Literature DB >> 29080260

Non-linearities in bird responses across urbanization gradients: A meta-analysis.

Péter Batáry1,2, Kornélia Kurucz3, Marcela Suarez-Rubio4, Dan E Chamberlain5.   

Abstract

Urbanization is one of the most extreme forms of environmental alteration, posing a major threat to biodiversity. We studied the effects of urbanization on avian communities via a systematic review using hierarchical and categorical meta-analyses. Altogether, we found 42 observations from 37 case studies for species richness and 23 observations from 20 case studies for abundance. Urbanization had an overall strong negative effect on bird species richness, whereas abundance increased marginally with urbanization. There was no evidence that city size played a role in influencing the relationship between urbanization and either species richness or abundance. Studies that examined long gradients (i.e. from urban to rural) were more likely to detect negative urbanization effects on species richness than studies that considered short gradients (i.e. urban vs. suburban or urban vs. rural areas). In contrast, we found little evidence that the effect of urbanization on abundance was influenced by gradient length. Effects of urbanization on species richness were more negative for studies including public green spaces (parks and other amenity areas) in the sampled landscapes. In contrast, studies performed solely in the urban matrix (i.e. no green spaces) revealed a strong positive effect on bird abundance. When performing subset analyses on urban-suburban, suburban-rural and suburban-natural comparisons, species richness decreased from natural to urban areas, but with a stronger decrease at the urban-suburban interface, whereas bird abundance showed a clear intermediate peak along the urban-rural gradient although abundance in natural areas was comparable to that in suburban areas. This suggests that species loss happens especially at the urban-suburban interface, and that the highest abundances occur in suburban areas compared to urban or rural areas. Thus, our study shows the importance of suburban areas, where the majority of birds occur with fairly high species richness.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords:  abundance; biodiversity; city size; gradient length; rural; species richness; suburban; systematic review

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29080260     DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13964

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Glob Chang Biol        ISSN: 1354-1013            Impact factor:   10.863


  6 in total

1.  No fry zones: How restaurant distribution and abundance influence avian communities in the Phoenix, AZ metropolitan area.

Authors:  Jeffrey A Brown; Susannah B Lerman; Anthony J Basile; Heather L Bateman; Pierre Deviche; Paige S Warren; Karen L Sweazea
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.752

2.  Differential post-fledging habitat use of Nearctic-Neotropical migratory birds within an urbanized landscape.

Authors:  Zachary S Ladin; Steffie Van Nieuland; Solny A Adalsteinsson; Vincent D'Amico; Jacob L Bowman; Jeffrey J Buler; Jan M Baetens; Bernard De Baets; W Gregory Shriver
Journal:  Mov Ecol       Date:  2018-08-20       Impact factor: 3.600

3.  Environmental DNA captures native and non-native fish community variations across the lentic and lotic systems of a megacity.

Authors:  Shan Zhang; Yitao Zheng; Aibin Zhan; Chunxia Dong; Jindong Zhao; Meng Yao
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 14.136

4.  Urban Individuals of Three Rove Beetle Species Are Not More Exploratory or Risk-Taking Than Rural Conspecifics.

Authors:  Tibor Magura; Roland Horváth; Szabolcs Mizser; Mária Tóth; Dávid D Nagy; Réka Csicsek; Emőke Balla; Gábor L Lövei
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Bitter fruits of hard labour: diet metabarcoding and telemetry reveal that urban songbirds travel further for lower-quality food.

Authors:  Crinan Jarrett; Luke L Powell; Heather McDevitt; Barbara Helm; Andreanna J Welch
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2020-06-13       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Are There Personality Differences between Rural vs. Urban-Living Individuals of a Specialist Ground Beetle, Carabus convexus?

Authors:  Tibor Magura; Szabolcs Mizser; Roland Horváth; Dávid D Nagy; Mária Tóth; Réka Csicsek; Gábor L Lövei
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.769

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.