Literature DB >> 33269695

Pregnant women's concerns and antenatal care during COVID-19 lock-down of the Danish society.

Gritt Overbeck1, Anette Hauskov Graungaard, Ida Scheel Rasmussen, Julie Høgsgaard Andersen, Ruth Kirk Ertmann, Jakob Kragstrup, Philip Wilson.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Pandemics are known to cause stress and anxiety in pregnant women. During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown of the Danish society, pregnant women were considered to be at increased risk, and access to antenatal care changed.
METHODS: On 8 April 2020A, a questionnaire was sent to 332 pregnant women previously sampled by general practitioners in two Danish regions. The women were contacted via secured e-mail (e-Boks), and questionnaires were returned until 6 May.
RESULTS: The questionnaire was returned by 257 women (77%). More than half believed that they were at a high risk of infection with COVID-19, and a third of the women were concerned about the risk of serious disease - especially for their unborn child. Almost 90% isolated at home most of the time. The majority were worried about possible consequences of the pandemic for antenatal care, but very few had actually missed a scheduled preventive consultation with their general practitioner, and only 15% had missed an appointment with their midwife. The majority of the women preferred normal consultations and found no added safety in shifting the consultation from the normal clinical setting.
CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic and lockdown have had a major impact on Danish pregnant women. Even so, concerns were more focused on access to care than on the risk of COVID-19 infection. Contacts with the antenatal healthcare system have only been moderately affected. FUNDING: TRYG Foundation and KEU, Region Copenhagen. TRIAL REGISTRATION: not relevant. Articles published in the DMJ are “open access”. This means that the articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33269695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dan Med J        ISSN: 2245-1919            Impact factor:   1.240


  6 in total

1.  Impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy-related healthcare utilisation: a prospective nationwide registry study.

Authors:  Carl Michael Baravelli; Ferenc Macsali; Kjetil Telle; Jonas Minet Kinge; Laura Oakley; Maria C Magnus; Siri Eldevik Håberg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 3.006

2.  Pregnant under quarantine: Women's agency and access to medical care under Wuhan's COVID-19 lockdown.

Authors:  Amy Hanser; Yue Qian
Journal:  SSM Qual Res Health       Date:  2022-05-17

Review 3.  A Comprehensive Analysis of Maternal and Newborn Disease and Related Control for COVID-19.

Authors:  Nevio Cimolai
Journal:  SN Compr Clin Med       Date:  2021-03-17

4.  Maternal, placental and neonatal outcomes after asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection in the first trimester of pregnancy: A case report.

Authors:  Jian-Rong He; Yan-Hua Xiao; Wen Ding; Ya-Ling Shi; Xi He; Xiao-Dan Liu; Guo-Zheng Zhang; Sha-Sha Li; Jin-Qing Su; Li Liang; Liang Zeng; Fang Li; Xiu Qiu
Journal:  Case Rep Womens Health       Date:  2021-05-04

5.  Assessment of the level of anxiety and pain in women who do and do not attend childbirth classes during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.

Authors:  Natalia Kuciel; Edyta Sutkowska; Karolina Biernat; Katarzyna Hap; Justyna Mazurek; Iwona Demczyszak
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-11-02

6.  The experience of women with recent gestational diabetes during the COVID-19 lockdown: a qualitative study from Denmark.

Authors:  Nanna Husted Jensen; Karoline Kragelund Nielsen; Inger Katrine Dahl-Petersen; Helle Terkildsen Maindal
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.