Literature DB >> 27911808

Exploration of joint redundancy but not task space variability facilitates supervised motor learning.

Puneet Singh1, Sumitash Jana2, Ashitava Ghosal3, Aditya Murthy4.   

Abstract

The number of joints and muscles in a human arm is more than what is required for reaching to a desired point in 3D space. Although previous studies have emphasized how such redundancy and the associated flexibility may play an important role in path planning, control of noise, and optimization of motion, whether and how redundancy might promote motor learning has not been investigated. In this work, we quantify redundancy space and investigate its significance and effect on motor learning. We propose that a larger redundancy space leads to faster learning across subjects. We observed this pattern in subjects learning novel kinematics (visuomotor adaptation) and dynamics (force-field adaptation). Interestingly, we also observed differences in the redundancy space between the dominant hand and nondominant hand that explained differences in the learning of dynamics. Taken together, these results provide support for the hypothesis that redundancy aids in motor learning and that the redundant component of motor variability is not noise.

Entities:  

Keywords:  minimum-intervention principle; motor control; motor noise; reaching; supervised learning

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27911808      PMCID: PMC5167208          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1613383113

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  31 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.

Authors:  Robert L Sainburg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-11-22       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov; Michael I Jordan
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 4.  Optimality principles in sensorimotor control.

Authors:  Emanuel Todorov
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  An implicit plan overrides an explicit strategy during visuomotor adaptation.

Authors:  Pietro Mazzoni; John W Krakauer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Performance variability enables adaptive plasticity of 'crystallized' adult birdsong.

Authors:  Evren C Tumer; Michael S Brainard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Uncontrolled manifold analysis of segmental angle variability during walking: preadolescents with and without Down syndrome.

Authors:  David P Black; Beth A Smith; Jianhua Wu; Beverly D Ulrich
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-24       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

Review 9.  Reinforcement learning control.

Authors:  A G Barto
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 6.627

10.  The Statistical Determinants of the Speed of Motor Learning.

Authors:  Kang He; You Liang; Farnaz Abdollahi; Moria Fisher Bittmann; Konrad Kording; Kunlin Wei
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.475

View more
  15 in total

1.  Alterations in the amplitude and burst rate of beta oscillations impair reward-dependent motor learning in anxiety.

Authors:  Sebastian Sporn; Thomas Hein; Maria Herrojo Ruiz
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  The effect of proprioceptive acuity variability on motor adaptation in older adults.

Authors:  Yuming Lei; Jinsung Wang
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Visuomotor Adaptation of Lower Extremity Movements During Virtual Ball-Kicking Task.

Authors:  Mai Moriyama; Motoki Kouzaki; Shota Hagio
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-06-23

4.  Analytical-stochastic model of motor difficulty for three-dimensional manipulation tasks.

Authors:  Andrea Lucchese; Salvatore Digiesi; Carlotta Mummolo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.752

5.  It's Not (Only) the Mean that Matters: Variability, Noise and Exploration in Skill Learning.

Authors:  Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2018-03-01

6.  Neural network retuning and neural predictors of learning success associated with cello training.

Authors:  Indiana Wollman; Virginia Penhune; Melanie Segado; Thibaut Carpentier; Robert J Zatorre
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Constraints on neural redundancy.

Authors:  Aaron P Batista; Byron M Yu; Steven M Chase; Jay A Hennig; Matthew D Golub; Peter J Lund; Patrick T Sadtler; Emily R Oby; Kristin M Quick; Stephen I Ryu; Elizabeth C Tyler-Kabara
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-08-15       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Back to reality: differences in learning strategy in a simplified virtual and a real throwing task.

Authors:  Zhaoran Zhang; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Quantitative Assessment of Learning and Retention in Virtual Vocal Function Exercises.

Authors:  Jarrad H Van Stan; Se-Woong Park; Matthew Jarvis; Joseph Stemple; Robert E Hillman; Dagmar Sternad
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Dissociating Sensorimotor Recovery and Compensation During Exoskeleton Training Following Stroke.

Authors:  Nadir Nibras; Chang Liu; Denis Mottet; Chunji Wang; David Reinkensmeyer; Olivier Remy-Neris; Isabelle Laffont; Nicolas Schweighofer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.