Literature DB >> 36260600

Analytical-stochastic model of motor difficulty for three-dimensional manipulation tasks.

Andrea Lucchese1, Salvatore Digiesi1, Carlotta Mummolo1.   

Abstract

Multiple models exist for the evaluation of human motor performance; some of these rely on the Index of Difficulty (ID), a measure to evaluate the difficulty associated to simple reaching tasks. Despite the numerous applications of the ID in reaching movements, the existing formulations are functions of the geometrical features of the task and do not consider the motor behaviour of subjects performing repetitive movements in interaction with the environment. Variability of movements, length of trajectories, subject-specific strength and skill, and required interaction with the environment are all factors that contribute to the motor difficulty experienced by a moving agent (e.g., human, robot) as it repeatedly interacts with the environment during a given task (e.g., target-reaching movement, locomotion, etc.). A novel concept of motor difficulty experienced by an agent executing repetitive end-effector movements is presented in this study. A stochastic ID formulation is proposed that captures the abovementioned factors and applies to general three-dimensional motor tasks. Natural motor variability, inherent in the proposed model, is representative of the flexibility in motor synergies for a given agent-environment interaction: the smaller the flexibility, the greater the experienced difficulty throughout the movement. The quantification of experienced motor difficulty is demonstrated for the case of young healthy subjects performing three-dimensional arm movements during which different objects are manipulated. Results show that subjects' experienced motor difficulty is influenced by the type of object. In particular, a difference in motor difficulty is observed when manipulating objects with different grasp types. The proposed model can be employed as a novel tool to evaluate the motor performance of agents involved in repetitive movements, such as in pick and place and manipulation, with application in both industrial and rehabilitation contexts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36260600      PMCID: PMC9581359          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276308

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


  37 in total

Review 1.  Goal-directed aiming: two components but multiple processes.

Authors:  Digby Elliott; Steve Hansen; Lawrence E M Grierson; James Lyons; Simon J Bennett; Spencer J Hayes
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Optimal movement variability: a new theoretical perspective for neurologic physical therapy.

Authors:  Nicholas Stergiou; Regina Harbourne; James Cavanaugh
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 3.  Toward a new theory of motor synergies.

Authors:  Mark L Latash; John P Scholz; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 1.422

4.  Differential effect of task conditions on errors of direction and extent of reaching movements.

Authors:  J Messier; J F Kalaska
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Exploration of joint redundancy but not task space variability facilitates supervised motor learning.

Authors:  Puneet Singh; Sumitash Jana; Ashitava Ghosal; Aditya Murthy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Analysis of human grasping behavior: object characteristics and grasp type.

Authors:  Thomas Feix; Ian M Bullock; Aaron M Dollar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.487

7.  Adaptive representation of dynamics during learning of a motor task.

Authors:  R Shadmehr; F A Mussa-Ivaldi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Coordination of arm and wrist motion during a reaching task.

Authors:  F Lacquaniti; J F Soechting
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Do humans optimally exploit redundancy to control step variability in walking?

Authors:  Jonathan B Dingwell; Joby John; Joseph P Cusumano
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Analysis of subject specific grasping patterns.

Authors:  Yair Herbst; Lihi Zelnik-Manor; Alon Wolf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.