| Literature DB >> 36262438 |
Jun Ye1, Xuemei Jia1, Junjie Zhang2, Kelei Guo3.
Abstract
The Physical Exercise Rating Scale, Mindfulness Attention Awareness Scale (MAAS), Ruminative Thinking Scale (RRS), and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) are used to conduct the questionnaire among a sample of 1,006 college students (average age = 19.95 years, SD = 1.86 years) to figure out whether there is any correlation between physical exercise and sleep quality in college students as well as how the mechanism of mindfulness and ruminative thinking plays a role in them. For data analysis, the Harman single-factor test was used; for the common method deviation test, Pearson's correlation analysis, and the mediating effect tested by using the bootstrap method were carried out.Entities:
Keywords: college students; mindfulness; physical exercise; ruminative thinking; sleep quality
Year: 2022 PMID: 36262438 PMCID: PMC9575948 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.987537
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Descriptive statistics of the main variables and their correlation analysis.
|
| SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
| 1. PE | 19.70 | 16.07 | 1 | |||
| 2. SQ | 6.30 | 3.71 | −0.06 | 1 | ||
| 3. MIN | 54.29 | 12.26 | 0.12 | −0.24 | 1 | |
| 4. RT | 44.50 | 10.87 | −0.10 | 0.28 | −0.37 | 1 |
N = 1,006. PE, physical exercise; SQ, sleep quality; MIN, mindfulness; RT, ruminative thinking.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.
Regression analysis of variable relationships.
| Regression equation | Overall fit index | Significance of coefficient of regression | 95% CI | |||||
|
|
|
|
| |||||
| Outcome variable | Predictive variable |
|
|
| β |
| Bootstrap lower limit | Bootstrap higher limit |
| SQ | Gender | 0.11 | 0.01 | 4.39 | −0.01 | −0.25 | −0.57 | 0.44 |
| Age | 0.09 | 2.95 | 0.06 | 0.31 | ||||
| PE | −0.08 | −2.35 | −0.02 | −0.002 | ||||
| MIN | Gender | 0.12 | 0.02 | 5.09 | −0.01 | −0.32 | −1.94 | 1.39 |
| Age | −0.02 | −0.55 | −0.53 | 0.30 | ||||
| PE | 0.12 | 3.45 | 0.03 | 0.10 | ||||
| RT | Gender | 0.38 | 0.14 | 42.07 | −0.04 | −1.28 | −2.28 | 0.48 |
| Age | −0.005 | −0.16 | −0.37 | 0.31 | ||||
| PE | −0.07 | −2.06 | −0.06 | −0.001 | ||||
| MIN | −0.37 | −12.51 | −0.38 | −0.28 | ||||
| SQ | Gender | 0.33 | 0.11 | 23.99 | −0.002 | −0.07 | −0.50 | 0.47 |
| Age | 0.09 | 3.00 | 0.06 | 0.30 | ||||
| PE | −0.04 | −1.17 | −0.02 | 0.004 | ||||
| MIN | −0.15 | −4.69 | −0.07 | −0.03 | ||||
| RT | 0.22 | 6.77 | 0.05 | 0.10 | ||||
Bootstrap sample size = 5,000. Bootstrap 95% CI does not contain 0 value, indicating a significant coefficient.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Test of intermediary effect.
| Path | Indirect effect value | BootSE | BootLLCI | BootULCI | Relative mediation effect (%) |
| Total indirect effect | −0.007 | 0.002 | −0.010 | −0.003 | 52.00 |
| PE → MIN → SQ | −0.003 | 0.001 | −0.005 | −0.001 | 22.40 |
| PE → RT → SQ | −0.002 | 0.001 | −0.005 | −0.0001 | 17.60 |
| PE → MIN → RT → SQ | −0.002 | 0.001 | −0.003 | −0.001 | 12.00 |
FIGURE 1Pathway map of PE affecting SQ. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.