Literature DB >> 36253044

Impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy-related healthcare utilisation: a prospective nationwide registry study.

Carl Michael Baravelli1, Ferenc Macsali2,3, Kjetil Telle4, Jonas Minet Kinge5,2,6, Laura Oakley2,7, Maria C Magnus2, Siri Eldevik Håberg2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy-related healthcare utilisation and differences across social groups.
DESIGN: Nationwide longitudinal prospective registry-based study.
SETTING: Norway. PARTICIPANTS: Female residents aged 15-50 years (n=1 244 560). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pregnancy-related inpatient, outpatient and primary care healthcare utilisation before the COVID-19 pandemic (prepandemic: 1 January to 11 March 2020), during the initial lockdown (first wave: 12 March to 3 April 2020), during the summer months of low restrictions (summer period: 4 April to 31 August 2020) and during the second wave to the end of the year (second wave: 1 September to 31 December 2020). Rates were compared with the same time periods in 2019.
RESULTS: There were 130 924 inpatient specialist care admissions, 266 015 outpatient specialist care consultations and 2 309 047 primary care consultations with pregnancy-related diagnostic codes during 2019 and 2020. After adjusting for time trends and cofactors, inpatient admissions were reduced by 9% (adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR)=0.91, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.95), outpatient consultations by 17% (aIRR=0.83, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.86) and primary care consultations by 10% (aIRR=0.90, 95% CI 0.89 to 0.91) during the first wave. Inpatient care remained 3%-4% below prepandemic levels throughout 2020. Reductions according to education, income and immigrant background were also observed. Notably, women born in Asia, Africa or Latin America had a greater reduction in inpatient (aIRR=0.87, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.97) and outpatient (aIRR 0.90, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.95) care during the first wave, compared with Norwegian-born women. We also observed that women with low education had a greater reduction in inpatient care during summer period (aIRR=0.88, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.92), compared with women with high educational attainment.
CONCLUSION: Following the introduction of COVID-19 mitigation measures in Norway in March 2020, there were substantial reductions in pregnancy-related healthcare utilisation, especially during the initial lockdown and among women with an immigrant background. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; obstetrics; quality in health care

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36253044      PMCID: PMC9577276          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   3.006


  15 in total

1.  Pregnant women's concerns and antenatal care during COVID-19 lock-down of the Danish society.

Authors:  Gritt Overbeck; Anette Hauskov Graungaard; Ida Scheel Rasmussen; Julie Høgsgaard Andersen; Ruth Kirk Ertmann; Jakob Kragstrup; Philip Wilson
Journal:  Dan Med J       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 1.240

Review 2.  The Norwegian Patient Registry and the Norwegian Registry for Primary Health Care: Research potential of two nationwide health-care registries.

Authors:  Inger Johanne Bakken; Anja M S Ariansen; Gun Peggy Knudsen; Knut Ivar Johansen; Stein Emil Vollset
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 3.021

3.  Lockdown with a Price: The impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Prenatal Care and Perinatal Outcomes in a Tertiary Care Center.

Authors:  Naftali Justman; Gilad Shahak; Ola Gutzeit; Dikla Ben Zvi; Yuval Ginsberg; Ido Solt; Dana Vitner; Ron Beloosesky; Zeev Weiner; Yaniv Zipori
Journal:  Isr Med Assoc J       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 0.892

4.  The association of maternal country of birth and education with hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: A population-based study of 960 516 deliveries in Norway.

Authors:  Kristina Baker Sole; Anne Cathrine Staff; Katariina Laine
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2018-08-02       Impact factor: 3.636

5.  Global, regional, and national mortality among young people aged 10-24 years, 1950-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 202.731

6.  Changes in preterm birth and caesarean deliveries in the United States during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Authors:  Alison Gemmill; Joan A Casey; Ralph Catalano; Deborah Karasek; Claire E Margerison; Tim Bruckner
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 3.103

7.  Admissions to Norwegian Hospitals during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Jon Helgeland; Kjetil E Telle; Mari Grøsland; Beate M Huseby; Siri Håberg; Anja S E Lindman
Journal:  Scand J Public Health       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 8.  Prenatal health of immigrant women in Norway - an exploratory literature review.

Authors:  Sukhjeet Bains; Karolina S Mæland; Eline S Vik
Journal:  Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen       Date:  2021-02-01

9.  Preterm birth after the introduction of COVID-19 mitigation measures in Norway, Sweden, and Denmark: a registry-based difference-in-differences study.

Authors:  Laura L Oakley; Anne K Örtqvist; Jonas Kinge; Anne Vinkel Hansen; Tanja Gram Petersen; Jonas Söderling; Kjetil E Telle; Maria C Magnus; Laust Hvas Mortensen; Anne-Marie Nybo Andersen; Olof Stephansson; Siri E Håberg
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2021-11-11       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on maternal health due to delay in seeking health care: Experience from a tertiary center.

Authors:  Manu Goyal; Pratibha Singh; Kuldeep Singh; Shashank Shekhar; Neha Agrawal; Sanjeev Misra
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 4.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.