Literature DB >> 36261227

Replication-associated inversions are the dominant form of bacterial chromosome structural variation.

Matthew D'Iorio1, Ken Dewar2,3.   

Abstract

The structural arrangements of bacterial chromosomes vary widely between closely related species and can result in significant phenotypic outcomes. The appearance of large-scale chromosomal inversions that are symmetric relative to markers for the origin of replication (OriC) has been previously observed; however, the overall prevalence of replication-associated structural rearrangements (RASRs) in bacteria and their causal mechanisms are currently unknown. Here, we systematically identify the locations of RASRs in species with multiple complete-sequenced genomes and investigate potential mediating biological mechanisms. We found that 247 of 313 species contained sequences with at least one large (>50 Kb) inversion in their sequence comparisons, and the aggregated inversion distances away from symmetry were normally distributed with a mean of zero. Many inversions that were offset from dnaA were found to be centered on a different marker for the OriC Instances of flanking repeats provide evidence that breaks formed during the replication process could be repaired to opposing positions. We also found a strong relationship between the later stages of replication and the range in distance variation from symmetry.
© 2022 D’Iorio and Dewar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36261227      PMCID: PMC9584773          DOI: 10.26508/lsa.202201434

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Life Sci Alliance        ISSN: 2575-1077


  36 in total

1.  The importance of repairing stalled replication forks.

Authors:  M M Cox; M F Goodman; K N Kreuzer; D J Sherratt; S J Sandler; K J Marians
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-03-02       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Bacterial genomic reorganization upon DNA replication.

Authors:  S Makino ; M Suzuki
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-05-04       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Multiple pathways process stalled replication forks.

Authors:  Bénédicte Michel; Gianfranco Grompone; Maria-Jose Florès; Vladimir Bidnenko
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Proposal of the suffix -ota to denote phyla. Addendum to 'Proposal to include the rank of phylum in the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes'.

Authors:  William B Whitman; Aharon Oren; Maria Chuvochina; Milton S da Costa; George M Garrity; Fred A Rainey; Ramon Rossello-Mora; Bernhard Schink; Iain Sutcliffe; Martha E Trujillo; Stefano Ventura
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 2.747

5.  Independence of replisomes in Escherichia coli chromosomal replication.

Authors:  Adam M Breier; Heinz-Ulrich G Weier; Nicholas R Cozzarelli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  F-prime factors of Salmonella typhimurium and an inversion between S. typhimurium and Escherichia coli.

Authors:  K E Sanderson; C A Hall
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1970-02       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Valid publication of the names of forty-two phyla of prokaryotes.

Authors:  Aharon Oren; George M Garrity
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  Gene inversion potentiates bacterial evolvability and virulence.

Authors:  Christopher N Merrikh; Houra Merrikh
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 9.  Opportunities and challenges in long-read sequencing data analysis.

Authors:  Shanika L Amarasinghe; Shian Su; Xueyi Dong; Luke Zappia; Matthew E Ritchie; Quentin Gouil
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2020-02-07       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Dynamics of genome rearrangement in bacterial populations.

Authors:  Aaron E Darling; István Miklós; Mark A Ragan
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 5.917

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.