Literature DB >> 3625348

Influence of contrast on foveal and peripheral detection of coherent motion in moving random-dot patterns.

W A van de Grind, J J Koenderink, A J van Doorn.   

Abstract

The detection of coherent motion was studied in stroboscopically displayed moving random-dot patterns disturbed by incoherent noise. We determined the threshold signal-to-noise ratio S as a function of velocity V at eccentricities of 0 degrees, 3 degrees, 6 degrees, 12 degrees, 24 degrees, 48 degrees in the temporal visual field of the right eye. At each eccentricity the measurements of S = f(V) were repeated for a range of rms contrast values from 60% (0 dB) in steps of 3 dB down to 1.9% (-30 dB). All stimuli were scaled with eccentricity to keep the ratio of pixel size to acuity constant (about 2). It is shown that the S values in our paradigm are never determined by contrast-threshold effects. They are true correlational thresholds. Bilocal movement detectors are assumed to underlie the detection of coherent motion. The bilocal correlation proves to be rather insensitive to rms contrast down to contrast levels of about 10%. Despite the eccentricity scaling, which is quite effective at high contrast levels, differences between the eccentricities become noticeable at lower contrast levels (below about 30-20%). The fovea is the least, and the far periphery the most, resistent to contrast degradation.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3625348     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.4.001643

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A        ISSN: 0740-3232            Impact factor:   2.129


  6 in total

1.  Viewing-distance invariance of movement detection.

Authors:  W A van de Grind; J J Koenderink; A J van Doorn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Abnormalities of coherent motion processing in strabismic amblyopia: Visual-evoked potential measurements.

Authors:  Chuan Hou; Mark W Pettet; Anthony M Norcia
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Local motion processing limits fine direction discrimination in the periphery.

Authors:  Isabelle Mareschal; Peter J Bex; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Effects of retinal eccentricity and acuity on global-motion processing.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Bower; Zheng Bian; George J Andersen
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Temporal Limits of Visual Motion Processing: Psychophysics and Neurophysiology.

Authors:  Bart G Borghuis; Duje Tadin; Martin J M Lankheet; Joseph S Lappin; Wim A van de Grind
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-01-26

6.  Is Peripheral Motion Detection Affected by Myopia?

Authors:  Junhan Wei; Deying Kong; Xi Yu; Lili Wei; Yue Xiong; Adeline Yang; Björn Drobe; Jinhua Bao; Jiawei Zhou; Yi Gao; Zhifen He
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 4.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.