Literature DB >> 36261643

Survival prediction for patients with malignant biliary obstruction caused by pancreatic cancer undergoing biliary drainage: the COMBO-PaS model.

Hai-Feng Zhou1, Jia-Lei Wang1, Wei Yang1, Chun Zhou1, Yan Shen1, Ling-Ling Wu1, Zhong-Ling Pei1, Wei-Zhong Zhou2, Sheng Liu3, Hai-Bin Shi4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with pancreatic cancer-caused biliary obstruction (PC-BO) have poor prognosis, but we lack of tools to predict survival for clinical decision-making. This study aims to establish a model for survival prediction among patients with PC-BO.
METHODS: A total of 172 patients with PC-BO treated with percutaneous biliary drainage were randomly divided into a training group (n = 120) and a validation group (n = 52). The independent risk factors for overall survival were selected to develop a Cox model. The predictive performance of M stage, hepatic metastases, cancer antigen 199, and the Cox model was determined. Naples prognostic score (NPS), the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) for 1-month mortality risk were compared with the Cox model.
RESULTS: The Cox model was developed based on total cholesterol, direct bilirubin, hepatic metastases, cancer antigen 199, stenosis type, and preprocedural infection (all P < 0.05), which named "COMBO-PaS." The COMBO-PaS model had the highest area under the curves (AUC) (0.801-0.933) comparing with other predictors (0.506-0.740) for 1-, 3-, and 6-month survival prediction. For 1-month mortality risk prediction, the COMBO-PaS model had the highest AUC of 0.829 comparing with NPS, PNI, and CONUT.
CONCLUSION: The COMBO-PaS model was useful for survival prediction among patients with PC-BO.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biliary obstruction; Pancreatic cancer; Percutaneous biliary drainage; Prognostic prediction; Survival

Year:  2022        PMID: 36261643     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09698-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  25 in total

Review 1.  Pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan D Mizrahi; Rishi Surana; Juan W Valle; Rachna T Shroff
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Management of Biliary Strictures: State-of-the-Art Review.

Authors:  Baljendra S Kapoor; Giovanni Mauri; Jonathan M Lorenz
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Percutaneous management of malignant biliary disease.

Authors:  Ahsun Riaz; John P Pinkard; Riad Salem; Robert J Lewandowski
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-04-12       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Biliary cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up.

Authors:  J W Valle; I Borbath; S A Khan; F Huguet; T Gruenberger; D Arnold
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Clinical Implications of Naples Prognostic Score in Patients with Resected Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Nobuhiko Nakagawa; Suguru Yamada; Fuminori Sonohara; Hideki Takami; Masamichi Hayashi; Mitsuro Kanda; Daisuke Kobayashi; Chie Tanaka; Goro Nakayama; Masahiko Koike; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  The Significant Value of Preoperative Prognostic Nutritional Index for Survival in Pancreatic Cancers: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiandong Liu; Shanshan Jiang; Xinghua Yang; Xiaoqiang Li; Ning Wang
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.327

7.  Impact of the Controlling Nutritional Status Score on the Prognosis After Curative Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yoshiyasu Kato; Suguru Yamada; Masaya Suenaga; Hideki Takami; Yukiko Niwa; Masamichi Hayashi; Naoki Iwata; Mitsuro Kanda; Chie Tanaka; Goro Nakayama; Masahiko Koike; Michitaka Fujiwara; Yasuhiro Kodera
Journal:  Pancreas       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.327

8.  Endoscopic biliary stenting: indications, choice of stents, and results: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline - Updated October 2017.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Dumonceau; Andrea Tringali; Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Daniel Blero; Benedetto Mangiavillano; Arthur Schmidt; Geoffroy Vanbiervliet; Guido Costamagna; Jacques Devière; Jesús García-Cano; Tibor Gyökeres; Cesare Hassan; Frédéric Prat; Peter D Siersema; Jeanin E van Hooft
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 10.093

9.  Prognostic Role of the Prognostic Nutritional Index in Pancreatic Cancer: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sihan Li; Guangwei Tian; Zhiqin Chen; Yuan Zhuang; Guang Li
Journal:  Nutr Cancer       Date:  2019-01-20       Impact factor: 2.900

Review 10.  Therapeutic developments in pancreatic cancer: current and future perspectives.

Authors:  John P Neoptolemos; Jörg Kleeff; Patrick Michl; Eithne Costello; William Greenhalf; Daniel H Palmer
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 46.802

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.