| Literature DB >> 36248926 |
Seifedine Kadry1,2,3, Gautam Srivastava4,5, Venkatesan Rajinikanth6, Seungmin Rho7, Yongsung Kim8.
Abstract
Lung abnormality in humans is steadily increasing due to various causes, and early recognition and treatment are extensively suggested. Tuberculosis (TB) is one of the lung diseases, and due to its occurrence rate and harshness, the World Health Organization (WHO) lists TB among the top ten diseases which lead to death. The clinical level detection of TB is usually performed using bio-medical imaging methods, and a chest X-ray is a commonly adopted imaging modality. This work aims to develop an automated procedure to detect TB from X-ray images using VGG-UNet-supported joint segmentation and classification. The various phases of the proposed scheme involved; (i) image collection and resizing, (ii) deep-features mining, (iii) segmentation of lung section, (iv) local-binary-pattern (LBP) generation and feature extraction, (v) optimal feature selection using spotted hyena algorithm (SHA), (vi) serial feature concatenation, and (vii) classification and validation. This research considered 3000 test images (1500 healthy and 1500 TB class) for the assessment, and the proposed experiment is implemented using Matlab®. This work implements the pretrained models to detect TB in X-rays with improved accuracy, and this research helped achieve a classification accuracy of >99% with a fine-tree classifier.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36248926 PMCID: PMC9560840 DOI: 10.1155/2022/9263379
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Comput Intell Neurosci
Summary of automated TB detection schemes employed to examine X-ray images.
| Reference | Developed procedure |
|---|---|
| Rajaraman and Antani [ | A customized DL system is proposed to examine the Shenzhen CXR pictures, and the proposed system provided an accuracy of 83.7%. However, this work confirms that implementing a customized DL approach is complex and time-consuming |
|
| |
| Hwa et al. [ | Examination of TB from X-ray using ensemble DL system and canny-edge detection is implemented and achieved better values of accuracy (89.77%), sensitivity (90.91%), and specificity (88.64%). However, the implementation of canny-edge detection along with the ensemble DL scheme needs a larger image preprocessing task, and it will increase the detection time |
|
| |
| Wong et al. [ | The development of a customized DL technique called TB-Net is proposed, and this work helped to achieve better performance measures, such as accuracy (99.86%), sensitivity (100%), and specificity (99.71%). This research also proposes a customary model, which is relatively more complex than the pretrained models |
|
| |
| Hooda et al. [ | Seven convolutional layers and three fully connected layer-based customized DL method are proposed for TB detection and achieved a classification accuracy of 94.73% |
|
| |
| Rohilla et al. [ | This work employed the conventional AlexNet and VGG16 methods to examine the X-ray images and attained an accuracy of >81% |
|
| |
| Nguyen et al. [ | X-ray diagnosis performance of pretrained DL schemes is presented, and the employed technique helped to provide better TB recognition |
|
| |
| Afzali et al. [ | The contour-based silhouette descriptor technique is employed to detect TB, and the selected features provided an accuracy of 92.86% |
|
| |
| Stirenko et al. [ | The CNN-based disease diagnosis with lossless and lossy data expansion is employed, and the proposed method offers a better TB diagnosis with X-ray pictures |
|
| |
| Rahman et al. [ | Implementation of combined CNN segmentation and categorization is presented to identify TB from X-ray images. This work implemented the classification task with and without segmentation and achieved a TB detection accuracy of 96.47% and 98.6%, respectively. This work also presented a detailed evaluation methodology for TB detection using various pretrained DL methods |
Figure 1Joint segmentation and classification implemented for TB detection using X-ray.
Chest X-ray image dataset information.
| Class | Dimension | Images | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total | Training | Validation | ||
| Healthy | 224 × 224 × 3 | 1500 | 1050 | 450 |
| TB | 224 × 224 × 3 | 1500 | 1050 | 450 |
Figure 2Sample X-ray images of healthy/TB class.
Figure 3The result achieved with VGG-Unet and the extracted lung section. (a) Test image, (b) binary image, (c) section to be examined.
Figure 4Generated LBP pattern of X-ray for various weights. (a)W = 1, (b)W = 2, (c)W = 3, (d)W = 4.
Figure 5Various stages of SHA. (a) Encircling, (b) hunting, (c) attacking.
Figure 6The SHA-based feature selection process.
Figure 7Sample test images obtained the convolution operation. (a) Normal, (b) TB.
Classification result achieved with DF alone for a 5-fold cross-validation.
| Classifier | TP | FN | TN | FP | ACC (%) | PRE (%) | SEN (%) | SPE (%) | NPV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fold 1 | 418 | 32 | 414 | 36 | 92.44 | 92.07 | 92.89 | 92.00 | 92.82 |
| Fold 2 | 421 | 29 | 419 | 31 | 93.33 | 93.14 | 93.56 | 93.11 | 93.53 |
| Fold 3 | 420 | 30 | 424 | 26 | 93.78 | 94.17 | 93.33 | 94.22 | 93.39 |
| Fold 4 | 423 | 27 | 425 | 25 | 94.22 | 94.42 | 94.00 | 94.44 | 94.03 |
| Fold 5 | 421 | 29 | 423 | 27 | 93.78 | 93.97 | 93.56 | 94.00 | 93.58 |
Figure 8Confusion matrix attained with traditional and optimized features. (a) DF with SoftMax, (b) DF + HF with SoftMax.
Figure 9Investigational outcome of the fine-tree classifier with DF + HF. (a) Convergence, (b) confusion matrix, (c) ROC.
Sample results attained with the implemented UNet scheme.
| Classifier | TP | FN | TN | FP | ACC (%) | PRE (%) | SEN (%) | SPE (%) | NPV (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SoftMax | 441 | 9 | 442 | 8 | 98.11 | 98.22 | 98.00 | 98.22 | 98.00 |
| NB | 442 | 8 | 443 | 7 | 98.33 | 98.44 | 98.22 | 98.44 | 98.23 |
| RF | 441 | 9 | 443 | 7 | 98.22 | 98.44 | 98.00 | 98.44 | 98.01 |
| Coarse tree | 442 | 8 | 442 | 8 | 98.22 | 98.22 | 98.22 | 98.22 | 98.22 |
| Medium tree | 442 | 8 | 444 | 6 | 98.44 | 98.66 | 98.22 | 98.67 | 98.23 |
| Fine tree | 446 | 4 | 447 | 3 | 99.22 | 99.33 | 99.11 | 99.33 | 99.11 |
| Coarse KNN | 445 | 5 | 446 | 4 | 99.00 | 99.11 | 98.89 | 99.11 | 98.89 |
| Medium KNN | 444 | 6 | 445 | 5 | 98.78 | 98.88 | 98.67 | 98.89 | 98.66 |
| Fine KNN | 447 | 3 | 442 | 8 | 98.78 | 98.24 | 99.33 | 98.22 | 99.32 |
| SVM linear | 441 | 9 | 445 | 5 | 98.44 | 98.88 | 98.00 | 98.89 | 98.02 |
Figure 10Overall performance of TB detection system demonstrated with glyph plot. (a) Results with DF + HF, (b) comparison with earlier work.