Literature DB >> 36261536

Surgical tips in difficult penile prosthetic surgery: a narrative review.

Nicolò Schifano1,2, Paolo Capogrosso3, Onur Omer Cakir4, Federico Dehò3, Giulio Garaffa5.   

Abstract

Penile prosthesis implantation continues to represent a reliable solution to address erectile dysfunction when oral medications fail, are not tolerated or are contraindicated, and most typically is associated with excellent satisfaction rates and durable results. Despite the dramatic improvements in the prostheses' design, in the surgical instruments and techniques over the years, certain categories of patients still pose a significant surgical challenge. The aim of the current review is to provide a quick and useful practical guidance based on our expertise in the identification and management of the difficult penile prosthesis implantation cases. A narrative review design was here preferred to fulfil our purpose. The search strategy included a range of terms, e.g. penile prosthesis, corporal fibrosis, infection, ischaemic priapism, Peyronie's disease, radical prostatectomy, pelvic surgery. Extensive corporal fibrosis after explantation of an infected device or after prolonged ischaemic priapism may represent the most difficult situations to deal with in penile prosthesis implantation surgery. Penile prosthesis implantation in patients with Peyronie's disease and in those who previously underwent radical prostatectomy also presents with an increased risk of complications. Experienced surgeons need to be able to recognise promptly and manage urethral perforation, cylinder crossover, tunical perforation and erosion, as these complications are more common when dealing with difficult penile prosthesis implantation cases. Applying penile lengthening techniques and principles can be useful in selected cases to ensure better postoperative satisfaction rates, especially in those patients who have experienced a more significant degree of loss of length preoperatively. High-volume-implanting surgeons should always be involved in complex cases to minimise the risk of complications. A thorough preoperative counselling can set realistic patients' expectations in this context, further contributing to postoperative satisfaction.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 36261536     DOI: 10.1038/s41443-022-00629-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Impot Res        ISSN: 0955-9930            Impact factor:   2.408


  56 in total

1.  Infection risk of undergoing multiple penile prostheses: an analysis of referred patient surgical histories.

Authors:  Brian D Montgomery; Derek J Lomas; Matthew J Ziegelmann; Landon W Trost
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 2.896

2.  An outcomes analysis of penile prosthesis implantation following radical cystoprostatectomy and urinary diversion: a multicentric retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Marco Falcone; Luigi Pucci; Giulio Garaffa; Andrea Cocci; Arianna Gillo; Marco Capece; Carlo Ceruti; Massimiliano Timpano; Omid Sedigh; Mirko Preto; Gideon Blecher; Francesco Chiancone; Maurizio Carrino; Luigi Rolle; Paolo Gontero
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.896

3.  Strategies and current practices for penile lengthening in severe Peyronie's disease cases: a systematic review.

Authors:  Marco Falcone; Mirko Preto; Andrea Cocci; Giulio Garaffa
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 2.896

4.  Impact of Pelvic Radiation Therapy on Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Reoperation Rates.

Authors:  Ron Golan; Neal A Patel; Tianyi Sun; Christopher E Barbieri; Art Sedrakyan; James A Kashanian
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 3.802

5.  Cylinder insertion into scarred corporal bodies: prosthetic urology's most difficult challenge: some suggestions for making the surgery easier.

Authors:  Steven K Wilson; Jay Simhan; Martin S Gross
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 2.896

Review 6.  Penile Prosthesis Implantation in Acute and Chronic Priapism.

Authors:  Giulio Garaffa; David J Ralph
Journal:  Sex Med Rev       Date:  2015-10-18

7.  Simultaneous total corporal reconstruction and implantation of a penile prosthesis in patients with erectile dysfunction and severe fibrosis of the corpora cavernosa.

Authors:  Salvatore Sansalone; Giulio Garaffa; Rados Djinovic; Gabriele Antonini; Giuseppe Vespasiani; Francesco Pio Ieria; Sebastiano Cimino; Carla Loreto; David J Ralph
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 3.802

8.  Long-Term Follow-Up After Penile Prosthesis Implantation-Survival and Quality of Life Outcomes.

Authors:  Francesco Chierigo; Paolo Capogrosso; Federico Dehò; Edoardo Pozzi; Nicolò Schifano; Federico Belladelli; Francesco Montorsi; Andrea Salonia
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 9.  Penile Prosthesis Surgery: Current Recommendations From the International Consultation on Sexual Medicine.

Authors:  Laurence A Levine; Edgardo F Becher; Anthony J Bella; William O Brant; Tobias S Kohler; Juan Ignacio Martinez-Salamanca; Landon Trost; Allen F Morey
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 3.802

10.  Unwinding Fibrosis in Peyronie's Disease.

Authors:  Jacob R Basilius; James M Hotaling; Alexander W Pastuszak
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2020-02-25       Impact factor: 3.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.