Literature DB >> 36262334

Squalomix: shark and ray genome analysis consortium and its data sharing platform.

Osamu Nishimura1, John Rozewicki1, Kazuaki Yamaguchi1, Kaori Tatsumi1, Yuta Ohishi1, Tazro Ohta2, Masaru Yagura3, Taiki Niwa3,4, Chiharu Tanegashima1, Akinori Teramura5, Shotaro Hirase5, Akane Kawaguchi3, Milton Tan6, Salvatore D'Aniello7, Filipe Castro8,9, André Machado8, Mitsumasa Koyanagi10, Akihisa Terakita10, Ryo Misawa11, Masayuki Horie12, Junna Kawasaki13, Takashi Asahida14, Atsuko Yamaguchi15, Kiyomi Murakumo16, Rui Matsumoto16, Iker Irisarri17, Norio Miyamoto18, Atsushi Toyoda19, Sho Tanaka20, Tatsuya Sakamoto21, Yasuko Semba22, Shinya Yamauchi23, Kazuyuki Yamada24, Kiyonori Nishida25, Itsuki Kiyatake25, Keiichi Sato16, Susumu Hyodo26, Mitsutaka Kadota1, Yoshinobu Uno27, Shigehiro Kuraku1,3,4.   

Abstract

The taxon Elasmobranchii (sharks and rays) contains one of the long-established evolutionary lineages of vertebrates with a tantalizing collection of species occupying critical aquatic habitats. To overcome the current limitation in molecular resources, we launched the Squalomix Consortium in 2020 to promote a genome-wide array of molecular approaches, specifically targeting shark and ray species. Among the various bottlenecks in working with elasmobranchs are their elusiveness and low fecundity as well as the large and highly repetitive genomes. Their peculiar body fluid composition has also hindered the establishment of methods to perform routine cell culturing required for their karyotyping. In the Squalomix consortium, these obstacles are expected to be solved through a combination of in-house cytological techniques including karyotyping of cultured cells, chromatin preparation for Hi-C data acquisition, and high fidelity long-read sequencing. The resources and products obtained in this consortium, including genome and transcriptome sequences, a genome browser powered by JBrowse2 to visualize sequence alignments, and comprehensive matrices of gene expression profiles for selected species are accessible through https://github.com/Squalomix/info. Copyright:
© 2022 Nishimura O et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Shark; biodiversity genomics; chimaera; karyotype; ray; whole genome sequencing

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36262334      PMCID: PMC9561540          DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.123591.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  F1000Res        ISSN: 2046-1402


Introduction

Although usually recognized as a kind of ‘fish’ like actinopterygian fishes, cartilaginous fishes (chondrichthyans) form a distinct class of vertebrates with more than 1,200 species, known mostly as sharks and rays ( Figure 1; Nelson ). This taxonomic class has the longest evolutionary history among vertebrates of about 400 million years, in terms of the divergence of extant members ( Naylor ). Whereas its diversity might not be widely recognized, species in this taxon are characterized by several unique traits including electromagnetic sensing (all cartilaginous fishes), electricity generation (electric rays), diverse morphology sometimes with a flattened body (angelsharks and most rays) and/or a toothed rostrum (sawsharks and sawfishes). The highlight of their biological enigmas is in their reproductive modes with high plasticity between oviparity and viviparity, and occasionally parthenogenesis and intersexuality ( Penfold and Wyffels, 2019). Mainly because of overfishing, many cartilaginous fish populations are declining ( Pacoureau ), and evidence-based resource management would greatly benefit from the establishment of genomic platforms.
Figure 1.

Chondrichthyan phylogeny and taxon sampling in the Squalomix Consortium.

This figure includes some chondrichthyan species selected to represent the individual taxonomic orders that reflect the local fauna of Japan and are/will be analyzed by the consortium by genome or transcriptome sequencing (as of April 10, 2022). The full list of species and current status can be found in https://github.com/Squalomix/info.

Chondrichthyan phylogeny and taxon sampling in the Squalomix Consortium.

This figure includes some chondrichthyan species selected to represent the individual taxonomic orders that reflect the local fauna of Japan and are/will be analyzed by the consortium by genome or transcriptome sequencing (as of April 10, 2022). The full list of species and current status can be found in https://github.com/Squalomix/info. Despite these outstanding evolutionary and biological importance, modern genomic approaches have only recently been applied to cartilaginous fishes (reviewed in Kuraku, 2021). The only exception is the effort commenced before 2010 on the elephant fish Callorhinchus milii ( Venkatesh ), a member of the Holocephali (chimaeras and ratfishes), the more species-poor chondrichthyan lineage, with a relatively small genome size of about 1.9 giga basepairs (Gbp). In contrast, most elasmobranchs have genomes of more than 3 Gbp plagued with abundant repetitive elements.

Squalomix: consortium scope and organization

The Squalomix Consortium ( Figure 2A) was launched in 2020 aiming to provide the genome sequence and other genome-wide data for chondrichthyan species including transcriptomes and epigenomes. Sample processing and data production is conducted by the Molecular Life History Laboratory at the National Institute of Genetics, Mishima, Japan, and the Laboratory for Phyloinformatics in RIKEN Kobe, Japan, which harbors a DNA Analysis Facility. The consortium is funded by academic agencies as of May 2022 and is seeking additional funding sources, especially from industrial groups oriented toward the conservation of biodiversity and marine environments. In November 2020, the Squalomix Consortium became affiliated with Earth BioGenome Project (EBP), the global initiative to promote biodiversity genomics ( Lewin ). The collaborative network at the Squalomix Consortium includes an extensive range of expertise and worldwide distribution.
Figure 2.

Squalomix Consortium.

A, Consortium logo. B, One of the main study species, the red stingray Hemitrygon akajei. Photo credit: Itsuki Kiyatake.

Squalomix Consortium.

A, Consortium logo. B, One of the main study species, the red stingray Hemitrygon akajei. Photo credit: Itsuki Kiyatake.

Versatile sample collection featuring the local fauna

In Squalomix, sample collection is performed cautiously to minimize the sacrifice of wildlife—especially those with an endangered status. The collection focuses mainly on the rich marine fauna in Japan’s neighboring temperate waters, with occasional sources from death stranding for elusive species. The project collaborates closely with local aquariums oriented toward academic science. Their contributions play indispensable roles in relaying offshore sampling and enable sustainable sampling of embryos and blood from live individuals, although the latter approach is limited to species that can be bred in captivity and are amenable to husbandry. Another strength of the Squalomix Consortium is its expertise in laboratory solutions that are not confined to DNA sequencing, but additionally explore post-genome approaches to decipher the molecular basis of chondrichthyan phenotypic evolution. Access to fresh tissues from local aquaria facilitates embryological analysis, genome size quantification with flow cytometry, and karyotyping from cell cultures ( Figure 3). Remarkably, cell culture in cartilaginous fishes, which was long thought difficult because of their high body fluid osmolarity, was enabled by modifying the culture medium with balancing osmolytes ( Uno ). Our cytological expertise also allowed various epigenomic analyses that benefit from whole genome sequencing, on transcription factor binding with ChIP-seq ( Hara ) and chromatin openness with ATAC-seq, in addition to long-range DNA interactions with Hi-C ( Kadota ; Onimaru ). These techniques contributed to biological analyses based on the draft genome sequences of three shark species ( Hara ), which launched the Squalomix Consortium.
Figure 3.

Typical work flow in the Squalomix Consortium.

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is mainly performed with the Sequel II/IIe platform (Pacific Biosciences, Inc.) to obtain high-fidelity (HiFi) long reads, which is supplemented by short-read sequencing. Extraction of high molecular weight (HMW) genomic DNA is mainly performed using the NucleoBond columns (Macherey-Nagel, Inc.) and the extracted DNA is controlled with Agilent TapeStation systems (Agilent Technologies, Inc.) as well as conventional pulse-field gel electrophoresis. Flow cytometry for genome size estimation employs the Ploidy Analyser platform (Sysmex Inc.). Hi-C sample preparation employs the iconHi-C protocol ( Kadota ) that was optimized in-house based on several existing protocols.

Typical work flow in the Squalomix Consortium.

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) is mainly performed with the Sequel II/IIe platform (Pacific Biosciences, Inc.) to obtain high-fidelity (HiFi) long reads, which is supplemented by short-read sequencing. Extraction of high molecular weight (HMW) genomic DNA is mainly performed using the NucleoBond columns (Macherey-Nagel, Inc.) and the extracted DNA is controlled with Agilent TapeStation systems (Agilent Technologies, Inc.) as well as conventional pulse-field gel electrophoresis. Flow cytometry for genome size estimation employs the Ploidy Analyser platform (Sysmex Inc.). Hi-C sample preparation employs the iconHi-C protocol ( Kadota ) that was optimized in-house based on several existing protocols.

Sequencing strategy and recent progress

The sequencing strategy in the Squalomix Consortium is designed to accommodate genomic characteristics of cartilaginous fishes, mostly with large, repetitive genomes. In the standard protocol formulated in January 2021 ( Figure 3), we start by estimating genome size using flow cytometry and karyotyping as well as by ‘survey’ sequencing of transcriptomes, which serves for species identity verification with an assembled mitochondrial DNA sequence. These initial steps ensure sample authenticity and quality. We then proceed to genome sequencing, which employs both short-read and long-read high-fidelity (‘HiFi’) sequencing platforms, together with Hi-C data production for chromosome-scale scaffolding based on three-dimensional DNA interactions. The long-read data are obtained using the Sequel II or IIe platforms (Pacific Biosciences, Inc.) with a minimum sequencing depth of 20x. The assembly outputs are evaluated with reference to their coverage of protein-coding gene space, as well as transcriptome data, genome size, and karyotypic organization obtained separately. These validations allow us to scrutinize the inclusion of those genomic regions that are difficult to sequence and assemble, such as the Hox C genes that were previously thought to be missing in elasmobranchs but were retrieved by elaborate annotation ( Hara ; reviewed in Kuraku, 2021). Complete genome assemblies are critical to validate gene loss and variations in gene repertoires via synteny/phylogeny comparisons, previously suggested for visual opsins and conventional olfactory receptors ( Hara ). The standard procedure outlined above ( Figure 3) has been applied to several study species, including the red stingray Hemitrygon akajei ( Figure 2B) for which a draft genome assembly has been made available for BLAST searches at the Squalomix sequence archive ( Figure 4A; https://transcriptome.riken.jp/squalomix/).
Figure 4.

Overview of the Squalomix data sharing platform.

A, Sequence similarity search (BLAST) in elasmobranch genome and transcriptome sequences. B, Molecular phylogeny inference facilitated by the existing combination of aLeaves (that hosts products of Squalomix) and MAFFT webservers ( Kuraku ). C, Interactive genome browser employing JBrowse2 version 1.6.9 ( Buels ) for the zebra shark Stegostoma tigrinum (or S. fasciatum) based on its first genome assembly sSteFas1.1 (NCBI Genome ID, GCA_022316705.1). The websites providing these functions are found through the main consortium gateway ( https://github.com/Squalomix/info).

Overview of the Squalomix data sharing platform.

A, Sequence similarity search (BLAST) in elasmobranch genome and transcriptome sequences. B, Molecular phylogeny inference facilitated by the existing combination of aLeaves (that hosts products of Squalomix) and MAFFT webservers ( Kuraku ). C, Interactive genome browser employing JBrowse2 version 1.6.9 ( Buels ) for the zebra shark Stegostoma tigrinum (or S. fasciatum) based on its first genome assembly sSteFas1.1 (NCBI Genome ID, GCA_022316705.1). The websites providing these functions are found through the main consortium gateway ( https://github.com/Squalomix/info).

Cooperation toward the global goals

The Squalomix Consortium aims not only to sequence and analyze the genomes but also to tightly interact with other research groups whose target species list contains cartilaginous fishes including other EBP-affiliated projects (see below). To maximize mutual benefit among those projects, some animal samples from our collection could be provided for genome sequencing at other sites. The Squalomix Consortium offers laboratory experiments for genome size quantification or karyotype analysis for species listed by other consortia, provided that fresh cells are available. The sample transfer will be processed in accordance with the Nagoya Protocol and other relevant regulations. Inclusive cooperation respecting complementary expertise is expected to overcome the long-standing difficulty in studying elasmobranchs sustainably and contribute to disentangling the marine ecosystems for effective conservation.

Data sharing platforms

Once produced, genome assemblies pass rigid quality controls and are deposited in the NCBI Genome under the NCBI BioProject ID PRJNA707598 and made available as database for BLAST searches at our Squalomix sequence archive ( https://transcriptome.riken.jp/squalomix/). This archive also has a link to the up-to-date listing of the species for which genome sequences are available, filed by the GenomeSync database ( http://genomesync.org/). The archive website also hosts a gateway to genome browsers powered by JBrowse2 that allow users to visualize specific genomic regions and load additional tracks including base composition, gene models, repetitive elements, and aligned RNA-seq reads ( Figure 4C). We also provide comprehensive matrices of expression profiles for predicted genes of the brownbanded bamboo shark Chiloscyllium punctatum and the cloudy catshark Scyliorhinus torazame that were already quantified and normalized based on RNA-seq data of various tissues for our past publication ( Hara ).

Other pioneering efforts tackling elasmobranch genomes

Some elasmobranch genomes have already been sequenced by other pioneering working groups ( https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/data-hub/genome/?taxon=7777&reference_only=true). This includes the Vertebrate Genomes Project (VGP), whose data production format employs a suite of modern promising solutions including optical mapping and Hi-C scaffolding as well as long-read and short-read sequencing, to cover all vertebrate species ( Rhie ). The initial VGP progress report released the genome sequences of the thorny skate Amblyraja radiata (NCBI Genome ID, GCA_010909765.2). The Darwin Tree of Life (DToL) Project partly links with VGP and aims to sequence all eukaryotic species in Britain and Ireland. DToL’s first chondrichthyan genome is that of the small-spotted catshark Scyliorhinus canicula, the egg-laying species most widely studied in developmental biology and endocrinology (NCBI Genome ID, GCA_902713615.1). The recently launched European Reference Genome Atlas (ERGA) also plans to produce reference chromosome anchored genomes of multiple species from this geography including cartilaginous fish aiming to empower conservation efforts ( Formenti ). Researchers in China launched the Fish10K project that partially targets cartilaginous fishes ( Fan, ). In addition, the DNA Zoo project puts special emphasis on Hi-C scaffolding ( Rao ), often using available genome assemblies already released by other groups as input and performing chromosome-scale genome scaffolding using Hi-C data even in the presence of intra-specific genomic variations. So far, the DNA Zoo effort produced the chromosome-scale genome assemblies of the brownbanded bamboo shark C. punctatum and the whale shark Rhincodon typus, each of which was produced using samples from multiple individuals ( Hoencamp ). All the above efforts are expected to be coordinated under the overarching EBP initiative, in order to play complementary roles towards the global aim of generating high-quality genomic resources.

Data availability

Products from this consortium are deposited in NCBI under the BioProject ID PRJNA707598 and are available at our Squalomix sequence archive ( https://transcriptome.riken.jp/squalomix/). I greet this initiative with great enthusiasm. The description is well written, clear and easy to follow. I have just a few comments that I hope the authors will consider. In the introduction, the authors describe Chondrichthyes as the oldest vertebrate class ("longest evolutionary history"). However, this is due to the imprecise use of the term "class" in vertebrate taxonomy where both Chondrichthyes and Mammalia are designated as classes. Thus, classes are not of equal temporal rank. Furthermore, the authors' statement is not quite true, because even Agnatha has the taxonomic rank as a vertebrate class and would thereby be even earlier than Chondrichthyes. I would recommend the authors to describe Chondrichthyes instead as one of the two lineages resulting from the first bifurcation or divergence in (the infraphylum of) Gnathostomata (jawed vertebrates). This, by the way, means that Osteichthyes is as old as Chondrichthyes! Please correct the grammar of the expression "Despite these outstanding evolutionary and biological importance…". It probably needs to be rephrased, perhaps like this: "Despite the outstanding evolutionary and biological importance of chondrichthyans…" (or elasmobranchs if you prefer to focus on these). Shouldn't "giga basepairs" be one word as one would surely write megabasepairs and kilobasepairs. Figure 1: The expression "Other osteichthyans" is imprecies. I assume the authors want to avoid the term "Sarcopterygians" for this group pterygi means fins, and tetrapods of course don't have them. Maybe it's better to just delete "Other osteichthyans" and let this branch be called "Tetrapods, lungfishes and coelacanths) (without capital initial letters). Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others? Yes Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described? Yes Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? Yes Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Reviewer Expertise: Gene family evolution, pharmacology of G protein-coupled receptors, mechanism of long-term memory We confirm that we have read this submission and believe that we have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard. In this Data note, the authors describe and wrap-up all available material generated through their consortium named Squalomix, in which a set of biological material and sequence data obtained in elasmobranch organisms are made available to the research community. The rationale, protocol, material and data availability are clearly described in this Note. Are sufficient details of methods and materials provided to allow replication by others? Yes Is the rationale for creating the dataset(s) clearly described? Yes Are the datasets clearly presented in a useable and accessible format? Yes Are the protocols appropriate and is the work technically sound? Yes Reviewer Expertise: Developmental genetics, EvoDevo I confirm that I have read this submission and believe that I have an appropriate level of expertise to confirm that it is of an acceptable scientific standard.
  17 in total

1.  Shark and ray genomics for disentangling their morphological diversity and vertebrate evolution.

Authors:  Shigehiro Kuraku
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2021-06-06       Impact factor: 3.582

2.  Shark genomes provide insights into elasmobranch evolution and the origin of vertebrates.

Authors:  Yuichiro Hara; Kazuaki Yamaguchi; Koh Onimaru; Mitsutaka Kadota; Mitsumasa Koyanagi; Sean D Keeley; Kaori Tatsumi; Kaori Tanaka; Fumio Motone; Yuka Kageyama; Ryo Nozu; Noritaka Adachi; Osamu Nishimura; Reiko Nakagawa; Chiharu Tanegashima; Itsuki Kiyatake; Rui Matsumoto; Kiyomi Murakumo; Kiyonori Nishida; Akihisa Terakita; Shigeru Kuratani; Keiichi Sato; Susumu Hyodo; Shigehiro Kuraku
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-10-08       Impact factor: 15.460

Review 3.  Reproductive Science in Sharks and Rays.

Authors:  Linda M Penfold; Jennifer T Wyffels
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2019       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  The era of reference genomes in conservation genomics.

Authors:  Giulio Formenti; Kathrin Theissinger; Carlos Fernandes; Iliana Bista; Aureliano Bombarely; Christoph Bleidorn; Claudio Ciofi; Angelica Crottini; José A Godoy; Jacob Höglund; Joanna Malukiewicz; Alice Mouton; Rebekah A Oomen; Sadye Paez; Per J Palsbøll; Christophe Pampoulie; María J Ruiz-López; Hannes Svardal; Constantina Theofanopoulou; Jan de Vries; Ann-Marie Waldvogel; Guojie Zhang; Camila J Mazzoni; Erich D Jarvis; Miklós Bálint
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 17.712

5.  Half a century of global decline in oceanic sharks and rays.

Authors:  Nathan Pacoureau; Cassandra L Rigby; Peter M Kyne; Richard B Sherley; Henning Winker; John K Carlson; Sonja V Fordham; Rodrigo Barreto; Daniel Fernando; Malcolm P Francis; Rima W Jabado; Katelyn B Herman; Kwang-Ming Liu; Andrea D Marshall; Riley A Pollom; Evgeny V Romanov; Colin A Simpfendorfer; Jamie S Yin; Holly K Kindsvater; Nicholas K Dulvy
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Towards complete and error-free genome assemblies of all vertebrate species.

Authors:  Arang Rhie; Shane A McCarthy; Olivier Fedrigo; Joana Damas; Giulio Formenti; Sergey Koren; Marcela Uliano-Silva; William Chow; Arkarachai Fungtammasan; Juwan Kim; Chul Lee; Byung June Ko; Mark Chaisson; Gregory L Gedman; Lindsey J Cantin; Francoise Thibaud-Nissen; Leanne Haggerty; Iliana Bista; Michelle Smith; Bettina Haase; Jacquelyn Mountcastle; Sylke Winkler; Sadye Paez; Jason Howard; Sonja C Vernes; Tanya M Lama; Frank Grutzner; Wesley C Warren; Christopher N Balakrishnan; Dave Burt; Julia M George; Matthew T Biegler; David Iorns; Andrew Digby; Daryl Eason; Bruce Robertson; Taylor Edwards; Mark Wilkinson; George Turner; Axel Meyer; Andreas F Kautt; Paolo Franchini; H William Detrich; Hannes Svardal; Maximilian Wagner; Gavin J P Naylor; Martin Pippel; Milan Malinsky; Mark Mooney; Maria Simbirsky; Brett T Hannigan; Trevor Pesout; Marlys Houck; Ann Misuraca; Sarah B Kingan; Richard Hall; Zev Kronenberg; Ivan Sović; Christopher Dunn; Zemin Ning; Alex Hastie; Joyce Lee; Siddarth Selvaraj; Richard E Green; Nicholas H Putnam; Ivo Gut; Jay Ghurye; Erik Garrison; Ying Sims; Joanna Collins; Sarah Pelan; James Torrance; Alan Tracey; Jonathan Wood; Robel E Dagnew; Dengfeng Guan; Sarah E London; David F Clayton; Claudio V Mello; Samantha R Friedrich; Peter V Lovell; Ekaterina Osipova; Farooq O Al-Ajli; Simona Secomandi; Heebal Kim; Constantina Theofanopoulou; Michael Hiller; Yang Zhou; Robert S Harris; Kateryna D Makova; Paul Medvedev; Jinna Hoffman; Patrick Masterson; Karen Clark; Fergal Martin; Kevin Howe; Paul Flicek; Brian P Walenz; Woori Kwak; Hiram Clawson; Mark Diekhans; Luis Nassar; Benedict Paten; Robert H S Kraus; Andrew J Crawford; M Thomas P Gilbert; Guojie Zhang; Byrappa Venkatesh; Robert W Murphy; Klaus-Peter Koepfli; Beth Shapiro; Warren E Johnson; Federica Di Palma; Tomas Marques-Bonet; Emma C Teeling; Tandy Warnow; Jennifer Marshall Graves; Oliver A Ryder; David Haussler; Stephen J O'Brien; Jonas Korlach; Harris A Lewin; Kerstin Howe; Eugene W Myers; Richard Durbin; Adam M Phillippy; Erich D Jarvis
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  aLeaves facilitates on-demand exploration of metazoan gene family trees on MAFFT sequence alignment server with enhanced interactivity.

Authors:  Shigehiro Kuraku; Christian M Zmasek; Osamu Nishimura; Kazutaka Katoh
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Cell culture-based karyotyping of orectolobiform sharks for chromosome-scale genome analysis.

Authors:  Yoshinobu Uno; Ryo Nozu; Itsuki Kiyatake; Nobuyuki Higashiguchi; Shuji Sodeyama; Kiyomi Murakumo; Keiichi Sato; Shigehiro Kuraku
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2020-11-06

9.  Initial data release and announcement of the 10,000 Fish Genomes Project (Fish10K).

Authors:  Guangyi Fan; Yue Song; Liandong Yang; Xiaoyun Huang; Suyu Zhang; Mengqi Zhang; Xianwei Yang; Yue Chang; He Zhang; Yongxin Li; Shanshan Liu; Lili Yu; Jeffery Chu; Inge Seim; Chenguang Feng; Thomas J Near; Rod A Wing; Wen Wang; Kun Wang; Jing Wang; Xun Xu; Huanming Yang; Xin Liu; Nansheng Chen; Shunping He
Journal:  Gigascience       Date:  2020-08-01       Impact factor: 6.524

10.  The Earth BioGenome Project 2020: Starting the clock.

Authors:  Harris A Lewin; Stephen Richards; Erez Lieberman Aiden; Miguel L Allende; John M Archibald; Miklós Bálint; Katharine B Barker; Bridget Baumgartner; Katherine Belov; Giorgio Bertorelle; Mark L Blaxter; Jing Cai; Nicolette D Caperello; Keith Carlson; Juan Carlos Castilla-Rubio; Shu-Miaw Chaw; Lei Chen; Anna K Childers; Jonathan A Coddington; Dalia A Conde; Montserrat Corominas; Keith A Crandall; Andrew J Crawford; Federica DiPalma; Richard Durbin; ThankGod E Ebenezer; Scott V Edwards; Olivier Fedrigo; Paul Flicek; Giulio Formenti; Richard A Gibbs; M Thomas P Gilbert; Melissa M Goldstein; Jennifer Marshall Graves; Henry T Greely; Igor V Grigoriev; Kevin J Hackett; Neil Hall; David Haussler; Kristofer M Helgen; Carolyn J Hogg; Sachiko Isobe; Kjetill Sigurd Jakobsen; Axel Janke; Erich D Jarvis; Warren E Johnson; Steven J M Jones; Elinor K Karlsson; Paul J Kersey; Jin-Hyoung Kim; W John Kress; Shigehiro Kuraku; Mara K N Lawniczak; James H Leebens-Mack; Xueyan Li; Kerstin Lindblad-Toh; Xin Liu; Jose V Lopez; Tomas Marques-Bonet; Sophie Mazard; Jonna A K Mazet; Camila J Mazzoni; Eugene W Myers; Rachel J O'Neill; Sadye Paez; Hyun Park; Gene E Robinson; Cristina Roquet; Oliver A Ryder; Jamal S M Sabir; H Bradley Shaffer; Timothy M Shank; Jacob S Sherkow; Pamela S Soltis; Boping Tang; Leho Tedersoo; Marcela Uliano-Silva; Kun Wang; Xiaofeng Wei; Regina Wetzer; Julia L Wilson; Xun Xu; Huanming Yang; Anne D Yoder; Guojie Zhang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 12.779

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.