Literature DB >> 3625328

Does cone positional disorder limit resolution?

J Hirsch, W H Miller.   

Abstract

We measure the center-to-center spacings and disorder in spacings between all pairs of cones in a strip of primate retina extending from the foveal center to approximately 5.75 deg of retinal eccentricity along the temporal horizontal meridian. The strip is partitioned into windows, and the positions of the cone centers in each lattice window are digitized for analysis of lattice structure and quality. We find a nearly monotonic increase in cone spacing with eccentricity. The cone mosaic is a high-quality hexagonal lattice near the foveal center, and cone positional disorder (jitter) relative to averaging spacing increases beyond about 1.5 deg. We estimate human acuity measured through the optics of the eye over a retinal region comparable with our lattice strip by pooling the results of previous investigators. When the monkey lattice is scaled to human foveal resolution, application of the sampling theorem to average cone spacing predicts these pooled visual-acuity data from the foveal center to about 1.5 deg and overestimates visual acuity more eccentrically. Orientation reversal, a new technique developed by Coletta and Williams [J. Opt. Soc. Am. 4, 1503 (1987)] for estimating the Nyquist limit, estimates Nyquist frequencies from the foveal edge to beyond 5 deg of retinal eccentricity that agree with the cutoff frequencies predicted on the basis of our average spacing measurements. We conclude that the sampling theorem based on average spacing alone predicts the Nyquist limit from the foveal center to about 5 deg when that limit is measured by using the new aliasing technique.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3625328     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.4.001481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A        ISSN: 0740-3232            Impact factor:   2.129


  13 in total

1.  Fine structure of parvocellular receptive fields in the primate fovea revealed by laser interferometry.

Authors:  M J McMahon; M J Lankheet; P Lennie; D R Williams
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-03-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Influence of sampling window size and orientation on parafoveal cone packing density.

Authors:  Marco Lombardo; Sebastiano Serrao; Pietro Ducoli; Giuseppe Lombardo
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Variability in Human Cone Topography Assessed by Adaptive Optics Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscopy.

Authors:  Tianjiao Zhang; Pooja Godara; Ernesto R Blanco; Russell L Griffin; Xiaolin Wang; Christine A Curcio; Yuhua Zhang
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 4.  Advances in understanding the molecular basis of the first steps in color vision.

Authors:  Lukas Hofmann; Krzysztof Palczewski
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 21.198

5.  Methods for investigating the local spatial anisotropy and the preferred orientation of cones in adaptive optics retinal images.

Authors:  Robert F Cooper; Marco Lombardo; Joseph Carroll; Kenneth R Sloan; Giuseppe Lombardo
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.241

6.  The mechanisms of vision loss associated with a cotton wool spot.

Authors:  Toco Y P Chui; Larry N Thibos; Arthur Bradley; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  Effect of sampling array irregularity and window size on the discrimination of sampled gratings.

Authors:  David W Evans; Yizhong Wang; Kevin M Haggerty; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Quantification of changes in metamorphopsia and retinal contraction in eyes with spontaneous separation of idiopathic epiretinal membrane.

Authors:  H Nomoto; C Matsumoto; E Arimura; S Okuyama; S Takada; S Hashimoto; Y Shimomura
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Individual variations in human cone photoreceptor packing density: variations with refractive error.

Authors:  Toco Yuen Ping Chui; Hongxin Song; Stephen A Burns
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-06-14       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Cone photoreceptor definition on adaptive optics retinal imaging.

Authors:  Manickam Nick Muthiah; Carlos Gias; Fred Kuanfu Chen; Joe Zhong; Zoe McClelland; Ferenc B Sallo; Tunde Peto; Peter J Coffey; Lyndon da Cruz
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-04-11       Impact factor: 4.638

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.