OBJECTIVES: The controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score is a useful tool to evaluate immune-nutritional status. This study aimed to investigate the impact of the CONUT score on short- and long-term outcomes after curative resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: Consecutive 344 PDAC patients receiving pancreatectomy without neoadjuvant therapy were examined retrospectively. After the best predictive value of the CONUT score for survival was identified, association between the CONUT score and long-term outcomes was evaluated using log-rank tests and a Cox regression model. Then correlations between the CONUT score and postoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: The optimal cutoff value of the CONUT score was 4. The high CONUT score group showed significantly lower overall survival than the low CONUT score group (P = 0.002). In contrast, no significant difference in recurrence-free survival was found (P = 0.43). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that high CONUT score had an independent association with overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.64; P = 0.003). The CONUT score showed no association with postoperative pancreatic fistula, Clavien-Dindo grade, or postoperative hospital stay. CONCLUSION: The CONUT score had an independent association with survival in patients with PDAC after pancreatectomy and was not associated with recurrence or postoperative complications.
OBJECTIVES: The controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score is a useful tool to evaluate immune-nutritional status. This study aimed to investigate the impact of the CONUT score on short- and long-term outcomes after curative resection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: Consecutive 344 PDAC patients receiving pancreatectomy without neoadjuvant therapy were examined retrospectively. After the best predictive value of the CONUT score for survival was identified, association between the CONUT score and long-term outcomes was evaluated using log-rank tests and a Cox regression model. Then correlations between the CONUT score and postoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: The optimal cutoff value of the CONUT score was 4. The high CONUT score group showed significantly lower overall survival than the low CONUT score group (P = 0.002). In contrast, no significant difference in recurrence-free survival was found (P = 0.43). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that high CONUT score had an independent association with overall survival (hazard ratio, 1.64; P = 0.003). The CONUT score showed no association with postoperative pancreatic fistula, Clavien-Dindo grade, or postoperative hospital stay. CONCLUSION: The CONUT score had an independent association with survival in patients with PDAC after pancreatectomy and was not associated with recurrence or postoperative complications.