Literature DB >> 36260642

Identifying the impact of social influences in health-related discrete choice experiments.

Esther W de Bekker-Grob1,2, Kirsten Howard3, Joffre Swait1,2.   

Abstract

Several disciplines, among them health, sociology, and economics, provide strong evidence that social context is important to individual choices. It is therefore surprising that relatively little research has been focused on integrating the effect of social influence into choice models, especially given the importance of such choices in healthcare. This study developed and empirically tested a choice model that accounts for social network influences in a discrete choice experiment (DCE). We focused on maternal choices for childhood vaccination in Australia, and used an econometric choice model that explicitly 1) incorporated vaccine schedule characteristics, benefits and costs, and 2) represented up to ten different identifiable key influencer types (e.g., partner, parents, friends, healthcare professionals, inter alia), allowing for the attribution of directional importance of each influencer on the gravid woman's decision to adhere to or reject childhood vaccination. Pregnant women (N = 604) aged 18 years and older recruited from an online panel completed a survey, including a DCE and questions about key influencers. A two-class ordered latent class model was conducted to analyse the DCE data, which assumes that the underlying latent driver (in our case the WHO vaccine hesitancy scale) is ordered, to give a practical interpretation of the meaning of the classes. When the choice model considered both childhood vaccination attributes and key influencers, a very high model fit was reached. The impact of key influencers on maternal choice for childhood vaccination was massive compared to the impact of childhood vaccination attributes. The marginal impact differed between key influencers. Our DCE study showed that the maternal decision for childhood vaccination was essentially almost completely socially driven, suggesting that the potential impact of social network influences can and should be considered in health-related DCEs, particular those where there are likely to be strong underlying social norms dictating decision maker behaviour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36260642      PMCID: PMC9581381          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


  38 in total

1.  Predicting uptake of MMR vaccination: a prospective questionnaire study.

Authors:  Mary Flynn; Jane Ogden
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections.

Authors:  Mandy Ryan; Karen Gerard
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.561

3.  Parent preferences for pediatric influenza vaccine attributes.

Authors:  Emuella M Flood; Kellie J Ryan; Matthew D Rousculp; Kathleen M Beusterien; Victoria M Divino; Stan L Block; Matthew C Hall; Parthiv J Mahadevia
Journal:  Clin Pediatr (Phila)       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 1.168

4.  The private demand for Hib vaccination in a probable low Hib disease incidence country: Thailand 2006.

Authors:  Charung Muangchana; David Bishai
Journal:  Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 0.267

5.  Recent vaccine mandates in the United States, Europe and Australia: A comparative study.

Authors:  Katie Attwell; Mark C Navin; Pier Luigi Lopalco; Christine Jestin; Sabine Reiter; Saad B Omer
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  Development and validation of an instrument to assess perceived social influence on health behaviors.

Authors:  Cheryl L Holt; Eddie M Clark; David L Roth; Martha Crowther; Connie Kohler; Mona Fouad; Rusty Foushee; Patricia A Lee; Penny L Southward
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2010-06-03

7.  Public preferences for vaccination programmes during pandemics caused by pathogens transmitted through respiratory droplets - a discrete choice experiment in four European countries, 2013.

Authors:  Domino Determann; Ida J Korfage; Angela Fagerlin; Ewout W Steyerberg; Michiel C Bliemer; Helene A Voeten; Jan Hendrik Richardus; Mattijs S Lambooij; Esther W de Bekker-Grob
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2016-06-02

8.  Conjoint analysis of French and German parents' willingness to pay for meningococcal vaccine.

Authors:  David Bishai; Roger Brice; Isabelle Girod; Aneta Saleh; Jenifer Ehreth
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  The impact of social networks on parents' vaccination decisions.

Authors:  Emily K Brunson
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user's guide.

Authors:  Emily Lancsar; Jordan Louviere
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.