Literature DB >> 27931868

A critical review of the potential impacts of marine seismic surveys on fish & invertebrates.

A G Carroll1, R Przeslawski2, A Duncan3, M Gunning4, B Bruce5.   

Abstract

Marine seismic surveys produce high intensity, low-frequency impulsive sounds at regular intervals, with most sound produced between 10 and 300Hz. Offshore seismic surveys have long been considered to be disruptive to fisheries, but there are few ecological studies that target commercially important species, particularly invertebrates. This review aims to summarise scientific studies investigating the impacts of low-frequency sound on marine fish and invertebrates, as well as to critically evaluate how such studies may apply to field populations exposed to seismic operations. We focus on marine seismic surveys due to their associated unique sound properties (i.e. acute, low-frequency, mobile source locations), as well as fish and invertebrates due to the commercial value of many species in these groups. The main challenges of seismic impact research are the translation of laboratory results to field populations over a range of sound exposure scenarios and the lack of sound exposure standardisation which hinders the identification of response thresholds. An integrated multidisciplinary approach to manipulative and in situ studies is the most effective way to establish impact thresholds in the context of realistic exposure levels, but if that is not practical the limitations of each approach must be carefully considered. Crown
Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anthropogenic noise; Low-frequency sound; Marine fauna; Response indicators

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27931868     DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.11.038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull        ISSN: 0025-326X            Impact factor:   5.553


  12 in total

1.  Seismic air guns damage rock lobster mechanosensory organs and impair righting reflex.

Authors:  Ryan D Day; Robert D McCauley; Quinn P Fitzgibbon; Klaas Hartmann; Jayson M Semmens
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Natural and Anthropogenic Sources of Seismic, Hydroacoustic, and Infrasonic Waves: Waveforms and Spectral Characteristics (and Their Applicability for Sensor Calibration).

Authors:  Michaela Schwardt; Christoph Pilger; Peter Gaebler; Patrick Hupe; Lars Ceranna
Journal:  Surv Geophys       Date:  2022-07-25       Impact factor: 7.965

3.  Gray whale density during seismic surveys near their Sakhalin feeding ground.

Authors:  Glenn Gailey; Mikhail Zykov; Olga Sychenko; Alexander Rutenko; Arny L Blanchard; Lisanne Aerts; Rodger H Melton
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 3.307

4.  Population-level effects of acoustic disturbance in Atlantic cod: a size-structured analysis based on energy budgets.

Authors:  Floor H Soudijn; Tobias van Kooten; Hans Slabbekoorn; André M de Roos
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Avoidance of seismic survey activities by penguins.

Authors:  Lorien Pichegru; Reason Nyengera; Alistair M McInnes; Pierre Pistorius
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A proteomic analysis of the statocyst endolymph in common cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis): an assessment of acoustic trauma after exposure to sound.

Authors:  M Solé; M Monge; M André; C Quero
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Finding a home in the noise: cross-modal impact of anthropogenic vibration on animal search behaviour.

Authors:  Louise Roberts; Mark E Laidre
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 2.422

8.  Acoustic impact of a wave energy converter in Mediterranean shallow waters.

Authors:  Giuseppa Buscaino; Giuliana Mattiazzo; Gianmaria Sannino; Elena Papale; Giovanni Bracco; Rosario Grammauta; Adriana Carillo; Jose Maria Kenny; Norma De Cristofaro; Maria Ceraulo; Salvatore Mazzola
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  A critical period of susceptibility to sound in the sensory cells of cephalopod hatchlings.

Authors:  Marta Solé; Marc Lenoir; José-Manuel Fortuño; Mike van der Schaar; Michel André
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 2.422

10.  A large-scale experiment finds no evidence that a seismic survey impacts a demersal fish fauna.

Authors:  Mark G Meekan; Conrad W Speed; Robert D McCauley; Rebecca Fisher; Matthew J Birt; Leanne M Currey-Randall; Jayson M Semmens; Stephen J Newman; Katherine Cure; Marcus Stowar; Brigit Vaughan; Miles J G Parsons
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-07-27       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.