Literature DB >> 36251045

Minimizing risk of iatrogenic nerve injury during peroneus longus tendon autograft harvest: a cadaveric study at different ankle or knee positions.

Song Wu1, Benjamin Rothrauff2, Jiale Li3, Jinshen He4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the distances using ultrasound between the superficial peroneal nerve (SPN) and sural nerve along the peroneus longus tendon (PLT) autograft harvest path at different ankle or knee positions in order to minimize risk of iatrogenic nerve injury during PLT autograft harvest.
METHODS: Twenty-four fresh-frozen human cadaveric lower extremities were used to harvest a full-thickness PLT autograft with a tendon stripper. Four specimens were utilized to validate correct identification of nerves under ultrasound. Sonographically guided perineural injections were performed at the start point and end point of the PLT harvest path using coloured latex, followed by dissection with gross inspection. Using ultrasound, the distance from the peroneus brevis muscle to the sural nerve at different ankle positions (20° dorsiflexion, neutral, and 20° plantarflexion) was measured, and the distance from the end of the tendon stripper to the SPN at different knee positions (full extension and 90° flexion) was also measured. Measurements were performed by two separate observers using ImageJ software.
RESULTS: Cadaveric dissection showed the presence of latex around nerves in all four specimens. The average distance from the brevis muscle to the sural nerve increased significantly from dorsiflexion to plantarflexion. The shortest distance from the tenodesis site to the sural nerve was 5.8 ± 1.7 mm. There was no significant difference from the end of the tendon stripper to the SPN between full extension or 90° flexion of the knee.
CONCLUSION: When harvesting the PLT, it is recommended to place the ankle at plantarflexion. The knee at full extension or 90° flexion had no effect. Joint positions at the time of graft harvest should be monitored to reduce risks of iatrogenic nerve injury.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ankle; Knee; Peroneal nerve; Peroneus longus tendon; Sural nerve; Tendon stripper; Ultrasound

Year:  2022        PMID: 36251045     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07202-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.114


  4 in total

1.  Identifying the emergence of the superficial peroneal nerve through deep fascia on ultrasound and by dissection: Implications for regional anesthesia in foot and ankle surgery.

Authors:  James Bowness; Katie Turnbull; Alasdair Taylor; Jayne Halcrow; Fraser Chisholm; Calum Grant; Ourania Varsou
Journal:  Clin Anat       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 2.414

2.  Needle arthroscopy in anatomical reconstruction of the lateral ankle: a report of three cases with a parallel comparison to the standard arthroscopy procedure.

Authors:  R Lopes; T Noailles; G Padiolleau; N Bouguennec; T D Vieira
Journal:  J Exp Orthop       Date:  2022-07-30

3.  Analgesic Impact of a Popliteal Plexus Block to Standard Adductor Canal Block in Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Blind Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Atef Mahmoud; Maged Boules; Joseph Botros; Mohamed Mostafa; Safaa Ragab; Mohammed Alsaeid
Journal:  Pain Res Manag       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 3.037

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.