Literature DB >> 36251776

BRACS: A Dataset for BReAst Carcinoma Subtyping in H&E Histology Images.

Nadia Brancati1, Anna Maria Anniciello2, Pushpak Pati3,4, Daniel Riccio1,5, Giosuè Scognamiglio2, Guillaume Jaume3,6, Giuseppe De Pietro1, Maurizio Di Bonito2, Antonio Foncubierta3, Gerardo Botti2, Maria Gabrani3, Florinda Feroce2, Maria Frucci1.   

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and registers the highest number of deaths for women. Advances in diagnostic activities combined with large-scale screening policies have significantly lowered the mortality rates for breast cancer patients. However, the manual inspection of tissue slides by pathologists is cumbersome, time-consuming and is subject to significant inter- and intra-observer variability. Recently, the advent of whole-slide scanning systems has empowered the rapid digitization of pathology slides and enabled the development of Artificial Intelligence (AI)-assisted digital workflows. However, AI techniques, especially Deep Learning, require a large amount of high-quality annotated data to learn from. Constructing such task-specific datasets poses several challenges, such as data-acquisition level constraints, time-consuming and expensive annotations and anonymization of patient information. In this paper, we introduce the BReAst Carcinoma Subtyping (BRACS) dataset, a large cohort of annotated Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E)-stained images to advance AI development in the automatic characterization of breast lesions. BRACS contains 547 Whole-Slide Images (WSIs) and 4539 Regions Of Interest (ROIs) extracted from the WSIs. Each WSI and respective ROIs are annotated by the consensus of three board-certified pathologists into different lesion categories. Specifically, BRACS includes three lesion types, i.e., benign, malignant and atypical, which are further subtyped into seven categories. It is, to the best of our knowledge, the largest annotated dataset for breast cancer subtyping both at WSI and ROI levels. Furthermore, by including the understudied atypical lesions, BRACS offers a unique opportunity for leveraging AI to better understand their characteristics. We encourage AI practitioners to develop and evaluate novel algorithms on the BRACS dataset to further breast cancer diagnosis and patient care. Database URL: https://www.bracs.icar.cnr.it/.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 36251776      PMCID: PMC9575967          DOI: 10.1093/database/baac093

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Database (Oxford)        ISSN: 1758-0463            Impact factor:   4.462


  18 in total

1.  BACH: Grand challenge on breast cancer histology images.

Authors:  Guilherme Aresta; Teresa Araújo; Scotty Kwok; Sai Saketh Chennamsetty; Mohammed Safwan; Varghese Alex; Bahram Marami; Marcel Prastawa; Monica Chan; Michael Donovan; Gerardo Fernandez; Jack Zeineh; Matthias Kohl; Christoph Walz; Florian Ludwig; Stefan Braunewell; Maximilian Baust; Quoc Dang Vu; Minh Nguyen Nhat To; Eal Kim; Jin Tae Kwak; Sameh Galal; Veronica Sanchez-Freire; Nadia Brancati; Maria Frucci; Daniel Riccio; Yaqi Wang; Lingling Sun; Kaiqiang Ma; Jiannan Fang; Ismael Kone; Lahsen Boulmane; Aurélio Campilho; Catarina Eloy; António Polónia; Paulo Aguiar
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 8.545

2.  Conventional Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approach for Multi-Classification of Breast Cancer Histopathology Images-a Comparative Insight.

Authors:  Shallu Sharma; Rajesh Mehra
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Diagnostic Assessment of Deep Learning Algorithms for Detection of Lymph Node Metastases in Women With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Babak Ehteshami Bejnordi; Mitko Veta; Paul Johannes van Diest; Bram van Ginneken; Nico Karssemeijer; Geert Litjens; Jeroen A W M van der Laak; Meyke Hermsen; Quirine F Manson; Maschenka Balkenhol; Oscar Geessink; Nikolaos Stathonikos; Marcory Crf van Dijk; Peter Bult; Francisco Beca; Andrew H Beck; Dayong Wang; Aditya Khosla; Rishab Gargeya; Humayun Irshad; Aoxiao Zhong; Qi Dou; Quanzheng Li; Hao Chen; Huang-Jing Lin; Pheng-Ann Heng; Christian Haß; Elia Bruni; Quincy Wong; Ugur Halici; Mustafa Ümit Öner; Rengul Cetin-Atalay; Matt Berseth; Vitali Khvatkov; Alexei Vylegzhanin; Oren Kraus; Muhammad Shaban; Nasir Rajpoot; Ruqayya Awan; Korsuk Sirinukunwattana; Talha Qaiser; Yee-Wah Tsang; David Tellez; Jonas Annuscheit; Peter Hufnagl; Mira Valkonen; Kimmo Kartasalo; Leena Latonen; Pekka Ruusuvuori; Kaisa Liimatainen; Shadi Albarqouni; Bharti Mungal; Ami George; Stefanie Demirci; Nassir Navab; Seiryo Watanabe; Shigeto Seno; Yoichi Takenaka; Hideo Matsuda; Hady Ahmady Phoulady; Vassili Kovalev; Alexander Kalinovsky; Vitali Liauchuk; Gloria Bueno; M Milagro Fernandez-Carrobles; Ismael Serrano; Oscar Deniz; Daniel Racoceanu; Rui Venâncio
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Hierarchical graph representations in digital pathology.

Authors:  Pushpak Pati; Guillaume Jaume; Antonio Foncubierta-Rodríguez; Florinda Feroce; Anna Maria Anniciello; Giosue Scognamiglio; Nadia Brancati; Maryse Fiche; Estelle Dubruc; Daniel Riccio; Maurizio Di Bonito; Giuseppe De Pietro; Gerardo Botti; Jean-Philippe Thiran; Maria Frucci; Orcun Goksel; Maria Gabrani
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2021-10-27       Impact factor: 8.545

5.  Proteogenomic Landscape of Breast Cancer Tumorigenesis and Targeted Therapy.

Authors:  Karsten Krug; Eric J Jaehnig; Shankha Satpathy; Lili Blumenberg; Alla Karpova; Meenakshi Anurag; George Miles; Philipp Mertins; Yifat Geffen; Lauren C Tang; David I Heiman; Song Cao; Yosef E Maruvka; Jonathan T Lei; Chen Huang; Ramani B Kothadia; Antonio Colaprico; Chet Birger; Jarey Wang; Yongchao Dou; Bo Wen; Zhiao Shi; Yuxing Liao; Maciej Wiznerowicz; Matthew A Wyczalkowski; Xi Steven Chen; Jacob J Kennedy; Amanda G Paulovich; Mathangi Thiagarajan; Christopher R Kinsinger; Tara Hiltke; Emily S Boja; Mehdi Mesri; Ana I Robles; Henry Rodriguez; Thomas F Westbrook; Li Ding; Gad Getz; Karl R Clauser; David Fenyö; Kelly V Ruggles; Bing Zhang; D R Mani; Steven A Carr; Matthew J Ellis; Michael A Gillette
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  Image analysis and machine learning in digital pathology: Challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Anant Madabhushi; George Lee
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2016-07-04       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  A Dataset for Breast Cancer Histopathological Image Classification.

Authors:  Fabio A Spanhol; Luiz S Oliveira; Caroline Petitjean; Laurent Heutte
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Mitosis detection in breast cancer histological images An ICPR 2012 contest.

Authors:  Ludovic Roux; Daniel Racoceanu; Nicolas Loménie; Maria Kulikova; Humayun Irshad; Jacques Klossa; Frédérique Capron; Catherine Genestie; Gilles Le Naour; Metin N Gurcan
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2013-05-30

9.  Classification of breast cancer histology images using Convolutional Neural Networks.

Authors:  Teresa Araújo; Guilherme Aresta; Eduardo Castro; José Rouco; Paulo Aguiar; Catarina Eloy; António Polónia; Aurélio Campilho
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  A Pathologist-Annotated Dataset for Validating Artificial Intelligence: A Project Description and Pilot Study.

Authors:  Sarah N Dudgeon; Si Wen; Matthew G Hanna; Rajarsi Gupta; Mohamed Amgad; Manasi Sheth; Hetal Marble; Richard Huang; Markus D Herrmann; Clifford H Szu; Darick Tong; Bruce Werness; Evan Szu; Denis Larsimont; Anant Madabhushi; Evangelos Hytopoulos; Weijie Chen; Rajendra Singh; Steven N Hart; Ashish Sharma; Joel Saltz; Roberto Salgado; Brandon D Gallas
Journal:  J Pathol Inform       Date:  2021-11-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.