Literature DB >> 36260556

Are synchronous chats a silver lining of emergency remote instruction? Text-based chatting is disproportionately favored by women in a non-majors introductory biology course.

Rachael D Robnett1, Cissy J Ballen2, Sheritta Fagbodun3, Kelly Lane4, Sophie J McCoy5, Lecia Robinson3, Ebony I Weems6, Sehoya Cotner7,4.   

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a reimagining of many aspects of higher education, including how instructors interact with their students and how they encourage student participation. Text-based chatting during synchronous remote instruction is a simple form of student-student and student-instructor interaction. The importance of student participation has been documented, as have clear disparities in participation between those well-represented and those under-represented in science disciplines. Thus, we conducted an investigation into who is texting, what students are texting, and how these texts align with course content. We focused on two sections of a large-enrollment, introductory biology class offered remotely during Fall 2020. Using an analysis of in-class chatting, in combination with student survey responses, we find that text-based chatting suggests not only a high level of student engagement, but a type of participation that is disproportionately favored by women. Given the multiple lines of evidence indicating that women typically under-participate in their science courses, any vehicle that counters this trend merits further exploration. We conclude with suggestions for further research, and ideas for carrying forward text-based chatting in the post-COVID-19, in-person classroom.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36260556      PMCID: PMC9581347          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0273301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.752


  21 in total

1.  Gender Gap in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Current Knowledge, Implications for Practice, Policy, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Ming-Te Wang; Jessica L Degol
Journal:  Educ Psychol Rev       Date:  2016-01-13

2.  Reconsidering the Share of a Think-Pair-Share: Emerging Limitations, Alternatives, and Opportunities for Research.

Authors:  Katelyn M Cooper; Jeffrey N Schinske; Kimberly D Tanner
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Structure matters: twenty-one teaching strategies to promote student engagement and cultivate classroom equity.

Authors:  Kimberly D Tanner
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.325

4.  Gender gaps in achievement and participation in multiple introductory biology classrooms.

Authors:  Sarah L Eddy; Sara E Brownell; Mary Pat Wenderoth
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Do Biology Majors Really Differ from Non-STEM Majors?

Authors:  Sehoya Cotner; Seth Thompson; Robin Wright
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Student Anxiety and Perception of Difficulty Impact Performance and Persistence in Introductory Biology Courses.

Authors:  Benjamin J England; Jennifer R Brigati; Elisabeth E Schussler; Miranda M Chen
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Student Engagement Declines in STEM Undergraduates during COVID-19-Driven Remote Learning.

Authors:  Emma R Wester; Lisa L Walsh; Sandra Arango-Caro; Kristine L Callis-Duehl
Journal:  J Microbiol Biol Educ       Date:  2021-03-31

8.  Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate science, technology, engineering, and math.

Authors:  Elli J Theobald; Mariah J Hill; Elisa Tran; Sweta Agrawal; E Nicole Arroyo; Shawn Behling; Nyasha Chambwe; Dianne Laboy Cintrón; Jacob D Cooper; Gideon Dunster; Jared A Grummer; Kelly Hennessey; Jennifer Hsiao; Nicole Iranon; Leonard Jones; Hannah Jordt; Marlowe Keller; Melissa E Lacey; Caitlin E Littlefield; Alexander Lowe; Shannon Newman; Vera Okolo; Savannah Olroyd; Brandon R Peecook; Sarah B Pickett; David L Slager; Itzue W Caviedes-Solis; Kathryn E Stanchak; Vasudha Sundaravardan; Camila Valdebenito; Claire R Williams; Kaitlin Zinsli; Scott Freeman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-03-09       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Gender Differences in Student Participation in an Active-Learning Classroom.

Authors:  Stepfanie M Aguillon; Gregor-Fausto Siegmund; Renee H Petipas; Abby Grace Drake; Sehoya Cotner; Cissy J Ballen
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  A Call for Data-Driven Networks to Address Equity in the Context of Undergraduate Biology.

Authors:  Seth K Thompson; Sadie Hebert; Sara Berk; Rebecca Brunelli; Catherine Creech; Abby Grace Drake; Sheritta Fagbodun; Marcos E Garcia-Ojeda; Carrie Hall; Jordan Harshman; Todd Lamb; Rachael Robnett; Michèle Shuster; Sehoya Cotner; Cissy J Ballen
Journal:  CBE Life Sci Educ       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 3.325

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.