Literature DB >> 33051733

Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) in patients with dilated vs. nondilated bile ducts: technical considerations and complications.

Federico Pedersoli1, Anja Schröder2, Markus Zimmermann2, Maximilian Schulze-Hagen2, Sebastian Keil2, Tom Florian Ulmer3, Ulf Peter Neumann3, Christiane K Kuhl2, Philipp Bruners2, Peter Isfort2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare success, technical complexity, and complication rates of percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) in patients with dilated vs. nondilated bile ducts.
METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, we evaluated all consecutive PTBD performed in our department over a period of 5 years. Technical success, technical data (side, fluoroscopy time, radiation dose, amount of contrast media, use of disposable equipment), procedure-related complications and peri-interventional mortality were compared for patients with dilated vs. non-dilated bile ducts. Independent t test and χ2 test were used to evaluate the statistical significance.
RESULTS: A total of 253 procedures were performed on 187 patients, of whom 101/253 had dilated bile ducts and 152/253 not. In total, 243/253 procedures were successful. PTBD was significantly more often successful in patients with dilated vs. nondilated bile ducts (150/153 vs. 93/101; p 0.02). Overall complication rate (13%) did not differ significantly between patients with dilated vs. nondilated bile ducts. Procedures in patients with normal, nondilated bile ducts were associated with a significantly higher rate of post-interventional bleeding (5/101 vs. 0/152). Mean fluoroscopy time (42:36 ± 35:39 h vs. 30:28 ± 25:10 h; p 0.002) and amount of contrast media (66 ± 40 ml vs. 52 ± 24 ml; p 0.07) or use of disposables were significantly higher in patients with nondilated ducts. A significantly lower fluoroscopy time and amount of contrast medium were used in left hepatic PTBD.
CONCLUSION: Despite the higher technical complexity, PTBD with nondilated bile ducts was associated with similar overall complication rates but higher bleeding complications compared with PTBD with dilated bile ducts. KEY POINTS: • PTBD was associated with similar overall complication rates in patients with dilated vs. nondilated bile ducts. • Although overall complication rates were low, PTBD in patients with nondilated bile ducts was associated with a higher incidence of post-interventional bleeding. • PTBD in patients with nondilated bile ducts is technically more complex.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bile ducts; Biliary tract neoplasms; Cholangiography; Cholestasis; Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage

Year:  2020        PMID: 33051733     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-07368-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  3 in total

1.  Transcholecystic management of extrahepatic duct stones in poor candidates for endoscopic or transhepatic approaches.

Authors:  Suh Young Kim; Sangjoon Lee; Youngjong Cho; Sung-Joon Park; Hyoung Nam Lee
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2021-09-09       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Endoscopic ultrasound-guided biliary drainage and gastrointestinal anastomoses: the journey from promising innovations to standard of care.

Authors:  Giuseppe Vanella; Giuseppe Dell'Anna; Michiel Bronswijk; Roy L J van Wanrooij; Gianenrico Rizzatti; Paraskevas Gkolfakis; Alberto Larghi; Schalk van der Merwe; Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-07-15

3.  Bleeding after percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage due to arterial injury: A case study in patient with stable hemodynamic.

Authors:  Ira Widyaningtiyas; Hartono Yudi Sarastika; Harry Wahyudhy Utama
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2022-10-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.