Literature DB >> 31501062

Long-Term Follow-Up After Penile Prosthesis Implantation-Survival and Quality of Life Outcomes.

Francesco Chierigo1, Paolo Capogrosso1, Federico Dehò1, Edoardo Pozzi2, Nicolò Schifano1, Federico Belladelli2, Francesco Montorsi2, Andrea Salonia3.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Hydraulic penile prostheses have shown an overall good mechanical reliability up to 10 years after surgery; however, few data have been published on very long-term follow-up. AIM: We looked at long-term (≥15 years) complications, including functional and quality of life (QoL) outcomes, after 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation in patients with erectile dysfunction (ED).
METHODS: Data regarding 149 patients submitting to IPP placement before 2001 were analyzed. All patients were implanted with AMS CX and Ultrex Plus 3-piece prostheses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Patients were reassessed to evaluate rates of complications and functional outcomes. The validated questionnaire Quality of Life and Sexuality with Penile Prosthesis (QoLSPP) was used to assess patient QoL. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated the probability of prosthesis survival (defined as working device/not-explanted).
RESULTS: Median follow-up of 51 patients was 206 months (interquartile range [IQR], 145-257). The etiology of ED was vasculogenic (n = 20; 39%), Peyronie's disease (n = 15; 29%), pelvic surgery (n = 4; 7.8%), organic other than vasculogenic (n = 3; 5.9%), or other (n = 9; 18%). Throughout the follow-up, 24 patients (49%) experienced complications: mechanical failure (n = 19; 79%), pain (n = 3; 12%), orgasmic dysfunctions (n = 1; 4.5%), or device infection (n = 1; 4.5%). The estimated IPP survival was 53% (95% CI, 36-67) at 20-year follow-up. Baseline characteristics (age, Charlson comorbidity index, body mass index, and erectile dysfunction etiology) were not significantly associated with the risk of IPP failure over time by Cox regression analysis. At 20-year follow-up, 41% (95% CI, 19-49) of the patients were still using the device. Among them, QoLSPP median domain scores were high: functional 22/25 (IQR, 20-23), relational 17/20 (IQR, 15-18), personal 14/15 (IQR, 12-15), and social 14/15 (IQR, 11-15). CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The longevity of the device and long-term satisfaction rates should be comprehensively discussed during patient consultation for IPP surgery. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting long-term QoL outcomes using a dedicated questionnaire for penile prostheses. The low response rate for the telephone interviews, the retrospective design of the study, and the relatively small number of patients are the main limitations.
CONCLUSION: Long-term follow-up data after IPP placement showed that almost half of the devices still worked properly 20 years after the original penile implant, as 60% of patients were still using the device with high satisfaction and adequate QoL outcomes. Both patients and physicians should be aware of the expected life and outcomes of IPP implants. Chierigo F, Capogrosso P, Dehò, et al. Long-Term Follow-Up After Penile Prosthesis Implantation-Survival and Quality of Life Outcomes. J Sex Med 2019;16:1827-1833.
Copyright © 2019 International Society for Sexual Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Erectile Dysfunction; Long-Term Follow-Up; Penile Prosthesis; QoLSPP; Satisfaction

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31501062     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  9 in total

1.  Canadian Urological Association guideline: Erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Trustin Domes; Borna Tadayon Najafabadi; Matthew Roberts; Jeffrey Campbell; Ryan Flannigan; Phil Bach; Premal Patel; Gavin Langille; Yonah Krakowsky; Philippe D Violette
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  Reconstructive surgery of the scrotum: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicolò Schifano; Fabio Castiglione; Onur Omer Cakir; Francesco Montorsi; Giulio Garaffa
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 2.896

3.  Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in patients with preexisting inflatable penile prostheses.

Authors:  Shohaib Virani; Colin Kleinguetl; Erin T Bird; Marawan M El Tayeb
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2022-04-27

4.  Satisfaction rates of inflatable penile prosthesis in men who have sex with men are high.

Authors:  Justin La; Charles A Loeb; David W Barham; Jake Miller; Eric Chung; Martin S Gross; Georgios Hatzichristodoulou; Sung Hun Park; Paul E Perito; Alfredo Suarez-Sarmiento; Koenraad Van Renterghem; Faysal A Yafi
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-08-08       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 5.  Surgical tips in difficult penile prosthetic surgery: a narrative review.

Authors:  Nicolò Schifano; Paolo Capogrosso; Onur Omer Cakir; Federico Dehò; Giulio Garaffa
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 6.  Use of grafting materials during penile prosthesis implantation in patients with Peyronie's disease-a systematic review.

Authors:  Francesco Chierigo; Carlo Bettocchi; Felix Campos-Juanatey; Fabio Castiglione; Luis A Kluth; Carlo Terrone; Asif Muneer
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 2.408

7.  Three-Piece Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation for the Treatment of Severe Erectile Dysfunction Following a Complex Pelvic Fracture: A Case Report.

Authors:  Minh H Truong; Trung Q Ngo
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-10-10

Review 8.  Enhanced recovery strategies after penile implantation: a narrative review.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Ellis; Architha Sudhakar; Jay Simhan
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-06

9.  Ten-year experience with penile prosthetic surgery for the treatment of erectile dysfunction: outcomes of a tertiary referral center and predictors of early prosthetic infection.

Authors:  Franco Palmisano; Luca Boeri; Riccardo Ievoli; Josvany Sánchez-Curbelo; Matteo Giulio Spinelli; Andrea Gregori; Antonio Maria Granata; Eduard Ruiz-Castañé; Emanuele Montanari; Joaquim Sarquella-Geli
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.