Literature DB >> 36255495

Gray whale density during seismic surveys near their Sakhalin feeding ground.

Glenn Gailey1, Mikhail Zykov2, Olga Sychenko3, Alexander Rutenko4, Arny L Blanchard5, Lisanne Aerts6, Rodger H Melton7.   

Abstract

Oil and gas development off northeastern Sakhalin Island, Russia, has exposed the western gray whale population on their summer-fall foraging grounds to a range of anthropogenic activities, such as pile driving, dredging, pipeline installation, and seismic surveys. In 2015, the number of seismic surveys within a feeding season surpassed the level of the number and duration of previous seismic survey activities known to have occurred close to the gray whales' feeding ground, with the potential to cause disturbance to their feeding activity. To examine the extent that gray whales were potentially avoiding areas when exposed to seismic and vessel sounds, shore-based teams monitored the abundance and distribution of gray whales from 13 stations that encompassed the known nearshore feeding area. Gray whale density was examined in relation to natural (spatial, temporal, and prey energy) and anthropogenic (cumulative sound exposure from vessel and seismic sounds) explanatory variables using Generalized Additive Models (GAM). Distance from shore, water depth, date, and northing explained a significant amount of variation in gray whale densities. Prey energy from crustaceans, specifically amphipods, isopods, and cumaceans also significantly influenced gray whale densities in the nearshore feeding area. Increasing cumulative exposure to vessel and seismic sounds resulted in both a short- and longer-term decline in gray whale density in an area. This study provides further insights about western gray whale responses to anthropogenic activity in proximity to and within the nearshore feeding area. As the frequency of seismic surveys and other non-oil and gas anthropogenic activity are expected to increase off Sakhalin Island, it is critical to continue to monitor and assess potential impacts on this endangered population of gray whales.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distribution; Disturbance; Seismic survey; Sound exposure levels; Vessel activity; Western gray whale

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36255495      PMCID: PMC9579086          DOI: 10.1007/s10661-022-10025-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   3.307


  14 in total

1.  Critically endangered western gray whales migrate to the eastern North Pacific.

Authors:  Bruce R Mate; Valentin Yu Ilyashenko; Amanda L Bradford; Vladimir V Vertyankin; Grigory A Tsidulko; Vyacheslav V Rozhnov; Ladd M Irvine
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.703

Review 2.  A critical review of the potential impacts of marine seismic surveys on fish & invertebrates.

Authors:  A G Carroll; R Przeslawski; A Duncan; M Gunning; B Bruce
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 5.553

3.  Prey biomass dynamics in gray whale feeding areas adjacent to northeastern Sakhalin (the Sea of Okhotsk), Russia, 2001-2015.

Authors:  Arny L Blanchard; Natalia L Demchenko; Lise A M Aerts; Sergei B Yazvenko; Victor V Ivin; Ilya Shcherbakov; H Rodger Melton
Journal:  Mar Environ Res       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 3.130

4.  Distribution and abundance of western gray whales during a seismic survey near Sakhalin Island, Russia.

Authors:  S B Yazvenko; T L McDonald; S A Blokhin; S R Johnson; S K Meier; H R Melton; M W Newcomer; R M Nielson; V L Vladimirov; P W Wainwright
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Size matters: management of stress responses and chronic stress in beaked whales and other marine mammals may require larger exclusion zones.

Authors:  Andrew J Wright; Terrence Deak; E C M Parsons
Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 5.553

6.  The Effect of Climate Variability on Gray Whales (Eschrichtius robustus) within Their Wintering Areas.

Authors:  Christian J Salvadeo; Alejandro Gómez-Gallardo U; Mauricio Nájera-Caballero; Jorge Urbán-Ramirez; Daniel Lluch-Belda
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Effects of sea ice on growth rates of an endangered population of gray whales.

Authors:  G Gailey; O Sychenko; O Tyurneva; Y Yakovlev; V Vertyankin; P van der Wolf; K Drozdov; I Zhmaev
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Context-dependent variability in the predicted daily energetic costs of disturbance for blue whales.

Authors:  Enrico Pirotta; Cormac G Booth; David E Cade; John Calambokidis; Daniel P Costa; James A Fahlbusch; Ari S Friedlaender; Jeremy A Goldbogen; John Harwood; Elliott L Hazen; Leslie New; Brandon L Southall
Journal:  Conserv Physiol       Date:  2021-01-16       Impact factor: 3.079

9.  A western gray whale mitigation and monitoring program for a 3-D seismic survey, Sakhalin Island, Russia.

Authors:  S R Johnson; W J Richardson; S B Yazvenko; S A Blokhin; G Gailey; M R Jenkerson; S K Meier; H R Melton; M W Newcomer; A S Perlov; S A Rutenko; B Würsig; C R Martin; D E Egging
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 10.  Understanding the population consequences of disturbance.

Authors:  Enrico Pirotta; Cormac G Booth; Daniel P Costa; Erica Fleishman; Scott D Kraus; David Lusseau; David Moretti; Leslie F New; Robert S Schick; Lisa K Schwarz; Samantha E Simmons; Len Thomas; Peter L Tyack; Michael J Weise; Randall S Wells; John Harwood
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.