Literature DB >> 3625331

Cone spacing and the visual resolution limit.

D R Williams, N J Coletta.   

Abstract

It is commonly assumed that the visual resolution limit must be equal to or less than the Nyquist frequency of the cone mosaic. However, under some conditions, observers can see fine patterns at the correct orientation when viewing interference fringes with spatial frequencies that are as much as about 1.5 times higher than the nominal Nyquist frequency of the underlying cone mosaic. The existence of this visual ability demands a closer scrutiny of the sampling effects of the cone mosaic and the information that is sufficient for an observer to resolve a sinusoidal grating. The Nyquist frequency specifies which images can be reconstructed without aliasing by an imaging system that samples discretely. However, it is not a theoretical upper bound for psychophysical measures of visual resolution because the observer's criteria for resolving sinusoidal gratings are less stringent than the criteria specified by the sampling theorem for perfect, alias-free image reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3625331     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.4.001514

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A        ISSN: 0740-3232            Impact factor:   2.129


  41 in total

1.  Paraxial analysis of the depth of field of a pseudophakic eye with accommodating intraocular lens.

Authors:  Jit B Ale; Fabrice Manns; Arthur Ho
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  The organization of the cone photoreceptor mosaic measured in the living human retina.

Authors:  Lucie Sawides; Alberto de Castro; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Variability in Human Cone Topography Assessed by Adaptive Optics Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  Tianjiao Zhang; Pooja Godara; Ernesto R Blanco; Russell L Griffin; Xiaolin Wang; Christine A Curcio; Yuhua Zhang
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 5.258

4.  Visual fields, eye movements, and scanning behavior of a sit-and-wait predator, the black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans).

Authors:  Megan D Gall; Esteban Fernández-Juricic
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Imaging retinal mosaics in the living eye.

Authors:  E A Rossi; M Chung; A Dubra; J J Hunter; W H Merigan; D R Williams
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  The relationship between visual resolution and cone spacing in the human fovea.

Authors:  Ethan A Rossi; Austin Roorda
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-20       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Imaging translucent cell bodies in the living mouse retina without contrast agents.

Authors:  A Guevara-Torres; D R Williams; J B Schallek
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Evaluating outer segment length as a surrogate measure of peak foveal cone density.

Authors:  Melissa A Wilk; Brandon M Wilk; Christopher S Langlo; Robert F Cooper; Joseph Carroll
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  High speed adaptive optics ophthalmoscopy with an anamorphic point spread function.

Authors:  Jing Lu; Boyu Gu; Xiaolin Wang; Yuhua Zhang
Journal:  Opt Express       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Visual acuity in larval zebrafish: behavior and histology.

Authors:  Marion F Haug; Oliver Biehlmaier; Kaspar P Mueller; Stephan Cf Neuhauss
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 3.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.