yellowing of eye and skin, dark urine, and right hypochondrial pain. Examination using ultrasonography found the dilatation of right intrahepatic bile ducts. MR imaging found the dilatation of the right intrahepatic bile duct and no dilatation of the left intrahepatic bile duct. It also showed the contrast-enhanced mass that obstructs the bile duct (Fig. 1). The provisional diagnosis was cholangiocarcinoma. Blood test during admission showed an elevation in direct bilirubin level of 13.8 mg/dl, total bilirubin level of 18.6 mg/dl, platelet count of 216,000, and the prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time value in the normal range.
Bleeding complications succeeding the percutaneous transhepatic biliary drains may occur in the forms of hemothorax, hemoperitoneum, hemobilia, subcapsular hepatic hematoma, melena, and draining site bleeding [5], happening in roughly 2%-3% of patients undergoing transhepatic biliary drainage.In this case study, the patient was admitted with cholangiocarcinoma. MR imaging found the dilatation followed by the abrupt termination of the right intrahepatic bile duct due to obstruction by enhancing mass, leading to a provisional diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma. Our assessment was supported by a laboratory result indicating a direct bilirubin level of 13.8 mg/dl and a total bilirubin level of 18.6 mg/dl. Cholangiocarcinoma is one of the leading causes of obstructive jaundice and biliary strictures [8,9]. Hence, the PTBD procedure was selected to lower the blood bilirubin level.The PTBD procedure was performed 2 days after the admission. We used ultrasound as guidance to identify the nearest and most significant bile duct dilatation and precise puncture location, passing the needle above the rib to avoid the intercostal vessel. Giurazza et al. [10] reported that using ultrasound for evaluating the biliary tree for PTBD was safe and effective with low severity and acceptable rate of complications. However, even though interventional radiologists widely adopt ultrasound imaging modality for multiple percutaneous approaches, it is still operator-dependent; therefore, the visualization accuracy and precise location rely on operator skill.In order to avoid the intercostal vessels and nerves laying under each rib, the puncture site was placed above the rib. Also, the overlaying skin must be inspected for any dilated superficial veins [5]. After the needle puncture, we insert and set the introducer position. Bleeding was suspected if the bile fluid color from the introducer appeared sanguineous or frank blood. In our case, the bile color that comes out from the introducer was yellowish-green; therefore, we concluded that there was no vessel injury. Then, the cholangiography procedure was performed to assess the intrahepatic bile duct branch and the leak of the contrast media. In our case, no filling defect was discovered in the cholangiography procedure (Fig. 2).During the process, the pigtail was inserted and fixated inside the intrahepatic bile duct. Shortly after, however, the bile fluid in the introducer turned into sanguineous color, suggesting a presence of vessel injury. Afterward, the operator performed the second cholangiography procedure with the pigtail still attached to the bile duct.We found a constant filling defect in the intrahepatic bile duct, and some resistance was sensed when pushing the contrast into the bile duct. A filling defect inside the intrahepatic bile duct should be taken into consideration as there might be an arterial injury with a fistula formation toward the bile duct [5]. A filling defect indicated communication between the biliary system and a high-pressure vessel (an artery), provoked by a relatively rapid blood clot formation from the distal to the proximal tract. Gentle contrast injection was not powerful enough to reflux the contrast into the artery to visualize the bile duct [5] (Fig. 3).Hepatic arterial bleeding presented with pulsatile, bright red blood in the drainage pouch, hemodynamic instability, and a notable decline in hematocrit levels [3]; therefore, many operators would directly conduct the arteriography to exclude a notable injury [6]. In our case, the patient's condition was relatively stable, and the operator decided to commence with hepatic arteriography using a femoral approach. Contrast media was injected through the catheter and filled the right hepatic artery and its branches, while some of the contrast pooled at the distal hepatic artery forming a pseudoaneurysm. Contrast also slowly filled the right intrahepatic bile duct branch due to artery-intrahepatic bile duct fistulation (Fig. 4). Some operators may perform arteriography first, especially if the patient is unstable [5]. Hepatic arteriography is performed most commonly from a femoral approach [5]. Arterial injuries include active extravasation, peripheral arterial truncation, arterial transection, pseudoaneurysms, arterioportal fistulae, and, rarely, arterio-hepatic vein fistula [5].The embolization procedure was performed to forestall the bleeding. PVA-300 was used to occlude the fistulation and stop the bleeding, injected into a ruptured hepatic artery branch through a microcatheter (Fig. 5). Upon identifying an arterial injury, the involved vessel should be meticulously catheterized and embellished using coils. Hepatic artery embolization should be performed by inserting the coil into the artery from distal to proximal across the injury to prevent backward bleeding [7,11]. In this case, we used PVA due to coil unavailability in our center. Arteriography was also performed afterwards to exclude pseudoaneurysm, AV fistula, or artery-bile duct fistula. Global arteriography after embolization should be conducted to explore another injury that may have been masked after embolization of the main injury [7,11].
Conclusions
PTBD is an effective procedure for correcting biliary obstructions; however, bleeding could occur as one of its complications in 2.5% of PTBD patients. Hence, it is essential to recognize the early sign and symptoms of the bleeding from physical status and cholangiography. Identifying the signposts of bleeding due to arterial injury with stable hemodynamics leads to faster embolization treatment in a more comfortable environment without worrying about the patient's hemodynamic condition. Hepatic arteriography should be performed once vessel injury is suspected from the transhepatic cholangiography. An embolization procedure was performed to close the fistulation and stop the bleeding, with arteriography performed following the procedure to explore another injury that may have been unmasked after the embolization of the main injury.
Ethic committee approval
This study has met the ethical principle and has already obtained approval from Research Ethics Committee from Dr. Soetomo General Hospital, Surabaya.
Patient consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report.
Authors: Wael E A Saad; Michael J Wallace; Joan C Wojak; Sanjoy Kundu; John F Cardella Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2010-03-21 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Wael E A Saad; Mark G Davies; Deborah J Rubens; Lawrence G Sahler; Nikhil C Patel; David E Lee; Takashi Kitanosono; Talia Sasson; David L Waldman Journal: Vasc Endovascular Surg Date: 2006 Dec-2007 Jan Impact factor: 1.089
Authors: Francesco Giurazza; Fabio Corvino; Andrea Contegiacomo; Paolo Marra; Nicola Maria Lucarelli; Marco Calandri; Mattia Silvestre; Antonio Corvino; Pierleone Lucatelli; Francesco De Cobelli; Raffaella Niola; Maurizio Cariati Journal: J Ultrasound Date: 2019-07-31
Authors: Keith B Quencer; Anthony S Tadros; Keyan B Marashi; Ziga Cizman; Eric Reiner; Ryan O'Hara; Rahmi Oklu Journal: J Clin Med Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 4.241
Authors: Federico Pedersoli; Anja Schröder; Markus Zimmermann; Maximilian Schulze-Hagen; Sebastian Keil; Tom Florian Ulmer; Ulf Peter Neumann; Christiane K Kuhl; Philipp Bruners; Peter Isfort Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2020-10-13 Impact factor: 5.315