Literature DB >> 36260638

No fry zones: How restaurant distribution and abundance influence avian communities in the Phoenix, AZ metropolitan area.

Jeffrey A Brown1, Susannah B Lerman2, Anthony J Basile3, Heather L Bateman4, Pierre Deviche3, Paige S Warren5, Karen L Sweazea3,6.   

Abstract

Urbanization is one of the most widespread and extreme examples of habitat alteration. As humans dominate landscapes, they introduce novel elements into environments, including artificial light, noise pollution, and anthropogenic food sources. One understudied form of anthropogenic food is refuse from restaurants, which can alter wildlife populations and, in turn, entire wildlife communities by providing a novel and stable food source. Using data from the Maricopa Association of Governments and the Central Arizona-Phoenix Long Term Ecological Research (CAP LTER) project, we investigated whether and how the distribution of restaurants influences avian communities. The research aimed to identify restaurants, and thus the associated food they may provide, as the driver of potential patterns by controlling for other influences of urbanization, including land cover and the total number of businesses. Using generalized linear mixed models, we tested whether the number of restaurants within 1 km of bird monitoring locations predict avian community richness and abundance and individual species abundance and occurrence patterns. Results indicate that restaurants may decrease avian species diversity and increase overall abundance. Additionally, restaurants may be a significant predictor of the overall abundance of urban-exploiting species, including rock pigeon (Columba livia), mourning dove (Zenaida macroura), and Inca dove (Columbina Inca). Understanding how birds utilize anthropogenic food sources can inform possible conservation or wildlife management practices. As this study highlights only correlations, we suggest further experimental work to address the physiological ramifications of consuming anthropogenic foods provided by restaurants and studies to quantify how frequently anthropogenic food sources are used compared to naturally occurring sources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36260638      PMCID: PMC9581420          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269334

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


  33 in total

Review 1.  Defaunation in the Anthropocene.

Authors:  Rodolfo Dirzo; Hillary S Young; Mauro Galetti; Gerardo Ceballos; Nick J B Isaac; Ben Collen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Non-linearities in bird responses across urbanization gradients: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Péter Batáry; Kornélia Kurucz; Marcela Suarez-Rubio; Dan E Chamberlain
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 10.863

3.  Defining the anthropocene.

Authors:  Simon L Lewis; Mark A Maslin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Model averaging and muddled multimodel inferences.

Authors:  Brian S Cade
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 5.499

5.  Noise pollution filters bird communities based on vocal frequency.

Authors:  Clinton D Francis; Catherine P Ortega; Alexander Cruz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Activity patterns during food provisioning are affected by artificial light in free living great tits (Parus major).

Authors:  Mieke Titulaer; Kamiel Spoelstra; Cynthia Y M J G Lange; Marcel E Visser
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Detectability in Audio-Visual Surveys of Tropical Rainforest Birds: The Influence of Species, Weather and Habitat Characteristics.

Authors:  Alexander S Anderson; Tiago A Marques; Luke P Shoo; Stephen E Williams
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Experimental evidence of impacts of an invasive parakeet on foraging behavior of native birds.

Authors:  Hannah L Peck; Henrietta E Pringle; Harry H Marshall; Ian P F Owens; Alexa M Lord
Journal:  Behav Ecol       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 2.671

9.  Likeability of Garden Birds: Importance of Species Knowledge & Richness in Connecting People to Nature.

Authors:  Daniel T C Cox; Kevin J Gaston
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Consumers discard a lot more food than widely believed: Estimates of global food waste using an energy gap approach and affluence elasticity of food waste.

Authors:  Monika van den Bos Verma; Linda de Vreede; Thom Achterbosch; Martine M Rutten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.