Literature DB >> 36253035

Factors associated with perceived coercion in adults receiving psychiatric care: a scoping review protocol.

Clara Lessard-Deschênes1,2, Marie-Hélène Goulet3,2, Pierre Pariseau-Legault4.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Coercion is inevitably linked to psychiatric and mental healthcare. Though many forms of coercion exist, perceived coercion appears to be a less studied form despite its marked prevalence and negative consequences. In the literature, several factors have been studied for their association with perceived coercion, but few literature reviews have focused on this precise subject. Gaining knowledge of the association between these factors and the degree of perceived coercion is essential to guide future research and develop informed interventions. The purpose of this review will be to identify, in the literature, factors associated with perceived coercion by adults receiving psychiatric care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A scoping review will be conducted by following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. A search with descriptors and keywords will be performed in the following databases: CINAHL, MEDLINE, PUBMED, EMBASE and PsycINFO. Then, a search for grey literature will be conducted, psychiatric and mental health journals will be searched, and reference lists will be examined to identify further pertinent literature. All literature on factors (human, health related, organisational, etc) and their association to perceived coercion by adults (18 and older) in inpatient, outpatient and community-based psychiatry will be included. A quality assessment of the literature included will be performed. The extracted data will be analysed with a method of content analysis. An exploratory search was conducted in September 2021 and will be updated in September 2022 once the evidence selection process is planned to begin. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethics approval is required for this review. The results of this scoping review will be submitted to a scientific journal for publication, presented in conferences and shared with clinicians working in psychiatric and mental healthcare. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adult psychiatry; Mental health; Psychiatry

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36253035      PMCID: PMC9577918          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-065393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   3.006


  27 in total

Review 1.  Coercion in psychiatric care: systematic review of correlates and themes.

Authors:  Giles Newton-Howes; Richard Mullen
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 2.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of factors that help or hinder treatment decision-making capacity in psychosis.

Authors:  Amanda Larkin; Paul Hutton
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 9.319

3.  Quasi-experimental comparison of coercive interventions on client outcomes in individuals with severe and persistent mental illness.

Authors:  Patricia Galon; N Margaret Wineman
Journal:  Arch Psychiatr Nurs       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 2.218

Review 4.  Ethical challenges when using coercion in mental healthcare: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Marit Helene Hem; Elisabeth Gjerberg; Tonje Lossius Husum; Reidar Pedersen
Journal:  Nurs Ethics       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.874

5.  Clinical course and prevalence of coercive measures: an observational study among involuntarily hospitalised psychiatric patients.

Authors:  Florian Hotzy; Sonja Moetteli; Anastasia Theodoridou; Andres Ricardo Schneeberger; Erich Seifritz; Paul Hoff; Matthias Jäger
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 2.193

6.  Therapeutic relationship in the context of perceived coercion in a psychiatric population.

Authors:  Anastasia Theodoridou; Fenissa Schlatter; Vladeta Ajdacic; Wulf Rössler; Matthias Jäger
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 3.222

7.  PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation.

Authors:  Andrea C Tricco; Erin Lillie; Wasifa Zarin; Kelly K O'Brien; Heather Colquhoun; Danielle Levac; David Moher; Micah D J Peters; Tanya Horsley; Laura Weeks; Susanne Hempel; Elie A Akl; Christine Chang; Jessie McGowan; Lesley Stewart; Lisa Hartling; Adrian Aldcroft; Michael G Wilson; Chantelle Garritty; Simon Lewin; Christina M Godfrey; Marilyn T Macdonald; Etienne V Langlois; Karla Soares-Weiser; Jo Moriarty; Tammy Clifford; Özge Tunçalp; Sharon E Straus
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Perceived Coercion Among Patients Admitted in Psychiatric Wards: Italian Results of the EUNOMIA Study.

Authors:  Gaia Sampogna; Mario Luciano; Valeria Del Vecchio; Benedetta Pocai; Carmela Palummo; Giovanna Fico; Vincenzo Giallonardo; Corrado De Rosa; Andrea Fiorillo
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-05-21       Impact factor: 4.157

9.  Effects of Seclusion and Restraint in Adult Psychiatry: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Marie Chieze; Samia Hurst; Stefan Kaiser; Othman Sentissi
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2019-07-16       Impact factor: 4.157

Review 10.  Preventing and reducing 'coercion' in mental health services: an international scoping review of English-language studies.

Authors:  P Gooding; B McSherry; C Roper
Journal:  Acta Psychiatr Scand       Date:  2020-02-09       Impact factor: 6.392

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.