Literature DB >> 34781160

Hierarchical graph representations in digital pathology.

Pushpak Pati1, Guillaume Jaume2, Antonio Foncubierta-Rodríguez3, Florinda Feroce4, Anna Maria Anniciello4, Giosue Scognamiglio4, Nadia Brancati5, Maryse Fiche6, Estelle Dubruc7, Daniel Riccio5, Maurizio Di Bonito4, Giuseppe De Pietro5, Gerardo Botti4, Jean-Philippe Thiran8, Maria Frucci5, Orcun Goksel9, Maria Gabrani3.   

Abstract

Cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy response predictions from tissue specimens highly depend on the phenotype and topological distribution of constituting histological entities. Thus, adequate tissue representations for encoding histological entities is imperative for computer aided cancer patient care. To this end, several approaches have leveraged cell-graphs, capturing the cell-microenvironment, to depict the tissue. These allow for utilizing graph theory and machine learning to map the tissue representation to tissue functionality, and quantify their relationship. Though cellular information is crucial, it is incomplete alone to comprehensively characterize complex tissue structure. We herein treat the tissue as a hierarchical composition of multiple types of histological entities from fine to coarse level, capturing multivariate tissue information at multiple levels. We propose a novel multi-level hierarchical entity-graph representation of tissue specimens to model the hierarchical compositions that encode histological entities as well as their intra- and inter-entity level interactions. Subsequently, a hierarchical graph neural network is proposed to operate on the hierarchical entity-graph and map the tissue structure to tissue functionality. Specifically, for input histology images, we utilize well-defined cells and tissue regions to build HierArchical Cell-to-Tissue (HACT) graph representations, and devise HACT-Net, a message passing graph neural network, to classify the HACT representations. As part of this work, we introduce the BReAst Carcinoma Subtyping (BRACS) dataset, a large cohort of Haematoxylin & Eosin stained breast tumor regions-of-interest, to evaluate and benchmark our proposed methodology against pathologists and state-of-the-art computer-aided diagnostic approaches. Through comparative assessment and ablation studies, our proposed method is demonstrated to yield superior classification results compared to alternative methods as well as individual pathologists. The code, data, and models can be accessed at https://github.com/histocartography/hact-net.
Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast cancer classification; Breast cancer dataset; Cell graph representation; Digital pathology; Hierarchical graph neural network; Hierarchical tissue representation; Tissue graph representation

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34781160     DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102264

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Anal        ISSN: 1361-8415            Impact factor:   8.545


  7 in total

1.  Fast whole-slide cartography in colon cancer histology using superpixels and CNN classification.

Authors:  Frauke Wilm; Michaela Benz; Volker Bruns; Serop Baghdadlian; Jakob Dexl; David Hartmann; Petr Kuritcyn; Martin Weidenfeller; Thomas Wittenberg; Susanne Merkel; Arndt Hartmann; Markus Eckstein; Carol Immanuel Geppert
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2022-03-14

2.  BRACS: A Dataset for BReAst Carcinoma Subtyping in H&E Histology Images.

Authors:  Nadia Brancati; Anna Maria Anniciello; Pushpak Pati; Daniel Riccio; Giosuè Scognamiglio; Guillaume Jaume; Giuseppe De Pietro; Maurizio Di Bonito; Antonio Foncubierta; Gerardo Botti; Maria Gabrani; Florinda Feroce; Maria Frucci
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 4.462

3.  Weakly-supervised tumor purity prediction from frozen H&E stained slides.

Authors:  Matthew Brendel; Vanesa Getseva; Majd Al Assaad; Michael Sigouros; Alexandros Sigaras; Troy Kane; Pegah Khosravi; Juan Miguel Mosquera; Olivier Elemento; Iman Hajirasouliha
Journal:  EBioMedicine       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Digital pathology and artificial intelligence in translational medicine and clinical practice.

Authors:  Vipul Baxi; Robin Edwards; Michael Montalto; Saurabh Saha
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  ATHENA: Analysis of Tumor Heterogeneity from Spatial Omics Measurements.

Authors:  Adriano Luca Martinelli; Maria Anna Rapsomaniki
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 6.931

6.  CellSpatialGraph: Integrate hierarchical phenotyping and graph modeling to characterize spatial architecture in tumor microenvironment on digital pathology.

Authors:  Pingjun Chen; Muhammad Aminu; Siba El Hussein; Joseph D Khoury; Jia Wu
Journal:  Softw Impacts       Date:  2021-10-09

7.  Pan-tumor CAnine cuTaneous Cancer Histology (CATCH) dataset.

Authors:  Frauke Wilm; Marco Fragoso; Christian Marzahl; Jingna Qiu; Chloé Puget; Laura Diehl; Christof A Bertram; Robert Klopfleisch; Andreas Maier; Katharina Breininger; Marc Aubreville
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 8.501

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.